Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 17 votes, 4.76 average.
Old 03-20-2018, 12:16 PM   #4216
JustRalph
Just another Facist
 
JustRalph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,759
Now that’s funny!
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
JustRalph is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-20-2018, 01:14 PM   #4217
woodtoo
Registered User
 
woodtoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker View Post
This?

Just like real life, her shoe fell off.
woodtoo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2018, 06:43 AM   #4218
upthecreek
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,956
Former communications directors dump on her

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journal...d-behind-back/
upthecreek is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2018, 09:28 AM   #4219
upthecreek
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,956
Always has been a POS

upthecreek is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2018, 09:57 AM   #4220
JustRalph
Just another Facist
 
JustRalph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,759
She needs to keep talking

It’s great for campaigns against Dems


https://youtube.com/watch?v=QZuAsNXe...ature=youtu.be
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
JustRalph is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2018, 10:37 AM   #4221
FantasticDan
gelding
 
FantasticDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,883
Clinton didn't volunteer to be his lawyer, she was assigned by a judge. Clinton didn't want to represent the guy, and requested that the judge replace her. He did not. This has all been corroborated by the prosecutor in the case, who's the one who recommended Clinton to the judge in the first place.

The result of the case was the defendant being granted a plea by the prosecution, and serving one year in jail and four years probation.

These are all simple facts, I don't know why anyone would suggest otherwise.


Quote:
Originally Posted by upthecreek View Post
FantasticDan is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2018, 11:18 AM   #4222
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by upthecreek View Post
Comms director is dumping on Hillary? Not really...Comms director is once again blaming the American people for "not getting" what a "woman in charge" should be/look/act like...

Like we're all idiotic assholes who have never supported or even seen the COUNTLESS women in positions of political power in the USA and around the world over our lifetimes.

Ever heard of Sarah Palin? We had her up for Vice President...she wasn't torn apart by misogynistic asshole Republicans. She was torn apart by misogynistic ASSHOLE DEMOCRATS.

Last edited by PaceAdvantage; 03-21-2018 at 11:19 AM.
PaceAdvantage is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2018, 11:43 AM   #4223
upthecreek
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,956
Quote:
Originally Posted by FantasticDan View Post
Clinton didn't volunteer to be his lawyer, she was assigned by a judge. Clinton didn't want to represent the guy, and requested that the judge replace her. He did not. This has all been corroborated by the prosecutor in the case, who's the one who recommended Clinton to the judge in the first place.

The result of the case was the defendant being granted a plea by the prosecution, and serving one year in jail and four years probation.

These are all simple facts, I don't know why anyone would suggest otherwise.
So the woman involved is lying according to you? I'll take her word for it over yours.
upthecreek is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2018, 12:10 PM   #4224
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,617
Quote:
Originally Posted by FantasticDan View Post
Clinton didn't volunteer to be his lawyer, she was assigned by a judge. Clinton didn't want to represent the guy, and requested that the judge replace her. He did not. This has all been corroborated by the prosecutor in the case, who's the one who recommended Clinton to the judge in the first place.

The result of the case was the defendant being granted a plea by the prosecution, and serving one year in jail and four years probation.

These are all simple facts, I don't know why anyone would suggest otherwise.
So when DIMS repeat the same lie enough times, it becomes simple facts?
SIMPLE FACTS for SIMPLE DIMS......

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ew-guilty.html

davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2018, 12:41 PM   #4225
FantasticDan
gelding
 
FantasticDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew View Post
So when DIMS repeat the same lie enough times, it becomes simple facts?
SIMPLE FACTS for SIMPLE DIMS......
I don't know what you think that interview proves, but everything I said is a matter of public record. You can even see the final judgement for yourself here, as well as other details.

https://www.factcheck.org/2016/06/cl...975-rape-case/
FantasticDan is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2018, 12:45 PM   #4226
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,447
Proof in liberal world means nothing (see above).

Non-proof in liberal world means everything (see current Trump Russia investigation)
PaceAdvantage is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2018, 12:52 PM   #4227
FantasticDan
gelding
 
FantasticDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
Proof in liberal world means nothing (see above).
Proof of what? That in 1975, Attorney Hillary Rodham was assigned to defend an accused rapist, who was found guilty of a lesser charge via a plea deal with the prosecutor?

Yep, that happened. What about it?
FantasticDan is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2018, 02:23 PM   #4228
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,617
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
Proof in liberal world means nothing (see above).

Non-proof in liberal world means everything (see current Trump Russia investigation)
Only dim propaganda sites like factcheck.org or snopes can say what is true.

I am sure glad the country is spending $20K per day for Hillary's security detail while she is on her world tour.
davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2018, 04:42 PM   #4229
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by FantasticDan View Post
Proof of what? That in 1975, Attorney Hillary Rodham was assigned to defend an accused rapist, who was found guilty of a lesser charge via a plea deal with the prosecutor?

Yep, that happened. What about it?
The problem is she knew he was guilty of raping a child but she still did her best to get him off.

As a lawyer she did her job.

As a human being, she's excrement.

But we already knew that because she stands by her husband for political reasons even though he's guilty of all sorts of sexual misconduct and accused by more than one woman of rape.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-21-2018, 05:19 PM   #4230
FantasticDan
gelding
 
FantasticDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper View Post
The problem is she knew he was guilty of raping a child but she still did her best to get him off. As a lawyer she did her job. As a human being, she's excrement.
Yep, any defense attorney who may have a personal opinion of their client's innocence or guilt, and yet still performs their duty as required by law, is excrement.

Gotcha.
FantasticDan is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.