Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 03-11-2019, 07:52 PM   #166
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
SA needs to remove the cushion and completely rebuild the base. Throw the surface back on and go about their business. If there are more breakdowns that they experience in a normal year then the real digging needs to start. My money is on the track base being jacked from all the rain.
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-11-2019, 10:01 PM   #167
taxicab
Registered User
 
taxicab's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,601
Here is where Stronach/TOC/Horsemen/CHRB are making a fatal error.
If the state of California wants to close Santa Anita they will.
The people who can close Santa Anita have nothing to do with horse racing.
They're just going to play the animal cruelty card......and that will be that.
I'm shocked Stronach and company can't read the room on this one.
In this PC world we live in,people who are reactionary have the clout........and nowhere.......and I mean nowhere,is that more obvious than California.
Animal rights groups,agenda driven politicians,the mainstream PC public will have the power/final say on this one...........and it'll appear on a ballot quicker than you can say Jack Robinson...........and it's lights out.
Once again........California is driven by the PC Patrol and the thought police......agenda driven politicians get in bed with them all the time.
The fact that Santa Anita is ignoring the obvious is beyond belief.
Tone deaf x's infinity.
As mentioned earlier in this thread........the minute more horses go wrong.....it's going to get ugly for Santa Anita.
Remember,we're all horse racing fans on this board..........the mainstream public/politicians/PC Patrol/animal welfare groups aren't.
Which side has the bigger numbers and more power ?
Yup.
Santa Anita never should of reopened this meet........it's a risk they shouldn't take.
And the Breeders Cup this year ?
Dilanesp is on the right page.
The Breeders Cup folks probably already have a backup site in place.
They want nothing to do with a track that the mainstream public perceives as a horse graveyard........if Santa Anita gets shutdown again for just one weekend........it's adios Breeders Cup 2019 @ The Great Race Place.
You can bet your bottom dollar they've been talking with the one property that can host a BC weekend on short notice........Churchill Downs.

Last edited by taxicab; 03-11-2019 at 10:02 PM.
taxicab is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-12-2019, 12:56 AM   #168
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
BTW it is raining tonight.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-12-2019, 10:55 AM   #169
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by castaway01 View Post
Did you invest in the horse and buggy in 1912 too?
I have a theory about parimutel gambling.

You have to go where the smartest people ain't .
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-12-2019, 12:55 PM   #170
ultracapper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by cutchemist42 View Post
Thats the thing, its easy an easy target that no politcian will stick their neck out to save as its not really that important. TSG likely knows how valuable the property is for development anyway.

I mean, Caroline Betts who is the economist that has handled horse racing topics before was just tweeting recreational horse activites is worth more for GDP than horse racing.
Yea, likely.
ultracapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-12-2019, 02:09 PM   #171
bello
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper View Post
I have a theory about parimutel gambling.

You have to go where the smartest people ain't .
Same goes for racetrack management and executives
bello is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-12-2019, 02:56 PM   #172
castaway01
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper View Post
I have a theory about parimutel gambling.

You have to go where the smartest people ain't .
But wouldn't the few people left still playing the dogs be the true fanatics and obsessives, the "smartest" people in the field?
castaway01 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-12-2019, 05:31 PM   #173
chiguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by taxicab View Post
Here is where Stronach/TOC/Horsemen/CHRB are making a fatal error.
If the state of California wants to close Santa Anita they will.
The people who can close Santa Anita have nothing to do with horse racing.
They're just going to play the animal cruelty card......and that will be that.
I'm shocked Stronach and company can't read the room on this one.
In this PC world we live in,people who are reactionary have the clout........and nowhere.......and I mean nowhere,is that more obvious than California.
Animal rights groups,agenda driven politicians,the mainstream PC public will have the power/final say on this one...........and it'll appear on a ballot quicker than you can say Jack Robinson...........and it's lights out.
Once again........California is driven by the PC Patrol and the thought police......agenda driven politicians get in bed with them all the time.
The fact that Santa Anita is ignoring the obvious is beyond belief.
Tone deaf x's infinity.
As mentioned earlier in this thread........the minute more horses go wrong.....it's going to get ugly for Santa Anita.
Remember,we're all horse racing fans on this board..........the mainstream public/politicians/PC Patrol/animal welfare groups aren't.
Which side has the bigger numbers and more power ?
Yup.
Santa Anita never should of reopened this meet........it's a risk they shouldn't take.
And the Breeders Cup this year ?
Dilanesp is on the right page.
The Breeders Cup folks probably already have a backup site in place.
They want nothing to do with a track that the mainstream public perceives as a horse graveyard........if Santa Anita gets shutdown again for just one weekend........it's adios Breeders Cup 2019 @ The Great Race Place.
You can bet your bottom dollar they've been talking with the one property that can host a BC weekend on short notice........Churchill Downs.

I really don't understand how we as a community of racing enthusiasts can complain about PETA or the PC patrol when our methods and practices are leading to the deaths of so many horses in such a short period of time. As I have said on this thread (or a similar thread) this one is on us. Yes these things happen, horses die while racing and training but not at this level without some serious negligence.
chiguy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-12-2019, 08:39 PM   #174
taxicab
Registered User
 
taxicab's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiguy View Post
I really don't understand how we as a community of racing enthusiasts can complain about PETA or the PC patrol when our methods and practices are leading to the deaths of so many horses in such a short period of time. As I have said on this thread (or a similar thread) this one is on us. Yes these things happen, horses die while racing and training but not at this level without some serious negligence.
I should clarify my post Chiguy.
I'm not complaining about the outrage over the horse fatalities.
I'm very aware something is rotten in Denmark concerning Santa Anita.
As a matter of fact,I'm convinced Santa Anita(Stronach/Ritvo.....the mouthpiece)are so full of shit their eyes are brown.
I think they don't give a crap about the horses.........and the only reason they're in front of the issue now is severe damage control.
I caught Ritvo's Q/A over at Paulick's..........not for a second do I buy what he's selling......his kind of snake oil doesn't fly with anybody that's been around.
My two posts in this thread are simply stating how shocked I am that Santa Anita/TOC/Horsemen/CHRB appear to be clueless to how close they are to a business disaster.
They act like nothing down the road is going to happen to them..........I think they're really wrong.

Last edited by taxicab; 03-12-2019 at 08:40 PM.
taxicab is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-13-2019, 10:28 AM   #175
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,589
Horse racing in no way compares to dog racing.

Anyone who thinks horse racing is in danger of disappearing isn't thinking clearly.

There's a reason hundreds of thousands show up for the Triple Crown races every year...there is a reason they are on national TV...it's just not the same thing.

I will go further and also point out that lots of "regular" folks were more sensitive to the dog racing situation because a lot of those people have dogs as pets. Not exactly the same thing with horses. With dogs, there was much more of an emotional connection there, I'm thinking, with those who voted to eliminate dog racing in Florida.
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-13-2019, 12:24 PM   #176
ronsmac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
Horse racing in no way compares to dog racing.

Anyone who thinks horse racing is in danger of disappearing isn't thinking clearly.

There's a reason hundreds of thousands show up for the Triple Crown races every year...there is a reason they are on national TV...it's just not the same thing.

I will go further and also point out that lots of "regular" folks were more sensitive to the dog racing situation because a lot of those people have dogs as pets. Not exactly the same thing with horses. With dogs, there was much more of an emotional connection there, I'm thinking, with those who voted to eliminate dog racing in Florida.
Horse racing as a whole may not disappear but if not for slots/casino's, there would be a lot of tracks that would be closed that are currently open. So it's already a teetering industry and I wouldn't be shocked if it's gone before I die.
ronsmac is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-13-2019, 01:29 PM   #177
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by castaway01 View Post
But wouldn't the few people left still playing the dogs be the true fanatics and obsessives, the "smartest" people in the field?
That's a good question.

I don't know yet.

I occasionally bet into some really small pools for smallish amounts. I find I'd rather be a big fish in a small pond than a small fish in a big pond even though I risk moving the pool a little and can't bet a lot.

I have no idea what the dogs are like these days.

I have a funny story about that though. I used to go to the dog track in Naples/Ft Myers on some of my vacations. My girlfriend's uncle used to come to the track with me. He'd bet $100 per race and almost always move the win odds very late. I tried to explain it to him, but he didn't care. So I always asked him who he was going to bet and bet one of the other contenders. I'm sure that strategy didn't hurt.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-13-2019, 02:14 PM   #178
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
Horse racing in no way compares to dog racing.

Anyone who thinks horse racing is in danger of disappearing isn't thinking clearly.

There's a reason hundreds of thousands show up for the Triple Crown races every year...there is a reason they are on national TV...it's just not the same thing.

I will go further and also point out that lots of "regular" folks were more sensitive to the dog racing situation because a lot of those people have dogs as pets. Not exactly the same thing with horses. With dogs, there was much more of an emotional connection there, I'm thinking, with those who voted to eliminate dog racing in Florida.
They probably won't ban it in Kentucky but we might ban it in California.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-13-2019, 05:25 PM   #179
airford1
Registered User
 
airford1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 510
It could happen in California and the rest of the Country there only a handful of tracks with purses that will pay some bill and that will close some too.
airford1 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-13-2019, 06:21 PM   #180
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by airford1 View Post
It could happen in California and the rest of the Country there only a handful of tracks with purses that will pay some bill and that will close some too.

I don't know New York politics as well as California's, but I could certainly see it getting a foothold there too.


Here's a ranking of states with major racing operations based on their likelihood of enacting a ban:


1. California
2. Washington
3. Massachusetts
4. Illinois

5. New Jersey

6. New York
7. Pennsylvania
8. Maryland
9. Florida

610983492735794. Kentucky
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.