|
|
02-13-2009, 03:25 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NY USA
Posts: 974
|
Lower Minimums Destroy Handle; Magna 5
Here is a good example of lower minimums destroying handle.
Quote:
This year, the first Magna 5 was on January 24 with handle of only $431,780. This was the second lowest in Magna 5 history, from 50 runnings. On January 31, a new low was set when the Magna 5 only handled $402,677 -- the lowest ever -- until last week when a new low was set as the Magna 5 dipped below $400K for the first time; $399,437.
In 2007, the 10 runnings of the Magna 5 averaged $589,411 with one carryover week. In 2008, the nine runnings of the Magna 5 averaged $535,019 with one carryover week. So far this year, the three runnings of the Magna 5 averaged $415,608, which is a 22.32 percent decline from the 2008 averages and a 29.49 percent from 2007. Considering that total handle nationwide in the month of January was only down 2 percent and that Gulfstream, which usually hosts at least two of the races, has shown increases in business this year, it would make sense that these declines are due to the lowering of the $2 bet minimum to $1.
|
__________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." G.K. Chesterton
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 03:47 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 152
|
MAYBE NOT
It cannot be argued that PK6 carryovers do not guarantee dramatic pool increases, but as to the Magna PK5 , race selection and placement may be responsible for pool decline. There is no reason not to offer a fifty cent minimum on a non carryover bet like the PK4.
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 03:53 PM
|
#3
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 734
|
Then again
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjorio
It cannot be argued that PK6 carryovers do not guarantee dramatic pool increases, but as to the Magna PK5 , race selection and placement may be responsible for pool decline. There is no reason not to offer a fifty cent minimum on a non carryover bet like the PK4.
|
I think maybe there is.
Say the base wager on a p-4 is $1 with no $.50 bet available.. No one has 4 of 4. So, they pay off on 3 of 4. The pool (less takeout, of course) gets paid.
Now, say the base wager is $1 with $.50 available. There are no $1 tickets with 4 of 4. There is one $.50 ticket with 4 of 4. The $.50 ticket gets paid 1/2 of the net pool.
What happens to the other 1/2 of the pool?
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 03:59 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NY USA
Posts: 974
|
Seriously if a 50 cent ticket gets the whole pool, he gets the whole pool. The payout would read $200,000 for a $1 pick4 and the 50 cent ticket holder would collect $100,000 in the $100,000(minus takeout) pool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba X
I think maybe there is.
Say the base wager on a p-4 is $1 with no $.50 bet available.. No one has 4 of 4. So, they pay off on 3 of 4. The pool (less takeout, of course) gets paid.
Now, say the base wager is $1 with $.50 available. There are no $1 tickets with 4 of 4. There is one $.50 ticket with 4 of 4. The $.50 ticket gets paid 1/2 of the net pool.
What happens to the other 1/2 of the pool?
|
__________________
"A dead thing can go with the stream, but only a living thing can go against it." G.K. Chesterton
Last edited by PaceAdvantage; 02-13-2009 at 06:53 PM.
Reason: Seriously, no political comments in the horse racing section...thank you.
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 04:00 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 152
|
The entire pool minus takeout is always paid out .Ther is no PK4 carryover.
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 04:02 PM
|
#6
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 734
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by samyn on the green
Seriously if a 50 cent ticket gets the whole pool, he gets the whole pool. The payout would read $200,000 for a $1 pick4 and the 50 cent ticket holder would collect $100,000 in the $100,000(minus takeout) pool.
|
Are you certain of that?
Does the same hold true on a $.10 superfecta?
Last edited by PaceAdvantage; 02-13-2009 at 06:53 PM.
Reason: Edit quote
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 04:05 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,352
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba X
Are you certain of that?
Does the same hold true on a $.10 superfecta?
|
Yes, and yes.
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 04:06 PM
|
#8
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 734
|
ok, thanks and thanks.
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 04:08 PM
|
#9
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba X
I think maybe there is.
Say the base wager on a p-4 is $1 with no $.50 bet available.. No one has 4 of 4. So, they pay off on 3 of 4. The pool (less takeout, of course) gets paid.
Now, say the base wager is $1 with $.50 available. There are no $1 tickets with 4 of 4. There is one $.50 ticket with 4 of 4. The $.50 ticket gets paid 1/2 of the net pool.
What happens to the other 1/2 of the pool?
|
Wow! You honestly thought half the pool didn't get paid?
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 04:11 PM
|
#10
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 734
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
Wow! You honestly thought half the pool didn't get paid?
|
Yes, honestly. I've never bet a superfecta or a p-3 or p-4 in my life. Glad to wow you.
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 04:20 PM
|
#11
|
Traded By Cubs
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: 2 miles north of Wrigley Field
Posts: 5,339
|
I'm thinking the 15-20% drop in handle might reflect the overall drop in handle nationwide, more than the change in the minimum bet size.
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 04:29 PM
|
#12
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve 'StatMan'
I'm thinking the 15-20% drop in handle might reflect the overall drop in handle nationwide, more than the change in the minimum bet size.
|
I was thinking the exact same thing. Also, I assume it is a little tougher for some people to get a bet down on Magna tracks this year.
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 05:42 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,991
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjorio
The entire pool minus takeout is always paid out .Ther is no PK4 carryover.
|
Except in New jersey where there is a carryover to the next p4.
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 05:52 PM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 983
|
I'm pretty sure the only possible explanation for the Magna 5 handle to be off would be because of weather and the economy.
Any track exec will tell you Mother Nature and the Stimulus Plan are our only hope to turn this ship around.
|
|
|
02-13-2009, 07:00 PM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 476
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba X
Are you certain of that?
Does the same hold true on a $.10 superfecta?
|
That's why you will sometimes see the payouts paying more than the total pool.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|