|
|
12-15-2017, 11:12 AM
|
#631
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 11,474
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FantasticDan
|
People make mistakes Dan.
Just like your original link.
|
|
|
12-15-2017, 11:20 AM
|
#632
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,822
|
We don’t care. As long as it’s not a left wing judge.
WE DONT CARE ANYMORE!
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
|
|
|
12-15-2017, 01:24 PM
|
#633
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mukwonago, WI
Posts: 3,209
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FantasticDan
|
And he was ruled to lack the qualifications, what of it? He's not going to serve, so where is the problem? Oh, I get it, Trump nominated him. Check.
Is this all you've got?
__________________
"I don't always frequent message boards, but when I do, I prefer PaceAdvantage."
|
|
|
12-15-2017, 01:26 PM
|
#634
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mukwonago, WI
Posts: 3,209
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRalph
We don’t care. As long as it’s not a left wing judge.
WE DONT CARE ANYMORE!
|
The main reason I voted for Trump. People can thank me later...
__________________
"I don't always frequent message boards, but when I do, I prefer PaceAdvantage."
|
|
|
12-15-2017, 01:37 PM
|
#635
|
gelding
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wisconsin
And he was ruled to lack the qualifications, what of it? He's not going to serve, so where is the problem? Oh, I get it, Trump nominated him. Check. Is this all you've got?
|
All I've got? Have you read the board in the last year?
The PROBLEM is that Trump nominated a wholly unqualified person to head an important federal court. Was the person even vetted before being nominated? Or did they not even give a crap because other unqualified Trump judges had already been pushed through?
https://www.npr.org/2017/11/09/56313...as-federal-jud
|
|
|
12-15-2017, 03:29 PM
|
#636
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,889
|
Compare him to the 9th Circus court and he is outstanding!
The only requirement for a good judge is he NOT be a democrat!
Ths why we voted for Trump!
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
12-16-2017, 11:29 AM
|
#637
|
gelding
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,883
|
|
|
|
12-16-2017, 11:49 AM
|
#638
|
gelding
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,883
|
Obama always acknowledged Sandy Hook at this time of year, and even invited Sandy Hook families to the White House Christmas party.
Trump has ignored the 5th anniversary of the Sandy Hook massacre, and instead invited the NRA CEO to the White House Christmas party.
|
|
|
12-16-2017, 11:59 AM
|
#639
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FantasticDan
Obama always acknowledged Sandy Hook at this time of year, and even invited Sandy Hook families to the White House Christmas party.
Trump has ignored the 5th anniversary of the Sandy Hook massacre, and instead invited the NRA CEO to the White House Christmas party.
|
You may want to check, but I am pretty sure that is an impeachable offense.
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
12-16-2017, 12:07 PM
|
#640
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,149
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FantasticDan
|
Please, the Gramscian left wingers have taken a total dump in regard to language. Undocumented instead of Illegal, Diversity instead of Affirmative Action, etc etc.
|
|
|
12-16-2017, 12:09 PM
|
#641
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,149
|
|
|
|
12-16-2017, 12:12 PM
|
#642
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FantasticDan
Obama always acknowledged Sandy Hook at this time of year, and even invited Sandy Hook families to the White House Christmas party.
Trump has ignored the 5th anniversary of the Sandy Hook massacre, and instead invited the NRA CEO to the White House Christmas party.
|
From the very beginning, Obama shamelessly used the victims of Sandy Hook as props in his war against the 2nd Amendment.
It may come as a shock to some, but when a president takes office, he does not inherit the agendas and biases of the previous occupant of the Oval Office.
There's a new sheriff in town.
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
12-16-2017, 12:22 PM
|
#643
|
gelding
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker
From the very beginning, Obama shamelessly used the victims of Sandy Hook as props in his war against the 2nd Amendment.
It may come as a shock to some, but when a president takes office, he does not inherit the agendas and biases of the previous occupant of the Oval Office.
There's a new sheriff in town.
|
I know you have an irresistible Pavlovian response to attack any post that dares suggest any criticism of the NRA or guns, but c'mon now..
Yeesh.
Last edited by FantasticDan; 12-16-2017 at 12:23 PM.
|
|
|
12-16-2017, 12:35 PM
|
#644
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FantasticDan
I know you have an irresistible Pavlovian response to attack any post that dares suggest any criticism of the NRA or guns, but c'mon now..
Yeesh.
|
I stated my opinion that Obama's annual custom regarding Sandy Hook was motivated by his bias against the 2nd Amendment. Unable to deny his bias, you blame my accusation on my "bias" in favor of the 2nd Amendment.
I have my own criticisms of the NRA and of Wayne LaPierre. But I do tend to have an automatic response to irrational and uninformed opposition to the 2nd Amendment, of which Obama was guilty.
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
12-16-2017, 01:43 PM
|
#645
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,662
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker
You may want to check, but I am pretty sure that is an impeachable offense.
|
If the dimocrats get control of the House, there already have been enough so none more needed, just adding to the list....
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|