|
|
12-02-2021, 04:52 PM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,104
|
Justice Kavanaugh listed four examples of cases where the Supreme Court over turned previous rulings. Brown v Board of Education, Miranda v Arizona, Lawrence v Texas and Obergefell v Hodges. What Justice Kavenaugh ignored is that those were all cases in which individual liberty and freedom were enhanced, whereas overturning Roe v Wade would greatly diminish the rights of women in this country.
It is amazing to me that the political party which constantly screams about individual liberty and personal freedom is the party which is trying to take away a woman’s right to choose; is the party which is trying to take away the right to vote. ; is the party suggesting only Christians should serve in Congress; is, in fact, not for individual liberty at all, unless that reflects their very narrow definition.
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
|
|
|
12-02-2021, 05:42 PM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 10,999
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost
Justice Kavanaugh listed four examples of cases where the Supreme Court over turned previous rulings. Brown v Board of Education, Miranda v Arizona, Lawrence v Texas and Obergefell v Hodges. What Justice Kavenaugh ignored is that those were all cases in which individual liberty and freedom were enhanced, whereas overturning Roe v Wade would greatly diminish the rights of women in this country.
It is amazing to me that the political party which constantly screams about individual liberty and personal freedom is the party which is trying to take away a woman’s right to choose; is the party which is trying to take away the right to vote. ; is the party suggesting only Christians should serve in Congress; is, in fact, not for individual liberty at all, unless that reflects their very narrow definition.
|
All your examples are a result of the political process. If the voters had wanted a different result they should have voted differently.
__________________
All I needed in life I learned from Gary Larson.
|
|
|
12-02-2021, 06:05 PM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,651
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJDave
Why is it that WOMEN, who make up a majority of the electorate, have failed in protecting their reproductive rights?
|
you mean their constitutional rights? or their rights to murder their children?
|
|
|
12-02-2021, 06:24 PM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,285
|
[QUOTE=mostpost;2769928]Justice Kavanaugh listed four examples of cases where the Supreme Court over turned previous rulings. Brown v Board of Education, Miranda v Arizona, Lawrence v Texas and Obergefell v Hodges. What Justice Kavenaugh ignored is that those were all cases in which individual liberty and freedom were enhanced, whereas overturning Roe v Wade would greatly diminish the rights of women in this country......./QUOTE]
Would overturning Roe v Wade enhance the rights of a child in a woman's womb?
__________________
Best writing advice ever received: Never use a long word when a diminutive one will suffice.
|
|
|
12-02-2021, 06:26 PM
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 10,999
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
you mean their constitutional rights? or their rights to murder their children?
|
A fetus is not a child but whatever you think, dude. I don’t particularly care.
I like the option of abortion for those who won’t take responsibility for their actions. It saves me money. If it goes away, so be it. But like I said before, I won’t be around.
__________________
All I needed in life I learned from Gary Larson.
|
|
|
12-02-2021, 06:32 PM
|
#21
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost
Justice Kavanaugh listed four examples of cases where the Supreme Court over turned previous rulings. Brown v Board of Education, Miranda v Arizona, Lawrence v Texas and Obergefell v Hodges. What Justice Kavenaugh ignored is that those were all cases in which individual liberty and freedom were enhanced, whereas overturning Roe v Wade would greatly diminish the rights of women in this country.
It is amazing to me that the political party which constantly screams about individual liberty and personal freedom is the party which is trying to take away a woman’s right to choose; is the party which is trying to take away the right to vote. ; is the party suggesting only Christians should serve in Congress; is, in fact, not for individual liberty at all, unless that reflects their very narrow definition.
|
No one has the right to murder another human being. See Ex 21:22-25.
Also, list the rightS of women that would be "greatly diminished" if Roe were to be overturned with respect to abortions-on-demand.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
Last edited by boxcar; 12-02-2021 at 06:33 PM.
|
|
|
12-02-2021, 06:41 PM
|
#22
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJDave
A fetus is not a child but whatever you think, dude. I don’t particularly care.
I like the option of abortion for those who won’t take responsibility for their actions. It saves me money. If it goes away, so be it. But like I said before, I won’t be around.
|
So it is not about you or your money, this case is states rights.
|
|
|
12-02-2021, 06:52 PM
|
#23
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 10,999
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fast4522
So it is not about you or your money, this case is states rights.
|
Everything is about me and my money.
__________________
All I needed in life I learned from Gary Larson.
|
|
|
12-02-2021, 07:00 PM
|
#24
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJDave
Everything is about me and my money.
|
The states rights supersede any and all piss ass feelings about individuals and their moneys.
|
|
|
12-02-2021, 07:51 PM
|
#25
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fast4522
So it is not about you or your money, this case is states rights.
|
Oh, no..you don't understand liberals. It's all about TJ's money -- you know all that money that he's not going to take with him when his number is punched. Most liberals live in a very tiny universe. And in each case the name of the universe is the same: SELF.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
12-02-2021, 10:09 PM
|
#26
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,651
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TJDave
Everything is about me and my money.
|
you must love the JoeHo plan on taking most of it and redistributing to be more equitable
|
|
|
12-02-2021, 10:45 PM
|
#27
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,483
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
Oh, no..you don't understand liberals. It's all about TJ's money -- you know all that money that he's not going to take with him when his number is punched. Most liberals live in a very tiny universe. And in each case the name of the universe is the same: SELF.
|
It is his religion isn't it, what is good for his house let no man go into. I am more interested in the underpinnings of our system and what it provides for or not. When his number is punched remains a very private thing, although he provides a clear picture of how much runway he has left in his breadcrumbs. The universe that liberals live in has nothing to do with us other than current policy, but live and let live right? How much time are we going to spend on things that we can not change.?
|
|
|
12-02-2021, 11:28 PM
|
#28
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,871
|
Quote:
The universe that liberals live in has nothing to do with us other than current policy, but live and let live right?
|
Actually, the libs say live and let die.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
12-03-2021, 01:17 AM
|
#29
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,104
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
No one has the right to murder another human being. See Ex 21:22-25.
Also, list the rightS of women that would be "greatly diminished" if Roe were to be overturned with respect to abortions-on-demand.
|
The right to control their own body. The right to make decisions about their health and well-being without interference from the state. The right to decide when and if they want to start a family. The right to decide how many children they want to have in that family.
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
|
|
|
12-03-2021, 01:35 AM
|
#30
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost
The right to control their own body. The right to make decisions about their health and well-being without interference from the state.
|
So, no forced jabs either....right?
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|