Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 04-30-2009, 03:40 PM   #1
Spendabuck85
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 350
D. Wayne Lukas on synthetic surfaces

From Paul Moran blog:

When questioned about his opinion on synthetic surfaces, Lukas said that the new surfaces such as Keeneland’s Polytrack don’t just pose problems to those horses who don’t run their best over it.

“I’m not a synthetic person. I think it’s caused a nightmare for the bettors. The very lifeblood of our industry is the gambling public, and I think they’ve been put at such a disadvantage trying to sort this thing out,” Lukas said. “I think it’ll run its course, and maybe in a couple years, they’ll dig them all up and get back to natural dirt.

“They have that Gamblers Anonymous for people who have that bad gambling habit. Polytrack will take care of that. They won’t need to worry about that anymore. People will quit gambling.”

http://paulmoranattheraces.blogspot.com/
Spendabuck85 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-30-2009, 05:09 PM   #2
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Absolutely!
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-30-2009, 05:28 PM   #3
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,248
Another time I agree with D. Wayne. That makes three times all told.
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
46zilzal is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-30-2009, 05:31 PM   #4
toussaud
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46zilzal
Another time I agree with D. Wayne. That makes three times all told.
what where the other 2?
toussaud is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-30-2009, 05:36 PM   #5
tribecaagent
Veteran
 
tribecaagent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 678
I get a kick out of Wayne and he's at his best in front of a microphone. One thing I thought about was Larry Jones keeps getting attention because of his stellar record in the Derby. What about Wayne? He said earlier in the week "this isn't my first barbecue." Classic Wayne. Bravo.

Flying Private will be 50-1 and I certainly will use him.
tribecaagent is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-30-2009, 05:36 PM   #6
Onion Monster
Registered User
 
Onion Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Western Kentucky
Posts: 273
I think poly has a future more as fake turf than fake dirt. I would like to see some of the mid-level tracks with sparse turf courses look into putting poly in its place while leaving the dirt track alone. I have no idea about the feasibility of such a project, though.
__________________
Is there no standard anymore?
Onion Monster is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-30-2009, 05:38 PM   #7
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by toussaud
what where the other 2?
HE TWICE mentioned that he chooses the individual over the theoretical in breeding. I agreed both times.
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
46zilzal is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-30-2009, 06:17 PM   #8
Bruddah
Veteran
 
Bruddah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spendabuck85
From Paul Moran blog:

When questioned about his opinion on synthetic surfaces, Lukas said that the new surfaces such as Keeneland’s Polytrack don’t just pose problems to those horses who don’t run their best over it.

“I’m not a synthetic person. I think it’s caused a nightmare for the bettors. The very lifeblood of our industry is the gambling public, and I think they’ve been put at such a disadvantage trying to sort this thing out,” Lukas said. “I think it’ll run its course, and maybe in a couple years, they’ll dig them all up and get back to natural dirt.

“They have that Gamblers Anonymous for people who have that bad gambling habit. Polytrack will take care of that. They won’t need to worry about that anymore. People will quit gambling.”

http://paulmoranattheraces.blogspot.com/
I always liked D Wayne. His statements show he knows and understands Horse Racing from the important side of the equation. (The Horsemen and Bettors) The other side, the Administrators ( usually Blue Bloods) do not have a clue.

Last edited by Bruddah; 04-30-2009 at 06:20 PM.
Bruddah is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-30-2009, 06:20 PM   #9
toussaud
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,005
dangit lukas you are making it hard for me to hate you
toussaud is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 04-30-2009, 06:46 PM   #10
Imriledup
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,988
I love the coach!


Here's the thing. Lets compare the biggest bettor in the country to the biggest owner in the country. If the biggest owner stops owning and sells off all his horses, someone will take his place. Someone else will own his dispersed horses. He'll leave the game and no one will really notice from a financial perspective. Owners contribute nothing financially to the game in the sense that one owner is exactly the same as the other. If the richest guy in the world sells one horse to the poorest guy in the world, that horse still has the same exact effect on the game. Its one more horse in the entry box.

But, if the biggest bettor in the game stops betting, he can't be replaced overnight. Or ever.

When the synthetic nazi's mandated synthetic tracks, no one asked the bettors if they wanted change. The biggest bettors in the USA are the most winningest bettors (by definition) and no one asked them if they wanted their successful business tinkered with. No one asked them, they just went ahead and did it.
Imriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-01-2009, 11:32 AM   #11
joanied
Registered User
 
joanied's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wyoming, near Yellowstone Park...born/raised in Brooklyn,NY
Posts: 7,557
Good ol' D Wayne...I wish more trainers would step up and speak up on the fake stuff... besides the handicapping side of it....has it really prooved safer for the horses? I don't think so.
__________________
joanied

"All we have to do is decide what to do with the time that is given to us"
Gandalf the Grey
joanied is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-01-2009, 03:19 PM   #12
Spendabuck85
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 350
From the Andy Beyer DRF Chat transcript:

Andrew_Beyer: I'd hate to see any further conversions to synthetic tracks, at Churchill Downs or anywhere else. The safety arguments in their favor were a little bit skewed, in my opinion. Tracks were installing new, state-of-the-art $10 million racing surfaces and comparing them with dirt strips that had been around for 50 years. There are plenty of dirt tracks with excellent safety records--Saratoga, for example.
Spendabuck85 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-01-2009, 03:21 PM   #13
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,248
Not only are the qualitatively different, but within Polytrack there are three separate types, then cushion and Tapeta
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
46zilzal is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.