 |
06-11-2011, 06:43 PM
|
#1
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
1.1 Million Pk6 Carryover into next Weds at Belmont.
Start cappin boys!
|
|
|
|
06-11-2011, 06:51 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
|
gah!
|
|
|
|
|
06-11-2011, 06:52 PM
|
#3
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9,893
|
what did 5 of 6 pay?
|
|
|
|
|
06-11-2011, 06:54 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 1,028
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Saratoga_Mike
what did 5 of 6 pay?
|
20,530
|
|
|
|
|
06-11-2011, 06:54 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 7
|
5 of 6 - 20,530.00
|
|
|
|
|
06-11-2011, 06:55 PM
|
#6
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9,893
|
wow, thx
|
|
|
|
|
06-11-2011, 07:01 PM
|
#7
|
|
Traded By Cubs
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 2 miles north of Wrigley Field
Posts: 5,339
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by justdmbobbo
5 of 6 - 20,530.00
|
Hmm. Is that an Overlay, or an Underlay? Picking 5 of 6 on a card with 2 $20-ish winners, a $40-ish winner, a $50-ish winner, and a $10 winner that was the 4th betting choice, I thinking it's an underlay. But for those who have it, it's a heck of a lot of cash. Playing all of those on one ticket, they were expecting a lot of cash - and probably more.
Did anyone notice that if #9 Animal Kingdom & $12 Shackelford, the bet would have carried over? Guess only people left were nearly all players who were trying to beat the favorite or the name horse in the Belmont, and quick-pickers/guessers. THey were right, those two didn't win the Belmont at least.
|
|
|
|
|
06-11-2011, 07:04 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,019
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
Start cappin boys!
|
You better have already downloaded Wed. Belmont card. 
|
|
|
|
|
06-11-2011, 07:17 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Off the Turnpike
Posts: 2,930
|
It was easy......all you had to do was eliminate all horses from the 5 post on out.
|
|
|
|
|
06-11-2011, 07:23 PM
|
#10
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by speed
You better have already downloaded Wed. Belmont card. |
I didnt download and print yet, but i'm working now....u know i need a lot of time! 
|
|
|
|
|
06-11-2011, 09:05 PM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,569
|
Hey guys,
I have been toying with an idea lately, which occurred to me when I saw a thread awhile ago about members here forming a horse owning syndicate.
What if we formed a betting syndicate...for the purpose of properly attacking these pick-6 carryovers?
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
Last edited by thaskalos; 06-11-2011 at 09:06 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
06-11-2011, 10:10 PM
|
#13
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 423
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thaskalos
Hey guys,
I have been toying with an idea lately, which occurred to me when I saw a thread awhile ago about members here forming a horse owning syndicate.
What if we formed a betting syndicate...for the purpose of properly attacking these pick-6 carryovers?
|
I'm in if you would let me.
|
|
|
|
|
06-12-2011, 12:11 AM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 605
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thaskalos
Hey guys,
I have been toying with an idea lately, which occurred to me when I saw a thread awhile ago about members here forming a horse owning syndicate.
What if we formed a betting syndicate...for the purpose of properly attacking these pick-6 carryovers?
|
This is a wonderful idea. What could POSSIBLY go wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
06-12-2011, 01:44 AM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 62
|
if you can get by the problem of who will handle the money, then having 20 0r so opinions should present no problems in making out the play
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
