 |
|
09-07-2018, 01:02 PM
|
#151
|
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Still can't completely verify that NYT op-ed piece is a mole letter penned by a USC student.....Turnitin.com did verify 100% plagiarism, just don't know who copied whom first. The NYT and the turnitin.com post are just too simultaneous. Who was the USC student? Who was the professor who received it? The timeline has to be taken apart, as this may be a nothing-burger.
|
|
|
|
09-07-2018, 03:48 PM
|
#152
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2018, 03:57 PM
|
#153
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,900
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReplayRandall
Still can't completely verify that NYT op-ed piece is a mole letter penned by a USC student.....Turnitin.com did verify 100% plagiarism, just don't know who copied whom first. The NYT and the turnitin.com post are just too simultaneous. Who was the USC student? Who was the professor who received it? The timeline has to be taken apart, as this may be a nothing-burger.
|
Can you expand on this, please. From where did you come across this information?
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2018, 04:01 PM
|
#154
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,504
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MargieRose
Can you expand on this, please. From where did you come across this information?
|
It's on the Internets
|
|
|
|
09-07-2018, 04:04 PM
|
#155
|
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,799
|
If the author is really serious about protecting the country from Trump, why write the oped? Why not keep quite and keep doing it?
Or, if he wants to take credit for being an American hero, why keep it anonymous?
Or, if it just some malcontent staffer with an ax to grind and no substance, wouldn't the way the op ed came to be fit perfectly?
Putting so much stock in an anonymous source seriously calls one's credibility into question.
Not that it applies to any of the fine, upstanding folks who post here, but out there......yowie! Lots of nutjobs running around.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2018, 04:44 PM
|
#156
|
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MargieRose
Can you expand on this, please. From where did you come across this information?
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2018, 09:30 PM
|
#157
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,900
|
WOW!...if this turns out to be true!
Thank you, ReplayRandall.
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2018, 09:47 PM
|
#158
|
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,799
|
I did not know Dan Rather was a student at USC?
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
|
09-08-2018, 01:20 AM
|
#159
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MargieRose
WOW!...if this turns out to be true!
Thank you, ReplayRandall.
|
The operative words. "If" and "true" Based on Randall's track record on "Q", I would be highly skeptical.
|
|
|
|
|
09-08-2018, 11:23 AM
|
#160
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,000
|
I am hearing the name ; Fiona Hill as the author. British born American foreign affairs specialist in Russian and Europe. Makes too much sense. 
Fiona knows missing professor Joseph Mifsud, Ivan Timofeev also Director Brookings Institute.
Last edited by woodtoo; 09-08-2018 at 11:30 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
09-08-2018, 11:33 AM
|
#161
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,000
|
POTUS did say it was probably a woman. Fiona Hill is the gal.
|
|
|
|
|
09-08-2018, 11:36 AM
|
#162
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,000
|
Fiona hired Pappadopoulos at Hudson Institute.
|
|
|
|
|
09-10-2018, 07:51 PM
|
#164
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,629
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
The operative words. "If" and "true" Based on Randall's track record on "Q", I would be highly skeptical.
|
It does not matter which anonymous sources the NYT have used, their new NYTanon will probably have a much better record than the Q anon. Time will tell, for those alive long enough to see it.
|
|
|
|
|
09-10-2018, 08:40 PM
|
#165
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
If the author is really serious about protecting the country from Trump, why write the oped? Why not keep quite and keep doing it?
Or, if he wants to take credit for being an American hero, why keep it anonymous?
Or, if it just some malcontent staffer with an ax to grind and no substance, wouldn't the way the op ed came to be fit perfectly?
Putting so much stock in an anonymous source seriously calls one's credibility into question.
Not that it applies to any of the fine, upstanding folks who post here, but out there......yowie! Lots of nutjobs running around.
|
I'll tell you why. Because it's phony.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Rate This Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
@
