|
|
07-07-2020, 04:50 PM
|
#136
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,604
|
Baffert's lawyer responded to the NY Times article and suggested the amount was very low and did not impact performance. Of course, that's his lawyer saying that.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
|
|
|
07-07-2020, 04:53 PM
|
#137
|
C'est Tout
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cajunland
Posts: 13,269
|
Baffert is a cheating piece of shit, period.
Remember when you were all WOWED by Gamine's performance in the Acorn?
Seriously, as racing veterans, how can y'all fall for that again?
Her career will MAYBE last two more races
__________________
How do I work this?
-David Byrne
|
|
|
07-07-2020, 05:32 PM
|
#138
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Flint Hills
Posts: 474
|
If I understand it correctly the second test results said the incidence was of such minuscule amount (the fractional particulate was measured in trillionths) there is no way it could have affected performance of the horse. They also have a solid story put together regarding the pre-race handler of both horses in question wearing a patch on his back due to HIS condition...
I think Baffert walks away from this one. Again.
__________________
"Better to do little well than more poorly." Appy
|
|
|
07-07-2020, 05:43 PM
|
#139
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 5,870
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhantomOnTour
Baffert is a cheating piece of shit, period.
Remember when you were all WOWED by Gamine's performance in the Acorn?
Seriously, as racing veterans, how can y'all fall for that again?
Her career will MAYBE last two more races
|
you could have a point, if baffert was the only doing something. Which he is not.
You try keeping up with the servis's and navarro's of the world with hay, oats and water.
|
|
|
07-07-2020, 06:00 PM
|
#140
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 15,118
|
Amazingly, since they changed the rules in CA. Both, Baffert and Sadler have blamed the bad test on a employee.
The sport keeps finding new ways to look the other way.
|
|
|
07-07-2020, 06:04 PM
|
#141
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,827
|
Anybody ever put a Salonpas Lidocaine 4% Pain Relieving Maximum Strength Gel-Patch on and end up with residue that would stick around for 2 and 1/2 hours on your hands? Are they that difficult to put on, Shack seems to be able to do it, my BS detector is going off?
__________________
Every time you are tempted to react in the same old way, ask if you want to be a prisoner of the past or a pioneer of the future.
|
|
|
07-07-2020, 06:54 PM
|
#142
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay68802
Amazingly, since they changed the rules in CA. Both, Baffert and Sadler have blamed the bad test on a employee.
The sport keeps finding new ways to look the other way.
|
Right. And people defend this stuff. Meanwhile track and field suspends people two years for cold medication. For some reason, way too many people in this sport want to cut trainers slack rather than just strictly enforcing the rules.
|
|
|
07-07-2020, 07:14 PM
|
#143
|
clean money
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,558
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIG49010
Anybody ever put a Salonpas Lidocaine 4% Pain Relieving Maximum Strength Gel-Patch on and end up with residue that would stick around for 2 and 1/2 hours on your hands? Are they that difficult to put on, Shack seems to be able to do it, my BS detector is going off?
|
You think Shaq wouldn't take an edge, if there existed a substance that was icy to dull the pain, and hot to relax it away?
__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.
|
|
|
07-07-2020, 09:26 PM
|
#144
|
self medicated
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: toga
Posts: 3,086
|
Who knows the truth but a few people? All I can say is at least everyone knows about it. That hiding crap is more troubling. Do certain people get a “ pass” . I don’t but doing that is asking for trouble
|
|
|
07-07-2020, 09:37 PM
|
#145
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 15,118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Fischer
You think Shaq wouldn't take an edge, if there existed a substance that was icy to dull the pain, and hot to relax it away?
|
|
|
|
07-07-2020, 11:39 PM
|
#146
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: JCapper Platinum: Kind of like Deep Blue... but for horses.
Posts: 5,287
|
According to the BloodHorse article by Frank Angst:
Quote:
While both horses tested well above the threshold—Gamine was more than nine-times over the limit and Charlatan more than twice the limit—Robertson said the levels are still very small and he'll argue that neither horse was affected by the lidocaine in their system.
|
Imo, thresholds are there for a reason.
I don't care who the trainer is. When a trainer has a horse test at 9X the threshold and and another test at 2X the threshold:
The best decision the sport can make is simply enforce the rules.
-jp
.
__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com
|
|
|
07-08-2020, 01:16 AM
|
#147
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 15,118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff P
According to the BloodHorse article by Frank Angst:
Imo, thresholds are there for a reason.
I don't care who the trainer is. When a trainer has a horse test at 9X the threshold and and another test at 2X the threshold:
The best decision the sport can make is simply enforce the rules.
-jp
.
|
To be nice on this subject, no punishment = no change.
|
|
|
07-08-2020, 06:58 AM
|
#148
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 430
|
So the accidental overage (9x in Gamine) was caused by an OTC, topical human product that somehow "accidentally" got onto two different animals each weighing roughly 7-8 times that of the average human that the product was designed to treat. Since the product is topical this trace amount just happened to be rubbed off onto two different horses and managed to be absorbed through the dermal layer, plus likely a haircoat (depending on where it accidentally wound up on the horse's body) to such an extent that it caused an overage in one horse 9 times above the allowed amount.
Yeah, I have a large bridge on the market as well...
|
|
|
07-08-2020, 08:40 AM
|
#149
|
self medicated
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: toga
Posts: 3,086
|
The “ gypsum weed” theory. Even if the overage is multiple the threshold...... somehow it expands like yeast in horses...
Hey, you are many times over...... answer: it was trace amounts of contamination......lol.... nothing to see here
Last edited by burnsy; 07-08-2020 at 08:45 AM.
|
|
|
07-08-2020, 09:55 AM
|
#150
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,604
|
Honestly, I think the chances this was intentional are pretty close to zero.
If you are Bob Baffert and you are trying to cheat, you don't use something you know they will test for and it's almost certainly not a variation of Icy Hot. The story his lawyer is telling may be true or maybe it's used by Baffert in training and they got the withdrawal timing wrong etc... Who knows?
But that's a completely different issue than whether the horses should be disqualified and some sort of penalty should be imposed on the trainer according to the rules.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|