Global Warming, Make That Climate Change Yeah

[hcap]

Originally Posted by boxcar

That's nice. All a bunch of socialist countries promoting their socialism, for which they need lots of money, which they get from tax dollars. How else are they going to increase taxes drastically if they can't push their Chicken Little agenda upon the masses?

Furthermore, this list is a deflection. We were talking about 78 member nations of the U.N. that got their models all wrong. Only Russia got it right.
And I'll tell you why Russia got it right because you won't! Russia is communist country with an authoritarian government, so their scientists don't have to fudge their numbers to fool anyone. This is why the Russian model was so accurate.

In fact, neither Russia or China buy into this scam! China simply plays lip service to the Paris Accords but has no intentions of actually cutting its emissions. All China is doing is playing along to get along with its huge worldwide customer base. China, as a world power, doesn't want to be perceived as a rogue nation on this issue and risk losing any of its customers.

https://www.dailysignal.com/2017/06/...ferent-intent/

So...when it comes down to it -- the big 3 Superpowers are not buying it.

So because they are not buying the consensus, the Russians and Chinese are correct.? Man, you allege all the international scientific organizations are commies and socialist.......but absolutely love you some Ruskies and Chinese commie and socialist autocrats and totalitarian, the most inhuman barbarians since the Nazsis. And we should believe you have the faintest idea of what you babble

We are finished.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by boxcar

It's not my claim. It's the claim of reputable scientists who aren't on any government's payroll.

Your reputable pseudo-scientists also said there was no warming in 17 years. Go back on your reservation. Facts are only incidental to conspiracy theories there.

Not here.

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by hcap

Your reputable pseudo-scientists also said there was no warming in 17 years. Go back on your reservation. Facts are only incidental to conspiracy theories there.

Not here.

No,they didn't. You're lying. They said there was a 9/10th degree Celsius increase, which came in way under all the other nations' predictive models, save for Russia's.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by boxcar

No,they didn't. You're lying. They said there was a 9/10th degree Celsius increase, which came in way under all the other nations' predictive models, save for Russia's.

THEN YOU GOT IT WRONG IN ADDITION TO THEIR SILLY 9/10 OF A DEGREE. That is way warmer than the 20th century average. So 9/10 th Cent is not trivial bunky

Totally bollixed-up-car
Let me give you a clue you arrogant, condescending know-it-all: What you actually know about the real world wouldn't fill a thimble. In fact, if you had an honest bone in your body and you wanted to know the truth of the matter, you could have gotten off your , lazy butt and searched for the answer on the web.

Climate Scientist: 73 UN Climate Models Wrong, No Global Warming in 17 Years

(CNSNews.com) – Global temperatures collected in five official databases confirm that there has been no statistically significant global warming for the past 17 years, according to Dr. John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama Huntsville (UAH).

I repeat

February 6, 2019
The last five years were the hottest ever recorded
The planet is warming up, and there’s no sign of stopping.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/e...-nasa-reports/

According to new reports published Wednesday, the last five years—from 2014 to 2018—are the warmest years ever recorded in the 139 years that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has tracked global heat. And 2018 was the fourth hottest year ever recorded.

Global air temperatures have warmed steadily over past decades, shifting up and down slightly from year to year depending on natural climate oscillations like El Niño, but following a consistent upward path. Land temperatures, they said, were more than two degrees Fahrenheit warmer than the 20th century average.

“It’s a long-term trip up the elevator of warming,” says Deke Arndt, the chief of the global monitoring branch of NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information in North Carolina.

[hcap]

We are finished. Next step is iggy.

[Tom]

Cool, dude.
The red in your charts looks like the NY skyline!
Is the blue Atlantis?

Maybe Atlantis sinking is causing the oceans to rise.
Makes scientific sense.

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by hcap

THEN YOU GOT IT WRONG IN ADDITION TO THEIR SILLY 9/10 OF A DEGREE. That is way warmer than the 20th century average. So 9/10 th Cent is not trivial bunky
I repeat

The only one around here who is getting it wrong is YOU! The topic Michaels and other scientists discussed is that 78 nations' models were way off the mark -- 3 to 4 times higher than what the actual rise was for a 17-year period. Again, save for Russia. Russia's model predicted a 1 degree C rise.

In other words, all those 78 nations' scientists were to up their eyebrows in horse manure when they made their stupid, absurd models.

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by hcap

We are finished. Next step is iggy.

Is that a threat or a promise, Mr. Empty Suit?

[hcap]

Iggy has arrived. "Boxhead" is gone

[hcap]

Originally Posted by Tom

Cool, dude.
The red in your charts looks like the NY skyline!
Is the blue Atlantis?

Maybe Atlantis sinking is causing the oceans to rise.
Makes scientific sense.

Your two Bens should work for NOAA and NASA and maybe they can fix the charts. However they first must understand what they are fixing. "Temp. anomalies" are above their pay grade

Maybe you and box can set them straight. Take a refresher course on converting centigrade to Fahrenheit. Box need a good deal of help.

Or the blind leading the blind, leading the Bens.

[46zilzal]

hcap I admire your adherence to provable fact, but convincing these is a hopeless effort

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by hcap

Iggy has arrived. "Boxhead" is gone

Yeah, until he isn't, like all the other iggy times.

[Tom]

Originally Posted by 46zilzal

hcap I admire your adherence to provable fact, but convincing these is a hopeless effort

Provable fact - the cure for GW is a fraud. Those calling for it are not living it themselves. It is a lot of money for some, and they are willing to do whatever it takes to get it. When . leaders do not walk the talk, they are frauds.

When GW is addressed seriously by all of our leaders, we might pay attention.

Frankly, I don't care if it gets warmer and species go extinct. Extinction is the norm - over 99% of all species that lived are now gone. It is natural for species to die off as the world evolves and changes. You guys are missing a lot of the science.

[delayjf]

Mann sycophant HCAP trusts NASA after they've were busted for falsifying temp data TWICE.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ge-data-again/

And again

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/...n-record-claim

[davew]

Originally Posted by delayjf

Mann sycophant HCAP trusts NASA after they've were busted for falsifying temp data TWICE.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ge-data-again/

And again

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/...n-record-claim

are these provable facts? why would they need to falsify data when they already are part of the consensus? is the consensus ever wrong?