Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 08-23-2018, 02:02 PM   #751
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost View Post
For all that verbiage, what you are saying is you don't believe them. Fine. We will find out. If, as you say, they didn't have to produce the evidence in court, then why even bring it up?


I believe the penalty would be perjury. knowingly making a false statement in court. And yes, attorneys-Defense or Prosecution-are subject to prosecution for perjury just like anyone else. I looked it up.
Oh, I have no problem believing Trump directed Cohen to pay the ladies.

What I don't believe, is that the way these transactions were made constitutes a crime, just because a prosecutor says it's a crime and has Cohen plead guilty to something altogether different.

Ultimately, judges and juries tell us when crimes have been committed. Not prosecutors.
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-23-2018, 02:03 PM   #752
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost View Post
evidence of a crime that never existed.
Oh boy...now you're getting somewhere...concentrate on that line for a while...
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-23-2018, 02:08 PM   #753
mostpost
Registered User
 
mostpost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by OntheRail View Post
Just because some hack said something and another quotes him... then first said it's been confirmed and second says we've now confirmed. Don't make it truthful, correct or so.
What you said above, perfectly describes what entities such as Breitbart, Hot Air, Red State etc, do. They use each other as sources without independent confirmation.


If the New York Times reports something, CNN or MSNBC may say "The New York Times is reporting that..." They will not say "We can confirm..." unless they have independently talked to the sources or examined the documents.


That is the rule in the real media. Fox News is not a part of the real media.
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
mostpost is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-23-2018, 02:13 PM   #754
mostpost
Registered User
 
mostpost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
Oh boy...now you're getting somewhere...concentrate on that line for a while...
The full quote: Are you talking about Pizzagate type evidence, also known as evidence of a crime that never existed.



What you referenced; Evidence of a crime that never existed.

Pizza Gate is a crime that never existed.

Russian collusion or conspiracy is a very real crime.


You didn't really think I would let you get away with that, did you?
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
mostpost is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-23-2018, 02:15 PM   #755
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
Evidence of a crime that never existed. Trump's payoff and FEC violations.

Cohen and the prosecutors provide evidence of a crime that never existed.

You're getting it! You're getting it!

Soon mostpost will be WOKE AF!
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-23-2018, 02:23 PM   #756
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
Evidence of a crime that never existed. Trump's payoff and FEC violations.

Cohen and the prosecutors provide evidence of a crime that never existed.

You're getting it! You're getting it!

Soon mostpost will be WOKE AF!
These laws are not that confusing. You are 1000% correct Trump may not have committed a crime. I don't doubt this.

Right now though you have on one side President Trump who has lied literally non-stop about this issue. That's not even remotely up for debate. Have you noticed that nobody is defending him right now? Not even his Press Secretary?

On the other side you have Cohen who pled guilty to the crime, the NY AG's office evidence of a crime, and now Pecker's immunity in exchange for testimony...

Again... he could be innocent. I don't doubt that. What we know though... it doesn't look good.

If he was any other elected official he would currently be indicted. President's can't be... sorta... kinda... whatever... the AG's and Special Investigator don't think he can and I'm inclined to agree its a bad precedent.

These are Trump Appointees here...

I said this is gonna get waaay worse and it will. There is a way out for him but you all think I'm crazy suggesting he take it. At best he's just a crooked as Hillary and a lot dumber... that's why he is in he situation he is in.

Last edited by elysiantraveller; 08-23-2018 at 02:25 PM.
elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-23-2018, 02:29 PM   #757
OntheRail
Registered User
 
OntheRail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost View Post
What you said above, perfectly describes what entities such as Breitbart, Hot Air, Red State etc, do. They use each other as sources without independent confirmation.


If the New York Times reports something, CNN or MSNBC may say "The New York Times is reporting that..." They will not say "We can confirm..." unless they have independently talked to the sources or examined the documents.


That is the rule in the real media. Fox News is not a part of the real media.
The Rule...
We see the Merry-go-round of CNN said that on MSNBC to the Times... Post... back to CNN rag and repeat. You know it. The News is no longer about the truth... it's a cult of personalities and click bait. Just be the first to through it against the wall and see what sticks.
__________________
Remember To Help Old Friends Thoroughbred Retirement Center.
OntheRail is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-23-2018, 02:33 PM   #758
OntheRail
Registered User
 
OntheRail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post
The first two are lies.

The rest are pretty interpretive.
And you prove my point and Rudy's.. Thank You.
__________________
Remember To Help Old Friends Thoroughbred Retirement Center.
OntheRail is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-23-2018, 02:37 PM   #759
ReplayRandall
Buckle Up
 
ReplayRandall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post
I said this is gonna get waaay worse and it will. There is a way out for him but you all think I'm crazy suggesting he take it. At best he's just a crooked as Hillary and a lot dumber... that's why he is in he situation he is in.
This clip says it all.....Enjoy the show!


ReplayRandall is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-23-2018, 02:46 PM   #760
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by OntheRail View Post
And you prove my point and Rudy's.. Thank You.
The first one has resulted in dozens of indictments and a bunch of convictions so....

Rudy actually admitted the second one... then said it wasn't a crime.
elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-23-2018, 03:09 PM   #761
OntheRail
Registered User
 
OntheRail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post
The first one has resulted in dozens of indictments and a bunch of convictions so....

Rudy actually admitted the second one... then said it wasn't a crime.
#1... Not one connected to so called Russsan Election Collusion... which was the supposed reason for the Investigation.

#2 See #1.

But We All know the true REASON for #1... Unseat a dueling Elected President that should never of WON in the eyes of " The ESTABLISHMENT ".

But your good with that.
__________________
Remember To Help Old Friends Thoroughbred Retirement Center.
OntheRail is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-23-2018, 03:13 PM   #762
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by OntheRail View Post
#1... Not one connected to so called Russsan Election Collusion... which was the supposed reason for the Investigation.

#2 See #1.

But We All know the true REASON for #1... Unseat a dueling Elected President that should never of WON in the eyes of " The ESTABLISHMENT ".

But your good with that.
Not yet... maybe not at all... that's why people investigate.
elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-23-2018, 03:22 PM   #763
tucker6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post
Again... he could be innocent. I don't doubt that. What we know though... it doesn't look good.
Adultery rarely looks good, but it isn't a crime. That's all this is to me.
tucker6 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-23-2018, 03:23 PM   #764
tucker6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post
Not yet... maybe not at all... that's why people investigate.
How does an investigation need to persist without ANY evidence of a crime before it should end?
tucker6 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-23-2018, 03:25 PM   #765
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post
Not yet... maybe not at all... that's why people investigate.
Question. After all this is said and done, would you agree, that as a matter of regular function, a special investigator be appointed along with every new Presidential election?

Let's add a wing to DOJ for this.

Every new President must go through this from now on.

And it must be an EXHAUSTIVE investigation. Especially if the President is a Republican.

What do you say?
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.