hydroxychloroquine fans

[delayjf]

Lots of Dr. are using this drug and swearing by it. The claims that hydroy is dangerous are unfounded given that it has been prescribed for years with minimum consequences for decades.

The recent study that determined hydroxy was ineffective / dangerous has since been withdrawn by its publishers.

https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/2020...oroquine-study

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by MargieRose

Your nurse sister is saying that hyroxy is given "until symptoms are gone" (pretty amazing), but you're saying that "it's not freaking effective"? So, who's right, you or your sister?

Careful there, you're beginning to talk like Biden.

Idiot. It’s not effective because people have serious side effects such as death before they are cured. Death is not a cure.

[RichieP]

Originally Posted by mostpost

To treat Covid 19, they administer 800 Mg.three times a week MWF until symptoms are gone. In other words in one week of Covid 19 treatment you receive as much Hydro as you do in seven weeks of Malaria treatment and the treatment continues for several weeks.

We are all aware that medications which are safe taken as directed can be fatal if abused.. also, it’s not freaking effective.

The prescribed dosage for prevention and help with the early symptoms (along with zinc and "Zyth") is 200mg 2x a week a HUGE difference from your post. This coming from a doctor with great success also and NOT the one most are focused on.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by boxcar

Respecting a doctor's opinion is one thing; accepting it blindly is something else, since to the best of my knowledge doctors, like the rest of us, are not infallible. Most wise and prudent people understand this and on important medical issues, seek more than one opinion.

Gee, and I thought you were infallible.

PS: Do you know the difference between expertise and full blown crackpottery? Lately you are having major difficulties keeping your pots from cracking

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by delayjf

Lots of Dr. are using this drug and swearing by it. The claims that hydroy is dangerous are unfounded given that it has been prescribed for years with minimum consequences for decades.

The recent study that determined hydroxy was ineffective / dangerous has since been withdrawn by its publishers.

https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/2020...oroquine-study

Seriously, try to pay attention. Hydro is now being used in doses six or more times what it was being used for previously.

As far as the study itself, it hasn’t been withdrawn by its creators. The Lancet journal has decided not to publish it because they could not peer review it. The reason they couldn’t do so is they couldn’t get access to proprietary information. There is as yet no proof the study is flawed or inaccurate.

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by hcap

Gee, and I thought you were infallible.

Next to you I am.

PS: Do you know the difference between expertise and full blown crackpottery? Lately you are having major difficulties keeping your pots from cracking

Do you know the difference between truth and con jobs? As demonstrated recently, public health figures have a huge credibility problem.

[JustRalph]

Originally Posted by RichieP

The prescribed dosage for prevention and help with the early symptoms (along with zinc and "Zyth") is 200mg 2x a week a HUGE difference from your post. This coming from a doctor with great success also and NOT the one most are focused on.

I’ve read this several places

[lamboguy]

if this thing does not get in your lungs, you don't need to take anything. if it does get in your lungs and nothing works, you might as well go with the hydy, you got nothing to lose.

[baconswitchfarm]

Originally Posted by mostpost

Seriously, try to pay attention. Hydro is now being used in doses six or more times what it was being used for previously.

As far as the study itself, it hasn’t been withdrawn by its creators. The Lancet journal has decided not to publish it because they could not peer review it. The reason they couldn’t do so is they couldn’t get access to proprietary information. There is as yet no proof the study is flawed or inaccurate.

No the Lancet did not say they couldn't get access to proprietary info. the quacks wouldn't provide The study materials at all. The phoney study people spun that lie to prevent people tearing their fake study apart. Proprietary info in the study of a 50 year old approved drug. ��
If you are as dumb as you pretend to be I'm betting nobody on your route ever got the right mail .

[delayjf]

Seriously, try to pay attention. Hydro is now being used in doses six or more times what it was being used for previously.

Indeed, the dosages used in the study are higher than the dosages used by Doctors who are treating their patience. Do you think they would stay with the treatment if 27% of their patience died as the study claims?

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...quine-n2566409

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by delayjf

Indeed, the dosages used in the study are higher than the dosages used by Doctors who are treating their patience. Do you think they would stay with the treatment if 27% of their patience died as the study claims?

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiep...quine-n2566409

Don't you know...all those doctors are"quacks"?

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by mostpost

Idiot.

That was uncalled for...you senior piece of trash.