Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 4.20 average.
Old 07-10-2017, 06:07 PM   #376
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
I know people probably get tired of hearing about Gulfstream, but here goes anyway.

cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2017, 02:00 PM   #377
zawaaa
vaguely on topic...
 
zawaaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 104
i hate to be too didactic, but, you appear to be timing from when the gates start to open instead of when the horses actually break from the gate (this is roughly half a second, maybe a bit less). is that accurate?

i'm not sure what the standard for non run-up timing is, tbf.
zawaaa is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2017, 02:05 PM   #378
johnhannibalsmith
Registered User
 
johnhannibalsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by zawaaa View Post
...

i'm not sure what the standard for non run-up timing is, tbf.
In quarter-horse racing (no runup) the timer begins when the starter plunges the button to open the gate.
__________________
"You make me feel like I am fun again."

-Robert James Smith, 1989
johnhannibalsmith is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2017, 02:10 PM   #379
AltonKelsey
Veteran
 
AltonKelsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by zawaaa View Post
i hate to be too didactic, but, you appear to be timing from when the gates start to open instead of when the horses actually break from the gate (this is roughly half a second, maybe a bit less). is that accurate?

i'm not sure what the standard for non run-up timing is, tbf.
Doesn't really matter , as long as you're consistent. A lot easier to use the gate than the horses

The only time this would even start to matter is if all the horses broke very slowly.

Last edited by AltonKelsey; 07-12-2017 at 02:11 PM.
AltonKelsey is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2017, 03:33 PM   #380
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by zawaaa View Post
i hate to be too didactic, but, you appear to be timing from when the gates start to open instead of when the horses actually break from the gate (this is roughly half a second, maybe a bit less). is that accurate?

i'm not sure what the standard for non run-up timing is, tbf.
Two things...

One, I don't know what didactic means.

Two, I am timing from the gate, but I'm doing a lot more than that. I freeze the video when the winner hits the finish line and annotate the time on the video. I think back up by the official time. This shows me where the "official" timing began, the portion after run up. Anything from the point back to the gate is the time of the run up.

I should mention that there is no possible way to determine the actual starting point of timing visually when the rails are out at Gulfstream (or any other course, for that matter).
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2017, 03:40 PM   #381
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by AltonKelsey View Post
Doesn't really matter , as long as you're consistent. A lot easier to use the gate than the horses

The only time this would even start to matter is if all the horses broke very slowly.
I would argue it matters a lot when the run up is 500 to 600 feet. A race that is almost 1 1/16 miles is being listed as 7.5f. Nearly 12% of the race is being timed. Not only that, it is the 12% that probably has the biggest effect on final time.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-13-2017, 09:51 AM   #382
Prof.Factor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 109
7-11-2017 LAD race 7 ... a wee bit off?
Prof.Factor is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-13-2017, 10:11 AM   #383
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prof.Factor View Post
7-11-2017 LAD race 7 ... a wee bit off?
Something definitely amiss there. I haven't investigated that one yet but my projected variant based on the times was 1 point slow for the two other routes, 30 points fast for that one.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-13-2017, 06:33 PM   #384
AltonKelsey
Veteran
 
AltonKelsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
I would argue it matters a lot when the run up is 500 to 600 feet. A race that is almost 1 1/16 miles is being listed as 7.5f. Nearly 12% of the race is being timed. Not only that, it is the 12% that probably has the biggest effect on final time.

Not sure how you conflated my response as claiming run up didn't matter. Was clearly referring to whether you use the gate opening vs the horse leaving the gate.
AltonKelsey is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-13-2017, 09:48 PM   #385
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by AltonKelsey View Post
Not sure how you conflated my response as claiming run up didn't matter. Was clearly referring to whether you use the gate opening vs the horse leaving the gate.
You're right, my mistake...though I don't know what conflated means. I generally have a very good vocabulary but with this happening twice in one thread I may be slipping.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-14-2017, 12:01 PM   #386
AltonKelsey
Veteran
 
AltonKelsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1,831
I rarely use it myself, but it's legit.


https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conflate
AltonKelsey is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-14-2017, 12:45 PM   #387
HoofedInTheChest
Registered User
 
HoofedInTheChest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Woodbine
Posts: 2,657
We've got a guy, who is rather pedantic.
HoofedInTheChest is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-16-2017, 11:25 PM   #388
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
I know people probably get tired of hearing about Gulfstream, but here goes anyway.
There are no run ups being reported any longer for these races. They just show up as 0, which is a bit misleading since some tracks do actually use zero (like Mahoning Valley), but in this case there is definitely still a LOT of run up. Today, for example, there was nearly nine seconds of run up in a race timed in just over 90 seconds.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-17-2017, 03:54 PM   #389
zawaaa
vaguely on topic...
 
zawaaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
There are no run ups being reported any longer for these races. They just show up as 0, which is a bit misleading since some tracks do actually use zero (like Mahoning Valley), but in this case there is definitely still a LOT of run up. Today, for example, there was nearly nine seconds of run up in a race timed in just over 90 seconds.
equibase has gone back and retroactively removed the 7.5 furlong turf run-ups back to june 9th for races run off the rail, as well. somebody please tell these guys this is definitely NOT acceptable!

anyways here are some of the missing run-ups from the gulfstream park website, if you care
Quote:
TURF RUN-UPS
Friday, July 14
Race 2 5f ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 59, Back Gap 2, Run-Up 178ft
Race 4 7-1/2f ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 45, Front Gap 1, Run-Up 115ft
Race 6 1m ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 121, Front Gap 2, Run-Up 136ft
Race 8 5f ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 59, Back Gap 2, Run-Up 178ft

Saturday, July 15
Race 1 5f ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 59, Back Gap 3, Run-Up 5ft
Race 4 1-1/16m ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 107, Front Gap 8, Run-Up 155ft
Race 6 1m ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 121, Front Gap 3, Run-Up 211ft
Race 8 5f ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 59, Back Gap 3, Run-Up 5ft
Race 10 1m ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 121, Front Gap 2, Run-Up 136ft
Race 12 7-1/2f ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 45, Front Gap 1, Run-Up 115ft

Sunday, July 16
Race 1 5f ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 59, Back Gap 2, Run-Up 178ft
Race 4 5f ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 59, Back Gap 2, Run-Up 178ft
Race 6 1-1/16m ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 107, Front Gap 8, Run-Up 155ft
Race 8 1-1/16m ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 107, Front Gap 9, Run-Up 221ft
Race 10 1-1/16m ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 107, Front Gap 8, Run-Up 155ft
Race 12 7-1/2f ( 84ft Rail ) Timer 45, Front Gap 1, Run-Up 115ft
zawaaa is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-17-2017, 04:11 PM   #390
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by zawaaa View Post
equibase has gone back and retroactively removed the 7.5 furlong turf run-ups back to june 9th for races run off the rail, as well. somebody please tell these guys this is definitely NOT acceptable!

anyways here are some of the missing run-ups from the gulfstream park website, if you care
I think Equibase is taking the stance that not reporting the run up is better than reporting a fictional run up. I agree with them personally. It is a farce that Gulfstream labels these races 7.5 furlongs. It is a slap in the face to horseplayers.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.