Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 17 votes, 5.00 average.
Old 11-09-2014, 09:54 AM   #631
fast4522
Registered User
 
fast4522's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,476
Check this one out. . . . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAWbRWlSlpk
fast4522 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2014, 09:56 AM   #632
DJofSD
Screw PC
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,728
Yes, John Coleman has been mentioned in this thread already.
__________________
Truth sounds like hate to those who hate truth.
DJofSD is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2014, 09:58 AM   #633
fast4522
Registered User
 
fast4522's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,476
More substance. . . . . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEaFzhoS67I
fast4522 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2014, 10:33 AM   #634
jballscalls
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by fast4522
how come you only show the scientists who think it's a hoax and not the ones who think it's real?
__________________
Check out my daily horse racing podcast The BARN at www.betamerica.com/barn
jballscalls is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2014, 10:40 AM   #635
DJofSD
Screw PC
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by jballscalls
how come you only show the scientists who think it's a hoax and not the ones who think it's real?
Put that shoe on the other foot.
__________________
Truth sounds like hate to those who hate truth.
DJofSD is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2014, 10:58 AM   #636
jballscalls
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJofSD
Put that shoe on the other foot.
I'm not getting what you mean?
__________________
Check out my daily horse racing podcast The BARN at www.betamerica.com/barn
jballscalls is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2014, 11:02 AM   #637
DJofSD
Screw PC
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,728
Why should I, as a member of the the so called deniers, post information from the true believers when those who believe in AGW do not cite claims by those whom do not believe in it?
__________________
Truth sounds like hate to those who hate truth.
DJofSD is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2014, 11:16 AM   #638
jballscalls
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJofSD
Why should I, as a member of the the so called deniers, post information from the true believers when those who believe in AGW do not cite claims by those whom do not believe in it?
because science is about gathering all the information possible. I'm just curious why people take a position on something without reading all the information they can. It seems the deniers all happen to be from one party and the believers from another party. People dig in and look for whatever information fits their agenda, as opposed to what is actually factual. If you're a denier that's fine and dandy, just curious why you wouldn't also be interested in posting information from believers as well to help the debate
__________________
Check out my daily horse racing podcast The BARN at www.betamerica.com/barn
jballscalls is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2014, 11:34 AM   #639
DJofSD
Screw PC
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,728
I have no agenda. What I do have is experience "doing science." And at the heart of it is being able to say 'prove it.' And then being able to examine, question and attempt to reproduce the results.

Too much of what is accepted today as debate and examination is influenced by politics and money. It cuts off the needed discussion in order to discover the facts. Asserting here's the results and there's no need to delve into the specifics because the science is settled is anything but scientific.
__________________
Truth sounds like hate to those who hate truth.
DJofSD is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2014, 12:38 PM   #640
tucker6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,170
Quote:
Originally Posted by jballscalls
because science is about gathering all the information possible.
Most of what goes for facts and information in climate science is done via models. Models are made to fit the idea of the modelers. Therefore, the models will always tend to support the hypothesis. What we are finding over time is that even the most 'pessimistic' global warming models (i.e, show low amounts of warming) tend to overestimate the warming by leaps and bounds. You are more than welcome to post anti-AGW literature. There's plenty of it, both peer reviewed and non-peer reviewed, although as we all know by now, peer review in climate science is done by friends over a beer or two.
tucker6 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2014, 12:41 PM   #641
hcap
Registered User
 
hcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
B.S.
__________________
The inmates have taken over the asylum.
hcap is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2014, 01:56 PM   #642
tucker6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,170
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
B.S.
Yes, I have a bachelor of science. Why do you ask?
tucker6 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2014, 02:12 PM   #643
fast4522
Registered User
 
fast4522's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by jballscalls
how come you only show the scientists who think it's a hoax and not the ones who think it's real?
Do you recall here at PA when Obo won his second term, time to put your seat belts on? Besides no one gives a rats ass about your bogus claims of global warming anyway, when the money becomes very scarce we will use the ax to reduce the need.

Last edited by fast4522; 11-09-2014 at 02:16 PM.
fast4522 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2014, 02:20 PM   #644
DJofSD
Screw PC
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,728
2012: BOHICA.
__________________
Truth sounds like hate to those who hate truth.
DJofSD is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2014, 02:28 PM   #645
jballscalls
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJofSD
. Asserting here's the results and there's no need to delve into the specifics because the science is settled is anything but scientific.
I agree
__________________
Check out my daily horse racing podcast The BARN at www.betamerica.com/barn
jballscalls is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.