 |
|
12-09-2020, 02:30 PM
|
#16
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
this fruitcake is suing over states that he has nothing to do with claiming that thee is harm to Texas due to the other states certifying their election results.
Houdini couldn't get this right leaning court to listen to that one in a million years.
these guys are insulting the intelligence of good conservative people that are making these cases up.
|
lamboguy v2.0
|
|
|
|
12-09-2020, 02:41 PM
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Western NY
Posts: 5,345
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
this fruitcake is suing over states that he has nothing to do with claiming that thee is harm to Texas due to the other states certifying their election results.
Houdini couldn't get this right leaning court to listen to that one in a million years.
these guys are insulting the intelligence of good conservative people that are making these cases up.
|
If a state holds a fraudulent election that changes the outcome of a national election, how is that not harming other states?
|
|
|
|
|
12-09-2020, 02:47 PM
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,569
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saratoga_Mike
How about a bet - if the Supreme Court overturns the election based on this suit, I'll never post again. If they don't, you agree to never post again. Please confirm the bet.  |
You act as if you have determined that Boxcar is a man of his word. Would you please abstain from forming baseless conclusions?
|
|
|
|
|
12-09-2020, 02:50 PM
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,764
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xtb
If a state holds a fraudulent election that changes the outcome of a national election, how is that not harming other states?
|
first of all the person that is representing the state that is claiming his state was harmed needs convincing evidence that it harmed his state. he is saying that another state's votes are more important than his.
if you allow a case like this, the Supreme Court will be compromised every single time there is an election and the loser wants to stall the process.
cases like this are demoralizing to the members of the Supreme Court. if they keep up with these cases i guarantee that good judges like Amy Barrett will resign from the court along with other justices.
|
|
|
|
|
12-09-2020, 02:55 PM
|
#20
|
|
velocitician
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,297
|
It appears the Supreme Court has spoken
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
|
|
|
|
|
12-09-2020, 03:02 PM
|
#21
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
if they keep up with these cases i guarantee that good judges like Amy Barrett will resign from the court along with other justices.
|
Wanna bet v2.0?
|
|
|
|
|
12-09-2020, 03:05 PM
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saratoga_Mike
1) There's an expectation that others states will join the suit. As of now, they have not.
2) Rep Kelly applied for injunctive relief on 12/3/20. It was denied on 12/8/20. That's expeditious in the case of the Supreme Court. The Texas suit was filed yesterday (12/8/20).
3) I think they're wrong.
How about a bet - if the Supreme Court overturns the election based on this suit, I'll never post again. If they don't, you agree to never post again. Please confirm the bet. |
#2: and YES, yesterday, 6 justices decided that the plaintiffs had standing, otherwise they would not have voted to actually hear the case. Whether a plaintiff has legal standing not is a fundamental prerequisite to a hearing. However, some constitutional scholars have opined that the SC, technically, has not agreed to hear the case per se. They only want to hear the defendants' side first. In other words the four defendants must reply by 3 P.M. Thursday -- then the court will decide whether to formally hear the case or not.
I already have a bet with Hcap, thank you. Besides, as significant as this upcoming SC case is, I have reason to believe it's not Trump's biggest canon.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
12-09-2020, 03:14 PM
|
#23
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
first of all the person that is representing the state that is claiming his state was harmed needs convincing evidence that it harmed his state. he is saying that another state's votes are more important than his.
if you allow a case like this, the Supreme Court will be compromised every single time there is an election and the loser wants to stall the process.
cases like this are demoralizing to the members of the Supreme Court. if they keep up with these cases i guarantee that good judges like Amy Barrett will resign from the court along with other justices.
|
No, he's not. He's saying that since the four states, and all the others for that matter, are part of the electoral college pool, how those states play the election game impacts all the other states. If a state doesn't follow the rules of the U.S. Constitution with respect to national elections and [b]apply their state rules according the U.S. Constitution, then that very obviously impacts the rest of the states.
If the Supreme Court does not take this case, the American People's will will have been compromised.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
12-09-2020, 03:28 PM
|
#24
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9,893
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
I already have a bet with Hcap, thank you. Besides, as significant as this upcoming SC case is, I have reason to believe it's not Trump's biggest canon.
|
Didn't know that.
Amicus brief from other states hit about 20 mins ago.
|
|
|
|
|
12-09-2020, 03:32 PM
|
#25
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,139
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
#2: and YES, yesterday, 6 justices decided that the plaintiffs had standing, otherwise they would not have voted to actually hear the case.
|
No such ruling. Already been debunked as fake news, otherwise post a link.
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
I already have a bet with Hcap, thank you.
|
B.S. You're scared. You know you have nothing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
I have reason to believe it's not Trump's biggest canon.
|
Even Trump says you lie.
This is the big one,” Trump wrote in a Twitter post Wednesday.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/09/trum...biden-win.html
|
|
|
|
|
12-09-2020, 03:50 PM
|
#26
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Light
|
The only thing fake around here are you commie-loving leftists.
Re my "lie": Are you aware that smart, savvy business people often employ the old boxer's head fake trick to throw off their opponents?
P.S. And if there was "no such ruling" as you claim, why would Trump post that "this is the big one"?
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
Last edited by boxcar; 12-09-2020 at 03:53 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
12-09-2020, 04:32 PM
|
#27
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7,139
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
P.S. And if there was "no such ruling" as you claim, why would Trump post that "this is the big one"?
|
Holy guacamole, are you juiced or what! You blended 2 separate issues into one!
I posted that Trump said "this is the big one" after you wrote "it's NOT Trump's biggest canon". In affect making you a liar of what Trump said.
The "no such ruling" has to do with your assertion that 6 SC justices ruled to hear the case when they never ruled on that and is a right wing debunked lie that you gobbled up. Making you a two timing liar.
|
|
|
|
|
12-09-2020, 04:33 PM
|
#28
|
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,813
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
lamboguy v2.0
|
Exactly what I was thinking. It’s so obvious
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
|
|
|
|
|
12-09-2020, 04:48 PM
|
#29
|
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,813
|
Some real shitty lawyers in here.
The first case involving PA wasn’t dismissed. The request for immediate relief was. The case will get a listen still.
The Texas case will be heard, and several other State AG’s have announced they are joining. I’m sure they are preparing briefs.
Those who think the case is meritless are dreaming.
It’s not Texas saying their votes are more important than others etc
They are saying an illegal election in one State breaks the equal protection clause of the constitution. It diminishes or disenfranchises Texas voters intent with their vote.
They are also alleging that using Covid as a reason to allow leaner/less strict rules for mail in balloting does the same as above and the way they got to those new rules, by going around the State legislatures is unconstitutional.
It could be a very interesting case. All very interesting when it comes to who and when you can vote. Btw, I think the court does one of two things. They run with their tails between their legs or they really stir it up. Let’s hope they hear it. Make some new case law.
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
|
|
|
|
|
12-09-2020, 04:51 PM
|
#30
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Western NY
Posts: 5,345
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy
first of all the person that is representing the state that is claiming his state was harmed needs convincing evidence that it harmed his state. he is saying that another state's votes are more important than his.
if you allow a case like this, the Supreme Court will be compromised every single time there is an election and the loser wants to stall the process.
cases like this are demoralizing to the members of the Supreme Court. if they keep up with these cases i guarantee that good judges like Amy Barrett will resign from the court along with other justices.
|
A fraudulently elected president harms most everyone. Our country is eroding before our eyes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
@
