Discussion of the Mueller Report

[Burls]

Why bother to ACTUALLY READ the Mueller Report when famed legal scholar Doofus J Drumph will TELL you what to think?

[MargieRose]

Originally Posted by MargieRose

In case you missed Mark Levin tonight...spot-on 'Mueller Report' discussion with former VA AG, Ken Cuccinelli...
https://youtu.be/0kh5fsR8KBA

Here's that pesky disappearing video again:

YouTube (Short URL)

[elysiantraveller]

Oooof...

Mueller complained that Barr’s letter did not capture ‘context’ of Trump probe

You guys should probably read the report...

Haha I'm kidding... nothing with change your minds!

[Burls]

Originally Posted by elysiantraveller

Oooof...

Mueller complained that Barr’s letter did not capture ‘context’ of Trump probe

You guys should probably read the report...

Haha I'm kidding... nothing with change your minds!

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress
and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24
did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance
of this office’s work and conclusions,”

Mueller wrote in the March 27 letter, according to the Post.

“There is now public confusion about critical aspects of
the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine
a central purpose for which the Department appointed
the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence
in the outcome of the investigations.”



Uh Oh!
Be on the lookout for a late night tweet explosion.

[elysiantraveller]

Originally Posted by Burls

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress
and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24
did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance
of this office’s work and conclusions,”

Mueller wrote in the March 27 letter, according to the Post.

“There is now public confusion about critical aspects of
the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine
a central purpose for which the Department appointed
the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence
in the outcome of the investigations.”



Uh Oh!
Be on the lookout for a late night tweet explosion.

Tsk tsk...

https://twitter.com/ABCPolitics/status/1116019277734318081

__________________
Dumbest timeline confirmed...

[Burls]

Twitter

Ya beat me to the punch, Ely.

[elysiantraveller]

File under PA-OT posters opinions not aging well..

Originally Posted by elysiantraveller

I think Barr's comments today were very much being a Trump lackey...

Language matters and the language he uses matters.

He's good though.

Originally Posted by jocko699

AG Barr never has nor ever will be anyone's lackey. You should be ashamed to even think that!

[MargieRose]

Originally Posted by elysiantraveller

File under PA-OT posters opinions not aging well..

You come across just like Joy Behar, whenever some kind of so-thought gotcha moment blows in. You two must be related.

[Burls]

Originally Posted by Greyfox

Come down ely from the gum tree.
The only question of relevance now is Did Trump break the Law?
Answer: No. (That was the finding of a man far more qualified to decide that than you and me.

That was the declaration of a man far more UNSCRUPULOUS than Bernie Madoff.

[elysiantraveller]

Originally Posted by MargieRose

You come across just like Joy Behar, whenever some kind of so-thought gotcha moment blows in. You two must be related.

You mean the exact thing I've been arguing with people about since March?

I'll stick with calling you all sheep...

Some more posts not "aged" so well...

Originally Posted by elysiantraveller

Some Mueller team members say final report more damaging to Trump than Barr summary suggests: NY Times

Originally Posted by davew

of course, now that it has been reported on CNN, MSNBC, yahoo news, msn news, .... it is as good as fact???

it is only matter of time, in less than 2 weeks it will be released (what is legal to release)

Originally Posted by Tom

Oh my!
A consensus of peer-reviewed alleged news outlets!
If multiple news groups are reporting it, you can pretty much bet it is a coordinated lie.

It all comes from an unnamed source - some sleazy lawyer.

Originally Posted by OntheRail

Notice how they named on one (no surprise there)... just member of Mueller's Team. Leaves one to ask... did they really talk to anyone or is it more of the exceptional journalism that we've seen the past few years. Really I think they should rename it The Puttzer Prise.

Maybe #FakeNews isn't so fake?

You all are hilarious...

[davew]

Originally Posted by Burls

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress
and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24
did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance
of this office’s work and conclusions,”

Mueller wrote in the March 27 letter, according to the Post.

“There is now public confusion about critical aspects of
the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine
a central purpose for which the Department appointed
the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence
in the outcome of the investigations.”



Uh Oh!
Be on the lookout for a late night tweet explosion.

Wouldn't it bee amazing if Mueller tells Congress he did not write that letter.

[Burls]

Originally Posted by davew

Wouldn't it bee amazing if Mueller tells Congress he did not write that letter.

That would be amazing.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by davew

Wouldn't it bee amazing if Mueller tells Congress he did not write that letter.

It would be more amazing if you maudlin Chumpites could possibly remove your lips from your Kings rear end.

What's really interesting ios this story breaks the night before the "Coverup general" gets set to be grilled by the senate. Mueller who ran a leak proof investigation, no one on his crew said a word, gave the Wash Post the letter he wrote to the "Coverup general" himself.

As reckless says, he must be a Trump hater
.

[hcap]

When it rains on Trump et al, it pours......

U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan ruled against President Donald Trump and allowed a lawsuit by Congressional Democrats to proceed, The Washington Post reported on Tuesday.

Unless the Department of Justice appeals, the ruling will allow Democrats to seek disclosure of documents from the Trump Organization.

“The lawsuit is one of two landmark cases against Trump relying on the once-obscure emoluments clauses of the Constitution. In a case brought in Maryland by the attorneys general of D.C. and Maryland, Justice Department lawyers representing the president have succeeded in temporarily blocking subpoenas for financial records and other documents related to Trump’s D.C. hotel,” The Post explained. “The congressional case, brought by about 200 Democrats, extends beyond the hotel and provides a potential new avenue for the president’s challengers to gain access to a broader array of Trump’s closely held finances.”

Trump’s legal defense was described by the judge as being “unpersuasive and inconsistent.”

“The Court is persuaded that the text and structure of the Clause, together with the other uses of the term in the Constitution, support plaintiffs’ definition of ‘Emolument’ rather than that of the President,” Sullivan ruled.

[hcap]

Rudy, Rudy, Rudy...


Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani tells Robert Mueller to quit ‘whining’
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/04/tru...-quit-whining/

President Donald Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani spoke to CNN Tuesday in wake of the news that special counsel Robert Mueller was angry about Attorney General Bill Barr’s misleading summary.

According to Giuliani, Mueller had the chance to prosecute Trump and clearly decided not to. As a result, he should stop complaining.

“Mueller should have made a decision,” Giuliani told CNN’s Pamela Brown via phone. “And shouldn’t be complaining or whining now that he didn’t get described correctly.”

Giuliani thinks Mueller shouldn’t have written the public letter to the attorney general expressing his displeasure.