Weinstein accused of harassment

[PaceAdvantage]

I have zero issue with anybody speaking their mind about any subject. Hell, I keep letting you post here...that should be evidence enough.

[Dahoss9698]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

I have zero issue with anybody speaking their mind about any subject. Hell, I keep letting you post here...that should be evidence enough.

You're not being honest. Then why did you say I was a dick for defending her?

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by Dahoss9698

You're not being honest. Then why did you say I was a dick for defending her?

Because her actions shouldn't be defended.

She wasn't holding back Weinstein's name because of any sort of victimization.

She was holding his name back for the same reason all those in Hollywood who knew of this "open secret" (and were NOT victim's of Weinstein), were holding his name back.

The chances she was holding his name back because of what happened to her are slim to none. But they exist, I grant you that.

If you weren't a dick, you'd agree that the fact that she publicly shared her story of abuse makes it odd that she would be holding back his name simply because of the abuse she suffered. She most likely wouldn't have shared her story at all if that's how she felt.

[Dahoss9698]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Because her actions shouldn't be defended.

She wasn't holding back Weinstein's name because of any sort of victimization.

She was holding his name back for the same reason all those in Hollywood who knew of this "open secret" (and were NOT victim's of Weinstein), were holding his name back.

More dishonesty. I'm learning a lot about you today.

The truth is we have no idea why she did what she did.

Were you this involved in the Roger Ailes discussions?

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by Dahoss9698

Were you this involved in the Roger Ailes discussions?

Were you?

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by Dahoss9698

The truth is we have no idea why she did what she did.

I take back what I said earlier. I have a pretty good idea why she did what she did.

[jms62]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

It's interesting she may have thought Weinstein could end her career, but the President of the United States has zero ability to mess with her life.

Good stuff boys.

Doesn't add up using conventional math...that's the problem. Unless you're clouded by politics that is, which I'm not.

She's a strong woman. No snowflake there. What you say, I'm not buying.

Yeah the president of the United States is going to go after a private citizen cause there is no chance that will ever be made public and ruin him.

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by jms62

Yeah the president of the United States is going to go after a private citizen cause there is no chance that will ever be made public and ruin him.

I thought he was a vindictive little child?

I wouldn't want to piss off a vindictive little child that has the IRS among other agencies at his fingertips...would you?

Trump wouldn't be the first president to do such a thing.

[BaffertsWig]

Forget Dotard for a minute, let's look at the other seven women who didn't publicly "insult" Drumpf, and try think about why they never came forward. You should be so lucky you don't have that experience in common with them, PA.

[Dahoss9698]

Originally Posted by BaffertsWig

Forget Dotard for a minute, let's look at the other seven women who didn't publicly "insult" Drumpf, and try think about why they never came forward. You should be so lucky you don't have that experience in common with them, PA.

Great point!

But it has nothing to do with politics.

Like I said before, come to PA for the horse talk and stay for the off topic laughs.

[PaceAdvantage]

The dynamic duo are in rare form. Monkey back slaps all around fellas.

But you're still losing/lost the debate.

The seven others have zero to do with the current discussion. Unless you're trying to tell me all victims of abuse act and feel alike, and I know you're not telling me that.

[Dahoss9698]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

The dynamic duo are in rare form. Monkey back slaps all around fellas.

But you're still losing/lost the debate.

The seven others have zero to do with the current discussion. Unless you're trying to tell me all victims of abuse act and feel alike, and I know you're not telling me that.

It's amazing what owning a message board does to ones ego.

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by Dahoss9698

It's amazing what owning a message board does to ones ego.

These are the words of someone losing a debate, you realize that, yes?

[Fager Fan]

There weren't seven others. There were many more than that. What has been reported is that eight others, not including Judd, took monetary payouts in exchange for non-disclosure about what he did.

I haven't read the story yet, but a newsbreak came through my phone that said Angelina Jolie and Gwyneth Paltrow are two others who were victimized by Weinstein .

[PaceAdvantage]

And now it's being reported that he is being accused of raping at least two women...story in the New Yorker.

I'm done with this piece of trash...protected by Hollywood for years.

I'm sure Hillary was well aware of all the whispers around Hollywood, but gladly took this scumbag's money...as did all the other liberal organizations he donated to in order to keep up appearances.