racist administration bans menthol and flavored tobacco

[BIG RED]

Originally Posted by Bustin Stones

By black market, you mean a market for black people? Because this is obviously a hate crime.

I'm the "Jerks" cousin , I like Newports

[Inner Dirt]

Originally Posted by davew

Would that be like taking a shower with your daughter?


Who was the person NYC killed because he resisted arrest for selling onesies?

What? I am real confused here. What does onesie guy have to do with molesting children?


Also as long as your daughter is a small child and your hands and junk aren't around her private parts I don't see a problem.




My sister who watched too much Oprah accused my 60 year old step dad of molesting my two year old niece, decades ago. He immediately volunteered for a lie detector test and said he would pay for it. The mess her crap caused an innocent man had a big effect on everyone, my sister was also an obvious drug addict, that did not matter to the cops.


Fast forward a half dozen years I am babysitting my best friend's 4 year old daughter. She is in the bathroom saying I need to come help her as her zipper is stuck, she is like one of my own. I am at the door trying to avoid going in,
she keeps yelling she is about to pee her pants and needs help. I reluctantly go in and help, if that crap did not happen to my step dad I would have thought nothing of helping a 4 year old use the restroom.

[Redboard]

Remember the lawsuit that the Clinton administration filed against the tobacco companies for " long term costs related to treating ill smokers covered by the government health programs."

Well they got around $250B for it. But in reality, it's cheaper for medicare/medicaid/ etc. if someone dies at 65 from smoking than living to 85 and dying from stroke or other natural causes.

I guess then using the government's logic, we ought to be paying the tobacco companies for the health care savings.

[Bustin Stones]

Originally Posted by Redboard

Remember the lawsuit that the Clinton administration filed against the tobacco companies for " long term costs related to treating ill smokers covered by the government health programs."

Well they got around $250B for it. But in reality, it's cheaper for medicare/medicaid/ etc. if someone dies at 65 from smoking than living to 85 and dying from stroke or other natural causes.

I guess then using the government's logic, we ought to be paying the tobacco companies for the health care savings.

Are you familiar with what it costs to treat someone with lung disease or other results of tobacco? I am not. It sounds like you have put pencil to paper.

[davew]

Originally Posted by Bustin Stones

Are you familiar with what it costs to treat someone with lung disease or other results of tobacco? I am not. It sounds like you have put pencil to paper.

so hard to figure ALL the costs including the pyramid scheme FDR signed called the social security act of 1935.