The AmWager Advantage - Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com

Gorrex · 08-23-2019, 12:51 PM

Right now players using AmWager have an advantage over other ADW users.

AmWager players see odds and pool changes up to 2 minutes faster than other ADWs. The best competitor is up to 30 seconds behind us.

AmWager players who use conditional wagers enjoy continual condition matching where others check one time at the MTP condition. If odds change sometime after that MTP check on AmWager you get the bet, on others you dont.

Some have Dutching, some have ABC

AmWager has both Dutch wagering, ABC wagering and our own custom Rank modifier which anyone with a probability line may enjoy.

Other ADWs make you wait for your statement till hours after racing, the next day etc.. Ours is available always for your entire history.

Results, Replays, odds, willpays, EVERYTHING is available indefinitely. No archives, no deletions.

Next week AmWager players will be able to see takeout rates simply by looking at the pool totals table.

We offer competitive rewards for all players on most tracks. Even if you get a better rate at another provider you should still be using AmWager to help construct your bets. (Seriously we are okay with it..)

We are the only ADW continually improving our product specifically for bettors and have no plans of stopping anytime soon. Other ADWs can keep sending their design guys to see what we are up to, that's okay too.. you'll still be playing catch up.

For any player that hasnt tried AmWager or hasnt tried AmWager in the last year or so.. why the hell not? Even if you are in a state (or a different country) that can't wager on our site you can still take advantage of our odds updates and bet structuring tools.

Gorrex · 08-23-2019, 02:15 PM

If you want to discuss our rewards schedule reach out to Papo at:

pmorales@amwager.com

djm1959 · 08-23-2019, 07:16 PM

still cant fund with multiple bank accounts...and no credit card method either

oh well-other ADW accounts like my money

Dave Schwartz · 08-23-2019, 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djm1959

still cant fund with multiple bank accounts...and no credit card method either

oh well-other ADW accounts like my money

Gotta tell you that you are missing the boat with these guys.

They are the good guys. If there is a glitch, they'll get it fixed. At the end of the day, they are the best.

(Even if you have to use just one account.)

Just my opinion.

Gorrex · 08-24-2019, 09:13 AM

If you are having g an issue adding multiple ACH accounts send me an email and I'll get it resolved. First I've seen or heard of anyone having that issue.

Cc peice is still held up with banks, mergers, legal opinions shifting . Fun stuff.

takewinbet · 08-24-2019, 10:36 AM

conditional wagering? get this

Stack Id db8e22641b654c0384b7d8a25e16df63 had a failure. ErrorId = 2974d6dc-0304-4934-bd78-0e7fe2697954

Gorrex · 08-24-2019, 11:51 AM

What day/time was it attempted so I can pull up the logs.

thaskalos · 08-24-2019, 04:58 PM

Why do our state governments allow wagering with one ADW...and not with another?

Jeff P · 08-24-2019, 06:23 PM

It's almost never the state regulatory body who actively makes that decision.

It's almost always leadership of the local horsemen's alphabet group along with track management who quietly tell the state regulatory body "not that adw."

The state regulatory body rubber stamps the decision made by the local horsemen and track management --

And in so doing creates the illusion of an open marketplace.

-jp

.

FocusWiz · 08-24-2019, 08:54 PM

Some ADWs seem to report results based on the lowest wager allowed or some common wager amount. Am I correct that AmWager reports all results based on an assumed $2 wager (including superfectas and other exotics). I seem to recall that but may be confusing you with some other ADW.

buffaloxp · 08-24-2019, 09:24 PM

When your cover Singapore track

Gorrex · 08-26-2019, 08:33 AM

Multiple responses here:

On states

As Jeff P says, some cases it is approvals as he said.

Other's such as Washington and Virginia have far to high source market fee's to make it worth it. I'm not entirely against source market fee's but they need to be realistic given the other dozen hands in the pot.

Other's are monopoly licenses by law and need a bit of lobby grease to win that.

On prices

Yes, we do always show the $2.00 payout. This was a conscious choice. If enough users would like it to be show minimum based payouts we could pretty easily add a preference to do either or. (its actually more complicated to show the $2.00 payout)

On Singapore

Our tote provider is still testing with Sky/Singapore on this. I do not have a timeframe.

On the bugs mentioned
I have tested both issues mentioned above extensively and could not replicate either one. If you are having issues still please reach out to me as I need more information to find them.

djm1959 · 08-30-2019, 02:15 PM

how i contact you? tried again still not accepted....?

barn32 · 08-30-2019, 02:31 PM

You seem to have your finger on the pulse of things, so let me ask you this: Do you foresee exchange wagering of any kind anytime soon (other than New Jersey)?

And how do you feel about it vis-a-vis your business model--are you for it or against it?

Gorrex · 08-30-2019, 07:06 PM

It is coming in other states.

It could be very complimentary to existing ADW and parimutuel done correctly. I'm much more in favor of it than fixed odds ... But that will come also just due to market pressure.

Parimutuel will likely spread in sports as well. Currently in large single markets a bit but mainly once/if wore act gets out of the way.