Global Warming, Make That Climate Change Yeah

[Tom]

Originally Posted by delayjf

Does that same 97% endorse AOC claim that the world is toast in 12 years?

That 12 years is only if we listen to her!

[Clocker]

Originally Posted by delayjf

Does that same 97% endorse AOC claim that the world is toast in 12 years?

No, but they are employed in positions funded by global warming supporters.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by delayjf

Does that same 97% endorse AOC claim that the world is toast in 12 years?

AC is 10 times brighter than you deniers. However argueing about her is besides the point

Please respond to my questions about the irrelevant link you sent me and the qualifications of the so-called

"400 scientists" who disagree with the anthropomorphic global warming hypothesis"

[hcap]

Originally Posted by Clocker

No, but they are employed in positions funded by global warming supporters.

You may be a tad brighter than the rest of the Chumpy chumpettes here, but are still a fellow ant-science hack.

As I told you, this is not polices except for you scientifically illiterate PA OT loony-tunes.

[davew]

Originally Posted by hcap

AC is 10 times brighter than you deniers. However argueing about her is besides the point

Please respond to my questions about the irrelevant link you sent me and the qualifications of the so-called

"400 scientists" who disagree with the anthropomorphic global warming hypothesis"

what is this hypothesis, shouldn't it be a LAW - since it is proven fact and the cult wants to prosecute those who do not believe.... I guess it will e when the New Green Deal passes.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by davew

what is this hypothesis, shouldn't it be a LAW - since it is proven fact and the cult wants to prosecute those who do not believe.... I guess it will e when the New Green Deal passes.

It took years for women to get the right to vote. For the US to end slavery.

Scientifically for the heliocentric model of the solar system to be accepted.
Most of you ant-lib, ant-science aficionados are why in most cases

Btw, settled is not what you think it is.

[OntheRail]

Originally Posted by hcap

AC is 10 times brighter than you deniers. However argueing about her is besides the point

Please respond to my questions about the irrelevant link you sent me and the qualifications of the so-called

"400 scientists" who disagree with the anthropomorphic global warming hypothesis"

Remove your bias filter and google it.. Let See.


Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called "consensus" on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore

Look Here if you Dare...


Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis.

Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.

More at Forbes...

[davew]

Originally Posted by hcap

It took years for women to get the right to vote. For the US to end slavery.

Scientifically for the heliocentric model of the solar system to be accepted.
Most of you ant-lib, ant-science aficionados are why in most cases

Btw, settled is not what you think it is.

I know what 'settled' means in the case of global warming research

[ReplayRandall]

Originally Posted by davew

I know what 'settled' means in the case of global warming research

I agree that you do know....Since that's settled, Let's end the thread now...

[hcap]

Originally Posted by OntheRail

Remove your bias filter and google it.. Let See.


Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called "consensus" on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore

Look Here if you Dare...


Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis.

Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.

More at Forbes...

Duh! Look if you dare.......

Not Found

The requested URL /forum/https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases-all was not found on this server.

[Tom]

Originally Posted by davew

I know what 'settled' means in the case of global warming research

Does it mean he hasn't got a clue what he posts about and just shouts out at anyone who disagrees with him?

[hcap]

Originally Posted by OntheRail

Remove your bias filter and google it.. Let See.


Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called "consensus" on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore

Look Here if you Dare...


Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis.

Don’t look now, but maybe a scientific consensus exists concerning global warming after all. Only 36 percent of geoscientists and engineers believe that humans are creating a global warming crisis, according to a survey reported in the peer-reviewed Organization Studies. By contrast, a strong majority of the 1,077 respondents believe that nature is the primary cause of recent global warming and/or that future global warming will not be a very serious problem.

More at Forbes...

If we follow Forbes es to the original study we find ....

1)It is only one study from 2012, it only deals with the reposes of
engineers and geoscientists

Where is the peer review of climatologists in this limited study

This paper examines the framings and identity work associated with professionals’ discursive construction of climate change science, their legitimation of themselves as experts on ‘the truth’, and their attitudes towards regulatory measures. Drawing from survey responses of 1077 professional engineers and geoscientists

2)Notes

1As of April 2012, APEGGA (Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists, and Geophysicists of Alberta) changed its name to APEGA (Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta).

1As of April 2012, APEGGA (Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists, and Geophysicists of Alberta) changed its name to APEGA (Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta).


BFR

[hcap]

Read the criticisms if you dare......

Forbes is lying about a study to promote AGW denialism
Feb
https://jadehawks.wordpress.com/2013...agw-denialism/



APEGGA and climate science

APEGGA (now APEGA) is a professional body that regulates the practice of engineering and geoscience (previously geology and geophysics) in the Canadian province of Alberta. Approximately 90% of the professional members are engineers and 10% geoscientists. By provincial law, anybody who works as an engineer or geoscientist in Alberta must be a member of the association, including academics. As might be expected in a province that employs thousands to exploit the largest deposit of bitumen on the planet, there is widespread “skepticism” of anthropogenic climate change among the membership. These views frequently manifest themselves in the organization’s newsletter, sometimes associated with accusations of fraud directed at climate scientists, along with pseudo-science on climate change and, sometimes, young-Earth geochronology. I protested about this in a letter published in the June 2010 edition of the association's news magazine (page eight).


The Continuing Denial of the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
https://www.skepticalscience.com/print.php?n=1551

A March 2008 canvas of 51,000 Canadian scientists with the Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysics of Alberta (APEGGA) found that although 99% of 1,077 replies believe climate is changing, 68% disagreed with the statement that “…the debate on the scientific causes of recent climate change is settled.”

The survey report is here. Note that just a self-selected 2% of the membership responded to the survey, only 15% (about 160) of whom were professional geoscientists. Many of these engineers and geoscientists would likely be oil industry employees with little professional knowledge or expertise in climate science. The survey reported:

There is even less agreement as to the cause: 27.4% believe it is caused by primarily natural factors (natural variation, volcanoes, sunspots, lithosphere motions, etc.), 25.7% believe it is caused by primarily human factors (burning fossil fuels, changing land use, enhanced water evaporation due to irrigation), and 45.2% believe that climate change is caused by both human and natural factors.

[delayjf]

Can you tell me exactly what all these Scientist agree to. Do all of these scientist agree the world is doomed in 12 years?

[Tom]

Come on, Jeff. Be fair.
You want actual facts?