|
|
10-16-2018, 12:15 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,566
|
Head-scratcher at Parx
The first race at Parx today(Monday) featured a competitive field of 7 horses (after the obligatory 2 late scratches)...and after spending considerable time handicapping it, I concluded that the would be a solid bet if I could get odds of about 3-1. The only other serious contenders in the race seemed to me to be the and the ...and they shared identical front-running styles which figured (to me at least) to be a disadvantage in a race seemingly loaded with early speed. The figured to get a perfect trip in the race...and had the ability to take proper advantage of it. But, to my great surprise, I noticed that the nondescript was getting hammered on the board...eventually going off at the unbelievable odds of 3-2!. Although I make it a point to never ignore seemingly illogical betting action such as this, I couldn't persuade myself that the "overbet" was a legitimate contender in this race...and I proceeded (although gingerly) to place my money on the "logical" .
The and the jumped into the predictable early speed battle, my settled into the golden trip that I had envisioned, the overrated was languishing in last place...and all was right with the world. Alas...my smug feeling was short-lived, because the uncorked a furious late rally which saw him swallow up the entire field...including my "logical" . And I have come here hoping to learn that someone here can make a convincing case for the betting action on this ...otherwise, my dark suspicions are sure to interfere with my sleep.
Thanks in advance.
Last edited by thaskalos; 10-16-2018 at 12:19 AM.
|
|
|
10-16-2018, 12:18 AM
|
#2
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
No big mystery here Gus, it's simply.....PARX..
|
|
|
10-16-2018, 12:36 AM
|
#3
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReplayRandall
No big mystery here Gus, it's simply.....PARX..
|
Watch race #5 today.....same huge closing kick from the , only difference was this horse paid 15-1 instead of 3-2....AND ran down the 3-5 Favorite!
https://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-rac...rx-on-10-15-18
Last edited by ReplayRandall; 10-16-2018 at 12:37 AM.
|
|
|
10-16-2018, 12:44 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,566
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReplayRandall
|
When a longshot wins the race, it doesn't bother me much. The only time I get annoyed is when the longshot wins...at odds that are reserved for the favorite.
|
|
|
10-16-2018, 01:22 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: burnaby bc canada
Posts: 332
|
The info I use has that the 2 and the 4 are the only horses that were not racing in restricted company in their last few races; so everything else in there was rising in class today. I'd take the 4 over the 2 based on form.
Also, this Howard Brown Jr. character seems like a pretty bettable trainer; 31% off a trainer change (5 out of 16 is a pretty useful sample size).
Wouldn't touch him at all at 9-5, but I can see it happening. Question that has to be answered is "who is Dave Cannizzo (trainer in previous race)" and what's his relationship with Howard Brown Jr? Note that there's just a trainer change, the horse wasn't claimed out of its previous race.
Mike
|
|
|
10-16-2018, 01:23 AM
|
#6
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
When a longshot wins the race, it doesn't bother me much. The only time I get annoyed is when the longshot wins...at odds that are reserved for the favorite.
|
You're talking like you're playing 4-D chess, maybe you should give up the ponies...
|
|
|
10-16-2018, 01:42 AM
|
#7
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1,831
|
Nothing terrible shocking here. The price can be anything, dependent on how much those that think the horse will win decide to risk at the windows.
Big class edge IF they can get the horse right. Seems to like wet tracks as well, earning a back 104 fig
Would I bet the 4 at those odds? Probably not.
But, I'd bet less than zero on the 9 at 7/2, whose trainer is 0-36 with an 8% itm. Sure the horse ran a decent second. Not the point.
Dave Cannizzo, is the NY trainer. Obviously, this horse not fit to run in NY for whatever reason, but appreciates the trees and lakes of PA
Last edited by AltonKelsey; 10-16-2018 at 01:43 AM.
|
|
|
10-16-2018, 01:48 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,566
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AltonKelsey
Nothing terrible shocking here. The price can be anything, dependent on how much those that think the horse will win decide to risk at the windows.
Big class edge IF they can get the horse right. Seems to like wet tracks as well, earning a back 104 fig
Would I bet the 4 at those odds? Probably not.
But, I'd bet less than zero on the 9 at 7/2, whose trainer is 0-36 with an 8% itm. Sure the horse ran a decent second. Not the point.
Dave Cannizzo, is the NY trainer. Obviously, this horse not fit to run in NY for whatever reason, but appreciates the trees and lakes of PA
|
Tell me...if YOU were making a betting line for this race, what price would you list the at?
|
|
|
10-16-2018, 01:53 AM
|
#9
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
Tell me...if YOU were making a betting line for this race, what price would you list the at?
|
Better yet, since your suspicions were raised on the being pounded down for no apparent reason, did you make a 4-9 exacta saver to cover your investment in the race?....It sounds like you did not.
|
|
|
10-16-2018, 02:07 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,566
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReplayRandall
Better yet, since your suspicions were raised on the being pounded down for no apparent reason, did you make a 4-9 exacta saver to cover your investment in the race?....It sounds like you did not.
|
No...I did not. But I bet less on the than I normally would.
|
|
|
10-16-2018, 02:50 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 686
|
My selection process had the as a clear legit favorite for whatever reason. Now I reviewed this in my logs tonight because of this post. I am surprised at the late action in the pools on this horse, I'm ok at calculating final odds, but not so this race.
my computer dutch bet (2 horses to win)
ROI upon bet: 96 and 107
ROI after race: 40 and 120
I think I'd chalk this up to too much late action and move on, no sense in losing sleep over it or even trying to rationalize it it's a little mini black swan.
|
|
|
10-16-2018, 03:46 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: buffalo new york
Posts: 127
|
4 horse mystery
2nd race over the track,new owner,new trainer,the race is loaded with speed,This horse comes from off the pace,Is a huge class drop,And second time in for a new low.Get some sleep now.
Last edited by theotherside; 10-16-2018 at 03:58 AM.
|
|
|
10-16-2018, 09:44 AM
|
#13
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
|
Didn't you just post the other day about this kind of betting action?
|
|
|
10-16-2018, 09:56 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,465
|
I can't speak to the odds since I don't have the PPs for the respective races but the winner's performances do make sense when looking at the early pace relative to the slow final times. In the 5th race in particular, the optical illusion of a "huge closing kick " was actually the result of the race utterly collapsing after running an opening quarter in 21 and change in a race with a final time of 1:13 and change. The winner merely just wisely layed far off it allowing him to far outrun his odds.
|
|
|
10-16-2018, 11:35 AM
|
#15
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobphilo
I can't speak to the odds since I don't have the PPs for the respective races but the winner's performances do make sense when looking at the early pace relative to the slow final times. In the 5th race in particular, the optical illusion of a "huge closing kick " was actually the result of the race utterly collapsing after running an opening quarter in 21 and change in a race with a final time of 1:13 and change. The winner merely just wisely layed far off it allowing him to far outrun his odds.
|
You are in error, the opening 1/4 was :22.1, the 1/2 in :46.2 and the 5/8 in 1:00, and this is a MSW finishing in 1:13.3.....guess that's what you get from PA-bred races.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|