|
|
07-25-2019, 06:04 PM
|
#1531
|
Quintessential guru
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,254
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by formula_2002
Don't forget the bit of help from Russia
|
What bit?
Mueller's prosecutors admitted they had no evidence showing that the so-called bot farm had been connected to the Russian government. Even mostpost knows that Mueller had no evidence connecting these 13 individuals to the Russian government.
If you mean the 13 individuals who tried to help Trump's bid through social media postings, then I agree there may have been very little help (a bit) from 13 individual Russians, assuming they are citizens of Russia.
Since you responded to this latest post of mine and not an earlier one, I want to make sure your did not miss my question to you from post 1523.
Here is my question, I asked you to answer, contained in post 1523.
A person is testifying about his activity and during his testimony said person states the ways a third-party could obstruct the activity and prevent the activity from being completed. The person testifying about his activity is asked; Did anyone hinder you from completing your activity?
The person replies no. What is the logical conclusion? Was the person hindered or not?
Last edited by Show Me the Wire; 07-25-2019 at 06:07 PM.
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 06:36 PM
|
#1532
|
what an easy game.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,096
|
If you are making a reference to a portion of the Mueller report, show me the citation
__________________
Peace on earth, good will to all
GOD BLESS AMERICA
" I pass with relief from the tossing sea of cause and theory to the firm ground of result and fact"
Winston Churchill
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 06:54 PM
|
#1533
|
Quintessential guru
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,254
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by formula_2002
If you are making a reference to a portion of the Mueller report, show me the citation
|
I am not referencing a written report. I am asking you for your "logical" answer to a very simple question. A question so simple it only requires a one word response.
Again the simple question: A person is testifying about his activity and during his testimony said person states the ways a third-party could obstruct the activity and prevent the activity from being completed. The person testifying about his activity is asked; Did anyone hinder you from completing your activity?
The person replies no. What is the logical conclusion? Was the person hindered or not?
Last edited by Show Me the Wire; 07-25-2019 at 07:00 PM.
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 07:23 PM
|
#1534
|
what an easy game.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,096
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Show Me the Wire
I am not referencing a written report. I am asking you for your "logical" answer to a very simple question. A question so simple it only requires a one word response.
Again the simple question: A person is testifying about his activity and during his testimony said person states the ways a third-party could obstruct the activity and prevent the activity from being completed. The person testifying about his activity is asked; Did anyone hinder you from completing your activity?
The person replies no. What is the logical conclusion? Was the person hindered or not?
|
why ask me the question?
__________________
Peace on earth, good will to all
GOD BLESS AMERICA
" I pass with relief from the tossing sea of cause and theory to the firm ground of result and fact"
Winston Churchill
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 07:40 PM
|
#1535
|
Quintessential guru
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,254
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by formula_2002
why ask me the question?
|
Why are you avoiding answering a simple question? If you read my original post, 1523, you know why I am asking you the question.
BTW the allegations in that thumbnail have not been proven. First, I already told you the government, Mueller's team, had no evidence of Russian Government involvement with the so called Russian bots.
Second, neither the FBI nor Mueller's team inspect the DNC computers, so Mueller has no investigatory evidence to prove the DNC servers were hacked. Mueller is relying on the word of DNC 3rd party vendor that the Russians hacked the DNC server and "reporting" by the media.
Mueller's report is riddled with unsubstantiated claims, major omissions of material facts and incomplete in its scope as it relies on reporting by the media and excluded any investigation into the Russian influence regarding Steele and fusion gps.
Last edited by Show Me the Wire; 07-25-2019 at 07:51 PM.
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 08:24 PM
|
#1536
|
what an easy game.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,096
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Show Me the Wire
Why are you avoiding answering a simple question? If you read my original post, 1523, you know why I am asking you the question.
BTW the allegations in that thumbnail have not been proven. First, I already told you the government, Mueller's team, had no evidence of Russian Government involvement with the so called Russian bots.
Second, neither the FBI nor Mueller's team inspect the DNC computers, so Mueller has no investigatory evidence to prove the DNC servers were hacked. Mueller is relying on the word of DNC 3rd party vendor that the Russians hacked the DNC server and "reporting" by the media.
Mueller's report is riddled with unsubstantiated claims, major omissions of material facts and incomplete in its scope as it relies on reporting by the media and excluded any investigation into the Russian influence regarding Steele and fusion gps.
|
I find your question , boring and poorly framed. Give me something more challenging.
So you don't think the Russians interfered with the 2016 election?
Good luck with that. You are wasting your time here.
__________________
Peace on earth, good will to all
GOD BLESS AMERICA
" I pass with relief from the tossing sea of cause and theory to the firm ground of result and fact"
Winston Churchill
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 08:35 PM
|
#1537
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,487
|
The Russians try to interfere with all elections, we just do not think it is something that you have any credibility connecting to Trump. Most feel Clinton was dirty as shit paying for garbage to give your party a leg up, setups by a failed candidate that all tracks back to her.
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 08:37 PM
|
#1538
|
Quintessential guru
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,254
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by formula_2002
I find your question , boring and poorly framed. Give me something more challenging.
So you don't think the Russians interfered with the 2016 election?
Good luck with that. You are wasting your time here.
|
Your unwillingness to answer a simple question speaks volumes.
Why do you thing the Russians interfered, if Mueller's crack investigatory team could not find evidence of interference by Russia.
Show me the actual evidence, before you ask me to believe. Media reporting is not evidence and allegations are only allegations until proven with evidence.
The real question is why would a logical person believe a story unsupported by actual evidence?
Last edited by Show Me the Wire; 07-25-2019 at 08:40 PM.
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 09:18 PM
|
#1539
|
Quintessential guru
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,254
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by formula_2002
I find your question , boring and poorly framed. Give me something more challenging.
So you don't think the Russians interfered with the 2016 election?
Good luck with that. You are wasting your time here.
|
By wasting my time, do you mean you are incapable of participating in a reasonable and logical discussion?
I offered legitimate objections to Mueller's report, i.e. relying on media reports, no first hand investigatory action, and Mueller's crack investigation team admits it has no evidence of Russian government interference and you question why I may not believe a story?
Why would a reasonable person ask me such a question, especially after I listed the reasons for my skepticism? Instead of accusing me of being a denier, why don't you address the objections with factual evidence to prove the assertions you want me to believe? Maybe because you have none?
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 09:48 PM
|
#1540
|
Quintessential guru
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,254
|
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 10:24 PM
|
#1541
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,651
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by formula_2002
I find your question , boring and poorly framed. Give me something more challenging.
So you don't think the Russians interfered with the 2016 election?
Good luck with that. You are wasting your time here.
|
Wow, you are in for some mighty, mighty, DEEP, soul-scorching awakenings soon.
I kinda feel sorry for you at this point.
When the actual truth finally comes to light, I am going to guess we'll never see you around these parts ever again. The guilt and shame of being so wrong, and so gullible, will be impossible to overcome.
Just to prove my point, and I know you won't agree with this, but your judgement is beyond clouded at this point, so it doesn't matter.
You are a MILLION times DEEPER into your end of things, then I will ever be into Trump. If Trump were to resign or go to prison tomorrow, I can say with 100% confidence I could shrug it off in a day...maybe two...chalk it up to the corrupt system once again getting its way, and move on.
But you...look at you...this ENTIRE THREAD of yours...non-stop...ALL-IN...DEEP...it's kind of insane actually, that one man, even the President of the United States, has this much of an effect on you.
A little scary. Time to get some perspective.
Last edited by PaceAdvantage; 07-25-2019 at 10:28 PM.
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 10:27 PM
|
#1542
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReplayRandall
You're playing a bad hand and trying to bluff.....Throw it in the muck....Save yourself the humiliation.
|
Formula has already been warned....Oh well, some never learn....It's his funeral with no attendees...Sad.
Last edited by ReplayRandall; 07-25-2019 at 10:31 PM.
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 10:42 PM
|
#1543
|
what an easy game.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,096
|
Wow, I think you all need to take a breath. Just google bipartisan agreement
That Russia interference in the 2016 election
Then take another breath.
__________________
Peace on earth, good will to all
GOD BLESS AMERICA
" I pass with relief from the tossing sea of cause and theory to the firm ground of result and fact"
Winston Churchill
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 11:02 PM
|
#1544
|
what an easy game.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,096
|
fyi
__________________
Peace on earth, good will to all
GOD BLESS AMERICA
" I pass with relief from the tossing sea of cause and theory to the firm ground of result and fact"
Winston Churchill
|
|
|
07-25-2019, 11:05 PM
|
#1545
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by formula_2002
fyi
|
CNN??... ....Surprised they didn't say 99% to 1%….
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|