Chalk one up for the truth

[stuball]

Originally Posted by Stevecsd2

I counted up the pictures. There were 98 pictures. I identified at least 65 of them as black. Hemal Jhaveri seems to be way off base. She should be fired because she must have failed 3rd grade arithmetic.

More seriously, this is what happens when people become so biased that everything is the fault of white males.

She was tutored by mosty

[stuball]

Originally Posted by mostpost

I didn’t write that at all. We can’t just lump all shootings of multiple persons into one category. Doing so makes it impossible to solve the problem. Or rather to solve the problems.

Some mass shootings are caused by gangs and conditions in the inner city. Did you know that several of the shootings listed in the wiki article included shootouts with police. Many are related to domestic and workplace violence.
If two gangs engage in a shootout in Englewood, it’s news in Chicago, but you never hear of it anywhere else.

The high profile, high fatality, national killings are almost always perpetrated by white men. Until you people admit that, we will never solve the problem.

In the purest definition that would be called "CHERRY PICKING" keep going see how far you can take this how many are left handed? how man got past 5th grade in school ? etc etc etc how many puked today???

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by mostpost

The high profile, high fatality, national killings are almost always perpetrated by white men. Until you people admit that, we will never solve the problem.

Yeah, those are the ones that are COVERED by the MSM!

Do you wonder why? It promotes their false narrative. Dope. That's why SOME get MASS COVERAGE while others DO NOT.

What does "NATIONAL KILLINGS" even mean?

As for "HIGH FATAILITY" there is a STANDARD DEFINTION for MASS SHOOTINGS. And it has nothing to do with the ethnicity of the shooter.

A MASS SHOOTING is a MASS SHOOTING, period.

[OntheRail]

Originally Posted by mostpost

I didn’t write that at all. We can’t just lump all shootings of multiple persons into one category. Doing so makes it impossible to solve the problem. Or rather to solve the problems.

Some mass shootings are caused by gangs and conditions in the inner city. Did you know that several of the shootings listed in the wiki article included shootouts with police. Many are related to domestic and workplace violence.
If two gangs engage in a shootout in Englewood, it’s news in Chicago, but you never hear of it anywhere else.

The high profile, high fatality, national killings are almost always perpetrated by white men. Until you people admit that, we will never solve the problem.

No tying "Qualifiers" to crimes is the problem. Mass shooting are mass shooting. It's when you prioritize AGENDA over TRUTH to support a narrative.


Very much in the vain of America is Systemically Racist... Or that Only Whites are Racist. Both of these are in fact LIES.

Or

Conservatives are White Nationalist. Trump Supports are Insurrectionist.... again LIES.

[OntheRail]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Yeah, those are the ones that are COVERED by the MSM!

Do you wonder why? It promotes their false narrative. Dope. That's why SOME get MASS COVERAGE while others DO NOT.

What does "NATIONAL KILLINGS" even mean?

As for "HIGH FATAILITY" there is a STANDARD DEFINTION for MASS SHOOTINGS. And it has nothing to do with the ethnicity of the shooter.

A MASS SHOOTING is a MASS SHOOTING, period.

Rating... Supports liberal agenda.

[xtb]

Originally Posted by mostpost

High profile, mass killings-the kind covered by cable news-are almost exclusively committed by white men. I can only assume they are angry. I refer to shootings such as Columbine, Aurora, Co. Movie theater, Orlando gay night club, Las Vegas, El Paso, Pittsburgh Synagogue, Wisconsin Sikh temple.

Places where random people are targeted by disturbed individuals in a public place. Incidents like gang warfare, drive by shootings, drug deals gone bad, domestic disputes are very serious matters but belong in a different category.

Hey dopey Mostie (even Newman isn't this stupid), the Orlando shooting was one of the worst with over 100 shot and 49 killed and you are saying it was done by a "white man"?

You left out dozens of other "high profile" mass shootings by non "white men".

[Dave Schwartz]

Originally Posted by davew

filters changing the facts and truth

You really need some kind of SARCASM emoji, lest people think you really believe this stuff.

[JustRalph]

Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz

You really need some kind of SARCASM emoji, lest people think you really believe this stuff.

He’s a master of making me read it twice

[Stevecsd2]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Yeah, those are the ones that are COVERED by the MSM!

Do you wonder why? It promotes their false narrative. Dope. That's why SOME get MASS COVERAGE while others DO NOT.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ THIS 1000% ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[davew]

Originally Posted by mostpost

“it’s always an angry man, always” is nonsense. But more often than not, it is an angry white man. And the greater the number of fatalities, the greater the chance the perpetrator was a white man.

do you gave any data to support that, or is it something you heard on msnbc?



and would 30% qualify as 'more often than not'?