This is an excellent article and a long one; but it's very informative. The writer (with a background in science) nicely makes a powerful case (with great analogies, I might add) for how all three tie in nicely together. He also makes a strong case for how legitimate science was largely avoided by many governments and public health officials in order to create this "pandemic" -- which is not the first time in history this has been done! (In fact, the writer points out that the term "pandemic" itself was actually redefined by WHO to help sustain the fraudulent narrative!). This story has a lot of its own moving parts, but here's a little taste of where the author is going:
PCR Tests and the Rise of Disease Panic
Investigating the cause of a disease is like investigating the cause of a crime. Just as the detection of a suspect’s DNA at a crime scene doesn’t prove they committed the crime, so the detection of the DNA of a virus in a patient doesn’t prove it caused the disease.
Consider the case of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) for example. It can cause serious diseases like arthritis, multiple sclerosis and cancer. A Japanese study in 2003 found that 43% of patients suffering from Chronic Active Epstein-Barr Virus (CAEBV) died within 5 months to 12 years of infection.
Yet EBV is one of the most common viruses in humans and has been detected in 95% of the adult population. Most of those infected are either asymptomatic or show symptoms of glandular fever, which can have similar symptoms to ‘long Covid.’
If an advertising agency attempted to create demand for an EBV treatment with daily TV and radio ads representing positive EBV tests as ‘EBV Cases’ and deaths within 28 days as ‘EBV Deaths,’ they’d be prosecuted for fraud by false representation so quickly their feet wouldn’t touch the ground.
Many of us knew knew early on during this scamdemic that the PCR test was fatally flawed. In fact, the test was never designed to be a diagnostic tool. Even the CDC has admitted this -- probably reluctantly to cover its legal bases -- just not in those precise terms. Of course, others have as well. But the con artists are skilled in their trade and have managed to hide this inconvenient truth about PCR tests by burying it in an avalanche of rhetorical "noise" -- somehow pretending that these tests were still legitimate and the best way to go for testing.
Even the inventor of PCR, Kary Mullis, who won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993, vehemently opposed using PCR to diagnose diseases: “PCR is a process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of something. It allows you to take a very miniscule amount of anything and make it measurable and then talk about it like it’s important.“
Perhaps the biggest flaw to PCR is that it can't measure
quantitatively. It only measures qualitatively, therefore, it ignores this scientific law (or principle):
The Dose Makes The Poison
Anything can be deadly in high enough doses, even oxygen and water. Since the time of Paracelsus in the 16th century, science has known there are no such things as poisons, only poisonous concentrations:
“All things are poison, and nothing is without poison; the dosage alone makes the poison.” (Paracelsus, dritte defensio, 1538.)
This basic principle is expressed in the adage “dosis sola facit venenum“ – the dose alone makes the poison – and is the basis for all Public Health Standards which specify Maximum Permissible Doses (MPDs) for all known health hazards, from chemicals and radiation to bacteria, viruses and even noise.
https://brownstone.org/articles/pcr-...disease-panic/
The article gets even much better from here as he goes on to discuss Public Health Standards, Science and Law.
