|
|
02-23-2019, 07:17 PM
|
#76
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
At Breitbart, the five best arguments against climate alarmism.
Argument #5: The proposed solutions to “climate change” are “unworkable, dangerous and useless.”
https://www.breitbart.com/europe/201...ate-alarmism/#
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
02-23-2019, 07:52 PM
|
#77
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,887
|
We are never going to stop it.
We better learn to adapt.
Move inland.
Go from there.
I'm looking forward to the 10 pound tomatoes.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
02-24-2019, 12:02 AM
|
#78
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,376
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
The author Michael Bastasch
Credentials
B.A., Political Science, University of Portland (2011).
Someone without any credentials except as a "is a reporter for the conservative news site The Daily Caller where he focuses on energy and environmental issues. Bastasch has published over 3,000 articles on The Daily Caller and has regularly provided a platform for climate change skeptics."
And a Koch Brother flunky
Yeah sure an expert!
|
Bitchin about the author or the article.. typical of your kind.
You claim you are blind... so I guess you missed.
Quote:
pointed out by British climate scientist Nicholas Lewis.
|
__________________
Remember To Help Old Friends Thoroughbred Retirement Center.
|
|
|
02-24-2019, 12:35 AM
|
#79
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OntheRail
Bitchin about the author or the article.. typical of your kind.
You claim you are blind... so I guess you missed.
|
Quote:
pointed out by British climate scientist Nicholas Lewis.
|
Howver:
Nic Lewis’ academic background is mathematics, with a minor in physics, at Cambridge University (UK). His career has been outside academia. Two or three years ago, he returned to his original scientific and mathematical interests and, being interested in the controversy surrounding AGW, started to learn about climate science.
.................................................. ..........................
So so far, (although not a climatologist) he is one of the minority of professionals (<3%) versus the 97% of climatologists who agree humans absolutely are altering climate. Never said there were NO deniers with at least some sort of credentials. But you gents as usual are ignoring the vast majority to nitpick
__________________
The inmates have taken over the asylum.
Last edited by hcap; 02-24-2019 at 12:38 AM.
|
|
|
02-24-2019, 12:47 AM
|
#80
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker
|
Sorry Breitbart is meaningless. Talk science please. Btw, I have already addressed practical remedies. That is while there is still time left to do anything.
See #43
"Alarmism" is only an idiotic way to devalue the consensus, but the science remains
__________________
The inmates have taken over the asylum.
Last edited by hcap; 02-24-2019 at 01:00 AM.
|
|
|
02-24-2019, 01:03 AM
|
#82
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmyb
|
Not the full story Already discussed.
See Post #24
__________________
The inmates have taken over the asylum.
|
|
|
02-24-2019, 01:16 AM
|
#83
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Sorry Breitbart is meaningless. Talk science please.
|
He says without proof or discussion. So you dismiss the issues raised without addressing them?
And even if your "science" is correct, what good is it if the vast majority of governments in the world opt to ignore it? Politics trump science here, and you ignore the reality of that issue. You can't prove "global warming" as anything other than a cycle we have been through before, and even if you could, no one cares.
Have fun with this.
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
02-24-2019, 01:23 AM
|
#84
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clocker
He says without proof or discussion. So you dismiss the issues raised without addressing them?
And even if your "science" is correct, what good is it if the vast majority of governments in the world opt to ignore it? Politics trump science here, and you ignore the reality of that issue. You can't prove "global warming" as anything other than a cycle we have been through before, and even if you could, no one cares.
Have fun with this.
|
You are not paying attention. Already discussed on this thread.
See #43
http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/s...3&postcount=43
__________________
The inmates have taken over the asylum.
|
|
|
02-24-2019, 01:44 AM
|
#85
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
You are not paying attention. Already discussed on this thread.
|
You are not paying attention. "Global warming" is a political issue, not a scientific issue. It's been warmer, and it's been cooler. Rinse and repeat. Most politicians don't care about it and want it to go away.
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
02-24-2019, 02:36 AM
|
#86
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 11,474
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Sorry Breitbart is meaningless. Talk science please. Btw, I have already addressed practical remedies. That is while there is still time left to do anything.
See #43
"Alarmism" is only an idiotic way to devalue the consensus, but the science remains
|
CHINA
You keep avoiding the question, what is your answer for CHINA?
You want to bankrupt our 10% producing CO2 country in an effort for what?
|
|
|
02-24-2019, 08:12 AM
|
#87
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,655
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OntheRail
Bitchin about the author or the article.. typical of your kind.
You claim you are blind... so I guess you missed.
|
unless it is the comedian Bill Nye the Science Guy
|
|
|
02-24-2019, 01:55 PM
|
#88
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemon Drop Husker
CHINA
You keep avoiding the question, what is your answer for CHINA?
You want to bankrupt our 10% producing CO2 country in an effort for what?
|
Let me get this straight. The 97% consensus of climatologist, scientific organizations, and universities who agree that we humans are influencing the atmosphere, also agree those humans messing up the atmosphere, only live in China?
__________________
The inmates have taken over the asylum.
|
|
|
02-24-2019, 01:58 PM
|
#89
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,163
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
deniers is an anti-semantic derogatory term ... we are skeptics
|
I don't know that I've ever seen the phrase "anti-semantic." I'll have to look around and see if I can find other places where that phrase appears.
|
|
|
02-24-2019, 01:58 PM
|
#90
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,655
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
|
If 70% of the pollution in the oceans and pollution in the air is coming from Asia, wouldn't it be appropriate to focus your attention there?
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|