|
01-24-2019, 12:00 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,943
|
ESPN's Tom Jackson...Patriots "Greatest Franchise in NFL history"
I disagree, respectfully.
Greatest franchise over the entirety of the NFL's existence is the Chicago Bears.
Greatest team of the Super Bowl era is the Pittsburgh Steelers.
Of course, simply my opinion. I base my opinion on the fact that since 1974 the Pittsburgh Steelers have had a 45 year unbroken streak of relevancy. There have been very, very few seasons since the season defined by "The Catch" that the Steelers have not been a major legitimate subject in the playoff, if not championship, discussion. This period has spanned 3 coaches and numerous QBs and assorted stars and superstars. The Patriots, though having won a couple AFC Championships previously, rest their claim almost entirely on the Belichick/Brady era. If the Patriots could carry on for another 15 years after those two retire, then they would have a much more legitimate claim.
IMHO. Everybody is entitled to it.
|
|
|
01-24-2019, 12:29 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,749
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultracapper
I disagree, respectfully.
Greatest franchise over the entirety of the NFL's existence is the Chicago Bears.
Greatest team of the Super Bowl era is the Pittsburgh Steelers.
Of course, simply my opinion. I base my opinion on the fact that since 1974 the Pittsburgh Steelers have had a 45 year unbroken streak of relevancy. There have been very, very few seasons since the season defined by "The Catch" that the Steelers have not been a major legitimate subject in the playoff, if not championship, discussion. This period has spanned 3 coaches and numerous QBs and assorted stars and superstars. The Patriots, though having won a couple AFC Championships previously, rest their claim almost entirely on the Belichick/Brady era. If the Patriots could carry on for another 15 years after those two retire, then they would have a much more legitimate claim.
IMHO. Everybody is entitled to it.
|
Although I grew up a Colts fan, the Steelers-Vikings was the 1st SB that I watched. That made me an automatic Steelers fan back then,but I'm still giving it to the Patriots because of the salary cap restrictions. I look at their personnel year after year and wonder how they always win.
|
|
|
01-24-2019, 06:17 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,438
|
"Greatest Franchise in NFL History" My vote... Green Bay Packers. 13 time NFL Champions. Only team to win 3 in a row. (Twice). Won 5 championships in 7 years. Lombardi era. Bears have 9...Steelers 6 ..Patriots 5. Packers also lost 3 Championship games. Full disclosure- I am a Packer shareholder. Part owner!!!
|
|
|
01-24-2019, 09:09 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind the Pine Curtain
Posts: 10,643
|
The Pats for the past 18 years is a standard of excellence that no one has seen before or will in anyone living's lifetime.
The 1960s Packers dynasty was my earliest memories, but as soon as the core of players were retiring or past their prime, Lombardi hit the road to DC. They weren't relevant for another twenty plus years.
The steelers after the Bradshaw era were also rans for a full decade.
The Niners were great in the 80s and 90s. They're the closest thing to the Pats I've seen.
An old time Cowboys fan, they get no vote here. Under Landry in the 60s they were second fiddle to Green Bay, 70s second fiddle to the steelers, 80s second fiddle to SF,... Then in the Johnson-jones era (89-93) early to mid 90s, they were relevant for only half the decade. Barry Switzer (95 super bowl) left the cow dogs in the same sad shape he left ou in. Complete chaos with the inmates ruling the asylum. Jerreh hasn't been able to get them on track ever since.
Last edited by ElKabong; 01-24-2019 at 09:14 PM.
|
|
|
01-25-2019, 01:39 AM
|
#6
|
Beat up 💪
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Beach life in Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 11,938
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultracapper
I disagree, respectfully.
IMHO. Everybody is entitled to it.
|
The Patriots were nowhere and the fact that anyone can say greatest franchise and be taken seriously is 100% Brady. +Coach.
When Brady's stats are compared its still hard to believe.
Tom Brady has played in more Super Bowls than any non-Patriots franchise in the NFL
Tom Brady has played in more postseason games than 18 NFL teams
Tom Brady has won more playoff games than 27 franchises
Tom Brady has more Super Bowl passing yards than 32 first-round quarterbacks had in their entire NFL careers
|
|
|
01-25-2019, 02:41 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 32
|
What good are all those stats if you lose Superbowls? I’ll give it to Brady for being very durable, not having any serious injury and playing at a high level for such a long time which allowed him to accumulate all those stats you mentioned. But just beating up on the AFC and losing 3 of the last 5 superbowls don’t cut it. He could have been 0-5 if Pete Carroll didn’t suffer a brain fade at the end of the Seattle/New England game and neglected to run Marshawn Lynch from the 1 yard line or jittery Matt Ryan reverting back to his past playoff form in the 4th quarter going ‘3 and out’ multiple times giving that game away. Sorry, but you Brady fans touting him as GOAT is getting old. Getting to the Superbowl is fine but how about winning some? Or at least have an 80% win/loss record please…
Superbowls
W/L record……..Brady…..5-3 Montana.……4-0
completion% ….Brady…65.8% Montana…68.0%
touchdown%....Brady...5.04% Montana…9.01%
interception%...Brady...1.40% Montana…0.00%
passer rating..…Brady….98.0 Montana…127.8%
Looks to me like there was a better QB roaming the superbowl fields in the 80s….
|
|
|
01-25-2019, 07:25 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston , Tx.
Posts: 9,586
|
Its not even close. The Patriots take it hands down. Numbers are everything in a debate like this.
Suggesting Brady and 1 or 2 others made the difference isn't correct either. They had offensive lines throughout that were second to none.
Brady haters, like Tiger haters, will always argue their success and give them due credit. The Packers who I loved as a kid had great teams, but were in no way in the same class. I don't like comparing the old with the new because it was a different game back then, but in this case its obvious.
|
|
|
01-25-2019, 07:34 AM
|
#9
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 248
|
what about the jets with jo willie,a 2 year dynasty.
|
|
|
01-25-2019, 11:02 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,548
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Man o' War
What good are all those stats if you lose Superbowls? I’ll give it to Brady for being very durable, not having any serious injury and playing at a high level for such a long time which allowed him to accumulate all those stats you mentioned. But just beating up on the AFC and losing 3 of the last 5 superbowls don’t cut it. He could have been 0-5 if Pete Carroll didn’t suffer a brain fade at the end of the Seattle/New England game and neglected to run Marshawn Lynch from the 1 yard line or jittery Matt Ryan reverting back to his past playoff form in the 4th quarter going ‘3 and out’ multiple times giving that game away. Sorry, but you Brady fans touting him as GOAT is getting old. Getting to the Superbowl is fine but how about winning some? Or at least have an 80% win/loss record please…
Superbowls
W/L record……..Brady…..5-3 Montana.……4-0
completion% ….Brady…65.8% Montana…68.0%
touchdown%....Brady...5.04% Montana…9.01%
interception%...Brady...1.40% Montana…0.00%
passer rating..…Brady….98.0 Montana…127.8%
Looks to me like there was a better QB roaming the superbowl fields in the 80s….
|
And yet...when Joe Montana is asked whom he considers to be the best ever quarterback...he says: Tom Brady. Or is he just being modest?
__________________
Live to play another day.
|
|
|
01-26-2019, 12:09 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 32
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
And yet...when Joe Montana is asked whom he considers to be the best ever quarterback...he says: Tom Brady. Or is he just being modest?
|
Yeah…he’s an aw-shucks kinda guy!
|
|
|
01-26-2019, 12:18 AM
|
#12
|
Beat up 💪
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Beach life in Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 11,938
|
Montana on a podcast last month. *pre-brady 9
Quote:
Eh, everybody wants that title I think. I think it’s really hard to give anyone that title. Tom obviously has had a tremendous career and I have a lot of respect for what he’s done and all he’s accomplished. You know, everybody tried to compare us and there’s just no comparison. The way I look at it, I mean if you go back and try to compare when I played to guys who played long before me if you look at Otto Graham and Sammy Baugh, those guys were way ahead of their time in what they were able to accomplish. You can hardly find film on them, but you know, the game is forever changing and I just say enjoy everyone for what it’s worth. Yeah, I’m just happy to be in the conversation, but obviously, Tom is just putting up stupid numbers so it’s going to be hard for anybody to catch him I think.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|