Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz
Actually, I don't or I wouldn't have asked the question.
Still don't. Why don't you educate me?
And then there is this...
So, clearly you've used my software, huh?
|
dave
what he was attempting to ask was
is there anywhere in the world where there are advanced projected odds that
get somewhat
close to the right approximations of what the toteboard will be
displaying for all the entrants at the off times .
is there anything out there that anyone has created or even comes close ??
and my response was no there isn't !!! but there are a select few
including myself who have that answer
nobody has a clue .
none of the professionals around my circle have a clue
do you know how many contests players i get saying
so whats the price on this guy going to be in the 8th .??
so i give them my best approximations
u see all they know is the handicapping part but both is very very difficult
for many to master . and this is what i learnt
and the second part of your question
do you really think that i would be challenging old archaic ways of doing things if i didn't use your software and put it through the ringer.
i let u decide on that one
by the way i respect everything you have done and are still doing for the horseplayer . One day i hope to sit down with u one on one and discuss all the fascinating elements that can be extracted from your programs as
there are kids i work with that are just (well i have no words )
they just smoke me in analytics , theory and visuals
unfortunately they are missing experience which makes them dependent
but in my opinion the word software is a dangerous word
as it creates a sort of illusion for the regular horseplayer that there is an easier way to win.
when in reality we both know that all it does is make the invisible / visible
and makes the accumulation of knowledge easy to access while reducing the time concept
knowledge is very weak without the hands on experience
and the rest is the subconscious of the horsepalyer to really make things happen