Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > Selections


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 10-24-2016, 11:43 AM   #1
mistergee
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 770
The Finger for Monday

any strong agreements or disagreements appreciated
Here are the ones under consideration

R1)
like his last race, hasn't been in $ in a while , low % trainer
switches from seemingly more accomplished traner, jocks on fire
afraid of figs coming off good tracks
hates to win, 2 for last 28 last 2 years, low % trainer

R2) englehart trains, last was in slop but seems much faster than these, negative for me is 12 out of 16 2nd and 3rd

R3) embarrassing but I think this is either wide open maybe except for (no chance) , or may have to go with strongest finisher

R4) so many capable of winning in here as well, maybe here is where you spread

R5) Narrowed down to the who went nuts in slop, and the strong finisher, nice connections

R6) all seem capable on their best

R7) listed at 7to5 makes sense, comes over from Presque but shows wins on the real stuff at DEL & PIM, maybe the lone speed to steal at a better price?

R8) won a stake at the Finger 2 back by over 6 lengths, not as much luck in last at Belmont, ran out of her mind in last after first 2 performances were nothing much to look at

R9) form what I see very evenly matched


ok, so what did I miss, or will I hit my rolling pic 3, 4 and 5, good luck
mistergee is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-24-2016, 01:48 PM   #2
ebcorde
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,950
Race 2: Why would the 1 be 1-9 when the 3 is almost equal in ability?

That's why that track is unplayable. I rated it 1-6-3-5. That 1 was not worth 1-9. SMH. Their should be a metric for a track's wps% for 1-9 shots I'll bet FL leads in ripped up tickets
ebcorde is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-24-2016, 01:53 PM   #3
ebcorde
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,950
I think the best bet there today

is the 2 in Race 8

followed by the 1 in Race 4
only reason for playing Today is the P5 carryover.
ebcorde is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-24-2016, 02:06 PM   #4
ebcorde
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistergee
any strong agreements or disagreements appreciated
Here are the ones under consideration

R1)
like his last race, hasn't been in $ in a while , low % trainer
switches from seemingly more accomplished traner, jocks on fire
afraid of figs coming off good tracks
hates to win, 2 for last 28 last 2 years, low % trainer

R2) englehart trains, last was in slop but seems much faster than these, negative for me is 12 out of 16 2nd and 3rd

R3) embarrassing but I think this is either wide open maybe except for (no chance) , or may have to go with strongest finisher

R4) so many capable of winning in here as well, maybe here is where you spread

R5) Narrowed down to the who went nuts in slop, and the strong finisher, nice connections

R6) all seem capable on their best

R7) listed at 7to5 makes sense, comes over from Presque but shows wins on the real stuff at DEL & PIM, maybe the lone speed to steal at a better price?

R8) won a stake at the Finger 2 back by over 6 lengths, not as much luck in last at Belmont, ran out of her mind in last after first 2 performances were nothing much to look at

R9) form what I see very evenly matched


ok, so what did I miss, or will I hit my rolling pic 3, 4 and 5, good luck

oh yeah your picks are logical. I used the 2,3 and 5 in Race 1.

best I can add are to your mix that you don't have

r3 yes tracks too unpredictable
r4 I;m going to narrow it down `1,3,4 LS:7
r5 10-1-3-1a-11
r6 6-4-9-1a
r7 same
r8 2
r9 4-7-2-8

I won't be betting all these Horses, very possible to hit it and lose money lol
ebcorde is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-24-2016, 02:25 PM   #5
mistergee
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 770
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebcorde
That's why that track is unplayable. I rated it 1-6-3-5. That 1 was not worth 1-9. SMH. Their should be a metric for a track's wps% for 1-9 shots I'll bet FL leads in ripped up tickets
it does seem that way
mistergee is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-24-2016, 02:58 PM   #6
mistergee
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 770
in race 5 the is now 6 to 5. If it wins they are changing the name of the track to Englehart Lakes
mistergee is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-24-2016, 03:03 PM   #7
lamboguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistergee
in race 5 the is now 6 to 5. If it wins they are changing the name of the track to Englehart Lakes
i hate that horse today
lamboguy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-24-2016, 03:08 PM   #8
lamboguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,757
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
i hate that horse today
just put that one in the winners circle
lamboguy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-24-2016, 03:08 PM   #9
mistergee
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 770
drifted up to 7 to 1 and wins. Englehart Lakes it is!!
mistergee is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-24-2016, 03:11 PM   #10
ebcorde
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,950
I gambled on the 50 Pk5

took the 7. had the 11,1,9 in the P3. so why not.

so I topped the P5 with the 7,10

oh well the 7 looked promising.

oh I see it paid 600 for $2 in the triple. never thought of it.
ebcorde is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-24-2016, 03:15 PM   #11
mistergee
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 770
Quote:
Originally Posted by ebcorde
took the 7. had the 11,1,9 in the P3. so why not.

so I topped the P5 with the 7,10

oh well the 7 looked promising.

oh I see it paid 600 for $2 in the triple. never thought of it.
great longshot pick on , I never would of had that one
mistergee is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-24-2016, 03:26 PM   #12
ebcorde
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,950
Quote:
Originally Posted by mistergee
great longshot pick on , I never would of had that one

well I it computer rated 10-1-3-1a-11-7-9 that ls why
ebcorde is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-24-2016, 03:29 PM   #13
ebcorde
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,950
late P4

1,2,4,6
1,2,4
2,
4,7
ebcorde is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-24-2016, 03:54 PM   #14
mistergee
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 770
late pic 3

1-2-4/2-7/1-2-4-5-7
mistergee is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-24-2016, 04:41 PM   #15
ebcorde
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,950
Typical Finger Lakes

1-9, 1-5 1-4.. SURE SIGN HE'LL LOSE THERE. i'm telling you they need to have a stat for tracks win% when below 3-5. this track would have the lowest win%


see ya Finger Lakes maybe one time again Next year
ebcorde is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.