|
|
01-02-2018, 03:53 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 47
|
Fans advocacy group to support safety?
I was live-streaming today’s first race at Parx, and the caller mentioned a horse (Lust for Money) and jockey went down. It happened off camera, and about 10 minutes later Parx suspended racing for the day because of the cold. I then saw tweets indicating Lust for Money had died (presumably euthanized), but there were no details. Some tweets expressed anger that a horse had to die before racing was cancelled.
As someone who’s fairly new to the sport, it angers me if the horses’ safety takes a backseat to business interests. Not saying this was the case here since I don’t know the particulars about what happened today, but it did make me wonder if there’s an advocacy group of fans that works to help ensure the safety of the horses comes first? I’ve read a little about the NTRA, but it looks like it’s more of a trade group and this is just one of many things it promotes.
Is there a fan-centered group that advocates solely for safer racing?
Last edited by Gasser57; 01-02-2018 at 03:55 PM.
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 03:59 PM
|
#2
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gasser57
I was live-streaming today’s first race at Parx, and the caller mentioned a horse (Lust for Money) and jockey went down. It happened off camera, and about 10 minutes later Parx suspended racing for the day because of the cold. I then saw tweets indicating Lust for Money had died (presumably euthanized), but there were no details. Some tweets expressed anger that a horse had to die before racing was cancelled.
As someone who’s fairly new to the sport, it angers me if the horses’ safety takes a backseat to business interests. Not saying this was the case here since I don’t know the particulars about what happened today, but it did make me wonder if there’s an advocacy group of fans that works to help ensure the safety of the horses comes first? I’ve read a little about the NTRA, but it looks like it’s more of a trade group and this is just one of many things it promotes.
Is there a fan-centered group that advocates solely for safer racing?
|
No, there's not.
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 04:13 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,557
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gasser57
I was live-streaming today’s first race at Parx, and the caller mentioned a horse (Lust for Money) and jockey went down. It happened off camera, and about 10 minutes later Parx suspended racing for the day because of the cold. I the saw tweets indicating Lust for Money died (presumably euthanized), but there were no details. Some tweets expressed anger that a horse had to die before racing was cancelled.
As someone who’s fairly new to the sport, it angers me if the horses’ safety takes a backseat to business interests. Not saying this was the case here since I don’t know the particulars about what happened today, but it did make me wonder if there’s an advocacy group of fans that works to help ensure the safety of the horses comes first? I’ve read a little about the NTRA, but it looks like it’s more of a trade group and this is just one of many things it promotes.
Is there a fan-centered group that advocates solely for safer racing?
|
If this is true...then you will have a difficult time adjusting to this game. Here...powerful painkillers are administered to these horses in order "keep them racing", when they should really be resting while mending their various injuries. And this happens throughout the year. Consequently...not only are the sport's "business interests" held in higher regard than the "safety of the horses"...they are considered more important than the safety of their riders, as well.
And we horseplayers are most interested in our "business interests" too...while we try to keep these "ugly details" out of our minds as we try to "pick winners". Sadly...you can't be "sensitive" in this business. You either get "disensitized"...or you get OUT.
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 04:38 PM
|
#4
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,870
|
Quote:
As someone who’s fairly new to the sport, it angers me if the horses’ safety takes a backseat to business interests.
|
Seriously, I have two words for you:
RUN!
NOW!
Many do not give a crap about horse safety and even more do not give a crap about you as a customer.
You will quickly learn that most, if not all tracks, either do not care or do not possess the mental abilities to effect any meaningful changes
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 05:00 PM
|
#5
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gasser57
As someone who’s fairly new to the sport, it angers me if the horses’ safety takes a backseat to business interests.
|
I feel comfortable saying a horse's safety does NOT take a backseat to business interests. Now, obviously, this isn't always the case. But where else in the world is it the case?
Even PETA has been shown to kill a whole shitload of animals it had in its care at some of its shelters.
And yes, there are some trainers who are out there for the buck and will do anything to get it, including putting animals at risk.
But, for the most part, I would say that the horses in this game are cared for as best as possible, under the current guidelines in place.
Yes, you can complain about LEGAL medications such as bute (painkillers) and lasix (anti-bleeders). But they are legal for use and those using them are operating under the laws that are in place.
But just like any other industry, there are those individuals who seek to push the envelope and beyond. This isn't a perfect world.
But to postulate that horse's safety (and by extension, jockey safety) takes a backseat to business interests is unfair in my opinion.
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 05:13 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 265
|
Perfectly stated PA. I know a few horsemen and I can tell you that they care for their horses like they do family members. There will always be bad apples that put $ before all else but that exists in every walk of life.
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 05:58 PM
|
#7
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,870
|
http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/s...d.php?t=142208
But the game still allows this crap to occur.
The game needs to be purged of the slimeballs who pretend to be trainers.
And it ain't happening fast enough.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 06:14 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,338
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
But just like any other industry, there are those individuals who seek to push the envelope and beyond. This isn't a perfect world.
|
Is it safe to assume that those individuals gravitate to the tracks at which it is easier to push the envelope? I mention this because I'd handicapped Parx's Monday card for a tournament. Two horses on the card were coming back after two days' rest. One was a granddaughter of Holy Bull, and was making her fourth lifetime start, all at Parx. Prior to her race on Friday (in which she ran hard but wide) she'd been laid off for two months. Surely her trainer knows horses better than I, but I was vaguely relieved when the card was cancelled, despite having spent a couple of hours handicapping it.
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 06:50 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 47
|
So it sounds like opinions are mixed regarding whether the horses' well-being (and by extension, the jockeys') are subordinate to business interests.
Tom - thanks for posting the Penn thread. After reading that it sounds like the best thing to do about tracks that show a flagrant disregard for safety is boycott them. I certainly won't give Penn any more business, and will do some research to try and figure out which tracks care more about the horses and jockeys and just play them. Mulerider's post about Parx carding two horses in a race that only had two days off suggests along with today's event mentioned in my OP that I don't need to give them any business either.
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 08:04 PM
|
#10
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
I feel comfortable saying a horse's safety does NOT take a backseat to business interests. Now, obviously, this isn't always the case. But where else in the world is it the case?
Even PETA has been shown to kill a whole shitload of animals it had in its care at some of its shelters.
And yes, there are some trainers who are out there for the buck and will do anything to get it, including putting animals at risk.
But, for the most part, I would say that the horses in this game are cared for as best as possible, under the current guidelines in place.
Yes, you can complain about LEGAL medications such as bute (painkillers) and lasix (anti-bleeders). But they are legal for use and those using them are operating under the laws that are in place.
But just like any other industry, there are those individuals who seek to push the envelope and beyond. This isn't a perfect world.
But to postulate that horse's safety (and by extension, jockey safety) takes a backseat to business interests is unfair in my opinion.
|
Thank you.
There are many in the business who take great care of the horses.
There's a sickening story with photos making its round on FB about the ass**** who left a dog chained to the front porch in this weather and it was found frozen to death. Do we condemn all dog owners?
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 08:19 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,557
|
There was trainer testimony in Pennsylvania that as many as 95% of the trainers at Penn National "cheat" by illegally administering medication to their horses on race day. Isn't this "placing business-interests ahead of the interests of the horse"? Is Penn National that much different than Parx...or Charlestown...or Evangeline...or Delta Downs, etc...in this regard?
Or do we deny the cheating allegations...even when the trainers themselves admit to them?
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 08:31 PM
|
#12
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,870
|
Quote:
Or do we deny the cheating allegations...even when the trainers themselves admit to them?
|
A conundrum.
You know trainers never tell the truth!
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 08:32 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,557
|
There was also a report circulating a few years ago...on a massive study that was conducted on the fractured limbs of horses who had suffered fatal breakdowns while racing or working out. It reported that, in about 75% of the cases, the fatal break of the limb occurred precisely on the same spot where there was evidence of prior trauma...suggesting that the horse was brought back to racing before its prior serious injury had properly healed. Isn't this also an indication of placing "business" ahead of "safety"?
Of course, these reports seldom enjoy wide publicity...because they interfere with the "business interests" of the sport. How many horses die at the track every year...and how little mention do these unfortunate horses garner?
Just because we play this game doesn't mean that we must also keep our heads buried in the sand.
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
Last edited by thaskalos; 01-02-2018 at 08:35 PM.
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 01:02 PM
|
#14
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
There was also a report circulating a few years ago...on a massive study that was conducted on the fractured limbs of horses who had suffered fatal breakdowns while racing or working out. It reported that, in about 75% of the cases, the fatal break of the limb occurred precisely on the same spot where there was evidence of prior trauma...suggesting that the horse was brought back to racing before its prior serious injury had properly healed. Isn't this also an indication of placing "business" ahead of "safety"?
Of course, these reports seldom enjoy wide publicity...because they interfere with the "business interests" of the sport. How many horses die at the track every year...and how little mention do these unfortunate horses garner?
Just because we play this game doesn't mean that we must also keep our heads buried in the sand.
|
Those reports see wide circulation. Everyone in racing has read them and knows this to be the case. It isn't indication of being brought back to racing prior to proper healing of a previous serious injury. Instead, it's the beginning stages of the future fracture.
The problem is detection. If the horse is showing no signs of lameness, then it can get past the trainer, the trainer's vet, and the state vet. This isn't to say that there aren't trainers who will overlook or cover up signs of lameness, but most are conscientious.
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 01:04 PM
|
#15
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
There was trainer testimony in Pennsylvania that as many as 95% of the trainers at Penn National "cheat" by illegally administering medication to their horses on race day. Isn't this "placing business-interests ahead of the interests of the horse"? Is Penn National that much different than Parx...or Charlestown...or Evangeline...or Delta Downs, etc...in this regard?
Or do we deny the cheating allegations...even when the trainers themselves admit to them?
|
Cheaters saying everyone else is doing it isn't entirely believable, is it?
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|