More liberal media distortions "slavery is good history"

[Jess Hawsen Arown]

The liberal media is at it again -- as if it ever stopped.

We have all heard it by now. Former Trump spokesperson said


After Osefo explained some of the dark history behind Confederate monuments—including ties to the Ku Klux Klan’s opposition to black political leaders, she said, “While it is a piece of American history, it’s not necessarily the good part of American history. So it doesn’t deserve a place on state grounds. It deserves a place in museums. And that’s where they need to be.”

Pierson countered, “It absolutely deserves a place because bad history is still good history for this country…”

Only the wackadoodle liberals would translate good history to mean that slavery is good. It was clear to me what she meant when she said it. It was about history being a good teacher. Most of history we learn is based upon bad events. Slavery. The holocaust. Nazis. Communism. Hitler, Amin, Stalin, Saddam -- ad nauseum.

The Nazis are evil. Learning about Nazis so we can combat it is critical.
Slavery is evil. Learning about slavery so we can combat it is critical.

History is the greatest of all teachers. All history is good history, regardless of the evil we are studying.

Please note, I am not taking a position whether or not some symbols of the confederacy should be removed. This is all about the lying liberal media and the word games they play to distort the truth and sell their failed agenda.

[fast4522]

Originally Posted by Jess Hawsen Arown

The liberal media is at it again -- as if it ever stopped.

We have all heard it by now. Former Trump spokesperson said


After Osefo explained some of the dark history behind Confederate monuments—including ties to the Ku Klux Klan’s opposition to black political leaders, she said, “While it is a piece of American history, it’s not necessarily the good part of American history. So it doesn’t deserve a place on state grounds. It deserves a place in museums. And that’s where they need to be.”

Pierson countered, “It absolutely deserves a place because bad history is still good history for this country…”

Only the wackadoodle liberals would translate good history to mean that slavery is good. It was clear to me what she meant when she said it. It was about history being a good teacher. Most of history we learn is based upon bad events. Slavery. The holocaust. Nazis. Communism. Hitler, Amin, Stalin, Saddam -- ad nauseum.

The Nazis are evil. Learning about Nazis so we can combat it is critical.
Slavery is evil. Learning about slavery so we can combat it is critical.

History is the greatest of all teachers. All history is good history, regardless of the evil we are studying.

Please note, I am not taking a position whether or not some symbols of the confederacy should be removed. This is all about the lying liberal media and the word games they play to distort the truth and sell their failed agenda.

In their pea of a brain it is all about them, these Confederate monuments were put in place by them and they represent their hero's of the time. The target of these people is not Robert E. Lee, it is George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. Just a diversion to save their scumbag methodology of complete subjugation. To tear this country apart from within and turn control over to the ruling class the Builderburg Group. Can't anyone here understand why George Soros was doing everything he could to get Clinton elected, this country dodged a bullet of very ugly proportions. Only the weak minded can fall for that Confederate monument crap.

[woodtoo]

Two great posts back to back.