I am not sure my post's on how I use the data is making any sense but here is the Finger Lakes sheet for tomorrow, I marked up the 8th like I do...
http://localpcpros.com/flr8.pdf
This could all change with scratches but as of right now I would consider the favorite in that race a Best Bet for me.
I highlight the top 3 in each area, then mark the worst one from each, any with a knock from there is put as non contender for win.
with pace the knock is on the lowest that is not one of the 3 highest in its opposite area so if the lowest late is one of the top 3 early, i look at the next lowest late etc until I find the lowest that is not one of the top 3 and vice-versa.
then I have my contenders, I look at running style and running type, is it a race that will e won early or other than early?
is there a lone running style.
from there I look only at the PCR and my CLASS Rating to eliminate any contender who is outclassed.
after that and I have not gotten to putting it on the summary page, I take a look at who is riding and who is training to see if maybe I sould rethink my decision.
I am soooooo interested in what is working for others !
Since the summary has come along I only look at the full pp's report at the very end to make sure I did not overlook anything.
Excuse in last race making them a non contender when they should not be, crap jock or trainer, 700 days of rest, 25 and 0 at the distance, etc, etc...
