Your ideal Supreme Court

[mostpost]

Let’s try a fun exercise. Imagine you have been elected President of the United States, and every seat on the Supreme Court has become open. Who would you nominate to the bench?

Two things to keep in mind. You can nominate anyone currently on the Supreme Court. Confirmation is not a concern at this time.

Here is my list.

Sonya Sotomayor
John Roberts
Elena Kayan
Barack Obama
Mitt Romney
William Jefferson Clinton
Ketanji Brown Jackson
Amy Cooney Barrett. (Somewhat reluctantly.)
Adam Schiff

Let’s hear yours.

[PaceAdvantage]

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

I expected nothing less from you. Maybe someone is interested in an intelligent conversation.

[PaceAdvantage]

Why would you want an accused rapist (one William Jefferson Clinton) on the Supreme Court? I thought the Kavanaugh hearings made it clear that Democrats like you frown upon that kind of thing.

Plus his middle name is Jefferson, which disqualifies him right off the bat, if the summer of 2020 taught us anything, it taught us that.

Carry on...Mr. Hypocrite of the highest order.

[OntheRail]

Originally Posted by mostpost

I expected nothing less from you. Maybe someone is interested in an intelligent conversation.

Neither did I... but I thought it was right on point.

As for the balance... heading for greener threads cause this is anything but intelligent. Adam Schiff and Dis Barred Slick Willie

[tucker6]

Originally Posted by mostpost

Let’s try a fun exercise. Imagine you have been elected President of the United States, and every seat on the Supreme Court has become open. Who would you nominate to the bench?

Two things to keep in mind. You can nominate anyone currently on the Supreme Court. Confirmation is not a concern at this time.

Here is my list.

Sonya Sotomayor
John Roberts
Elena Kayan
Barack Obama
Mitt Romney
William Jefferson Clinton
Ketanji Brown Jackson
Amy Cooney Barrett. (Somewhat reluctantly.)
Adam Schiff

Let’s hear yours.

We already have a joke thread. Why start another one?

[Marshall Bennett]

A fun exercise?? You fell off the treadmill with your first choice. She's a disgrace to SCOTUS. Willing to openly make false statements about COVID figures, and voice her distrust of our constitution routinely.
She's probably the worst ever to sit on the court.

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by mostpost

I expected nothing less from you. Maybe someone is interested in an intelligent conversation.

You arrogant airhead! How many times have we asked you libs (even you in particular) questions which you never answer. You think you are so smart but you're dumber than a sack of rocks. You remind me of this proverb:

Prov 27:22
22 Crush a fool in a mortar with a pestle
along with crushed grain,
yet his folly will not depart from him.
ESV

[davew]

I would like my justices to have experience being a judge, not being a mostly corrupt politician.

[tucker6]

Originally Posted by davew

I would like my justices to have experience being a judge, not being a mostly corrupt politician.

What about being a community organizer?

[Tom]

Originally Posted by davew

I would like my justices to have experience being a judge, not being a mostly corrupt politician.

mosties court dosen't need law experience, they will make it up as they go, just they did/do in office.

My pick, the 1977 Yankees. Already better than doophuses picks. My guys are winners.

He lost me at Soto-dodo, a proven idiot.

[JustRalph]

Clone Clarence Thomas 8 times

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by JustRalph

Clone Clarence Thomas 8 times

I'm good with that.

[proximity]

track, pace, class, ralph, randall, kalos, dilane, tucker, the other tucker

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Why would you want an accused rapist (one William Jefferson Clinton) on the Supreme Court? I thought the Kavanaugh hearings made it clear that Democrats like you frown upon that kind of thing.

Plus his middle name is Jefferson, which disqualifies him right off the bat, if the summer of 2020 taught us anything, it taught us that.

Carry on...Mr. Hypocrite of the highest order.

We frown upon it when it actually happens. There is a lot more corroboration for the accusations against Kavenaugh then for those against Clinton.

I don’t think I have ever heard anything more ridiculous than your idea Clinton should be disqualified because of his middle name. In the first place, do we even know he was named after Thomas? Maybe he was named after George Jefferson. In the second, why should he be punished for the actions of someone 200 years ago.