Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 07-12-2018, 08:18 AM   #1
formula_2002
what an easy game.
 
formula_2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,096
nato-funding-explained-

https://money.cnn.com/2017/05/25/new...ump/index.html

worth the read.

Question.how much of our defense budget is spent outside of our NATO operations?
__________________
Peace on earth, good will to all
GOD BLESS AMERICA

" I pass with relief from the tossing sea of cause and theory to the firm ground of result and fact"
Winston Churchill

Last edited by formula_2002; 07-12-2018 at 08:28 AM.
formula_2002 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2018, 08:36 AM   #2
formula_2002
what an easy game.
 
formula_2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,096
here is another interesting link

https://www.theglobalist.com/nato-de...nding-members/
__________________
Peace on earth, good will to all
GOD BLESS AMERICA

" I pass with relief from the tossing sea of cause and theory to the firm ground of result and fact"
Winston Churchill
formula_2002 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2018, 09:01 AM   #3
formula_2002
what an easy game.
 
formula_2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,096
does our 3%+ defense budget include wars that NATO was not involved in ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catego...involving_NATO

https://www.pgpf.org/chart-archive/0...nse-comparison
__________________
Peace on earth, good will to all
GOD BLESS AMERICA

" I pass with relief from the tossing sea of cause and theory to the firm ground of result and fact"
Winston Churchill
formula_2002 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2018, 09:21 AM   #4
formula_2002
what an easy game.
 
formula_2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 43,096
the best I can determine, the 3.75 % we spend on defense, covers all our cost of which NATO operations are included.

We of course have military cost beyond our NATO obligations

2017 gdp = $19390.60 billion dollars x .0357 = $727 billion dollars
__________________
Peace on earth, good will to all
GOD BLESS AMERICA

" I pass with relief from the tossing sea of cause and theory to the firm ground of result and fact"
Winston Churchill
formula_2002 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2018, 09:41 AM   #5
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
The whole thing is stupid.

All NATO members agreed in 2014 to increase spending to the 2% everyone on here is complaining about by 2024.

All are complying with that.

1) Trump goes into NATO.
2) Creates complete and total sideshow.
3) Accomplishes nothing.
4) Claims victory.

Its all very similar to North Korea and other issues... where he manufactures or exacerbates a problem, doesn't solve it, claims victory, and moves on.

Quote:
“Everyone agreed to raise spending, in line with commitments made in 2014,” [French President] Macron said. “I think NATO has emerged from these last few days much stronger.”
Can't wait for the UK and Russia visits...
elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2018, 09:57 AM   #6
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,445
F 2014.

There's a new sheriff in town.
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2018, 10:00 AM   #7
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
F 2014.

There's a new sheriff in town.
Who got nothing...

Deal-maker-in-chief...

Bathe in all this #MAGA!!!!

Official Text: Brussels Summit Declaration
Issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Brussels 11-12 July 2018


Quote:
We reaffirm our unwavering commitment to all aspects of the Defence Investment Pledge agreed at the 2014 Wales Summit, and to submit credible national plans on its implementation, including the spending guidelines for 2024, planned capabilities, and contributions. Fair burden sharing underpins the Alliance’s cohesion, solidarity, credibility, and ability to fulfil our Article 3 and Article 5 commitments. We welcome the considerable progress made since the Wales Summit with four consecutive years of real growth in non-US defence expenditure. All Allies have started to increase the amount they spend on defence in real terms and some two-thirds of Allies have national plans in place to spend 2% of their Gross Domestic Product on defence by 2024. More than half of Allies are spending more than 20% of their defence expenditures on major equipment, including related research and development, and, according to their national plans, 24 Allies will meet the 20% guideline by 2024. Allies are delivering more of the heavier, high-end capabilities we require and are improving the readiness, deployability, sustainability, and interoperability of their forces. The number of activities in which we are engaged has increased, and Allies continue to make valuable force and capability contributions that benefit the security of the Euro-Atlantic area through NATO’s operations, missions, and other activities, as well as through the operations and missions conducted under national authority and the authority of other organisations. As we take stock of the national plans that exist today, we appreciate the unprecedented progress and recognise that much work still remains. We are committed to improving the balance of sharing the costs and responsibilities of Alliance membership.

Last edited by elysiantraveller; 07-12-2018 at 10:04 AM.
elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2018, 10:01 AM   #8
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,445
I think I'm going to have fun trolling you from now on.

But seriously...why the hell would 2014 matter if DJT doesn't think it was a "good deal?"

Why even bring it up as some sort of logical point? It doesn't apply anymore, obviously.
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!

Last edited by PaceAdvantage; 07-12-2018 at 10:02 AM.
PaceAdvantage is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2018, 10:07 AM   #9
elysiantraveller
Registered User
 
elysiantraveller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
I think I'm going to have fun trolling you from now on.

But seriously...why the hell would 2014 matter if DJT doesn't think it was a "good deal?"

Why even bring it up as some sort of logical point? It doesn't apply anymore, obviously.
Your new sheriff now thinks the 2014 deal was a good deal.

Seriously... at this point everyone thinks the guy is a laughingstock. Our NATO allies are currently confused as to how he is painting the Summit as a victory when all they did was agree to what was agreed to in 2014.

You guys sure eat it up though.

Last edited by elysiantraveller; 07-12-2018 at 10:09 AM.
elysiantraveller is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2018, 10:44 AM   #10
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,744
NATO is us.
Without US, there is no NATO.

If Europe can't protect itself, it doesn't deserve to be protected.

Pay up of fold up.

Enough with the continent of cowards.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2018, 10:46 AM   #11
Ocala Mike
Registered User
 
Ocala Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 5,005
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller View Post


1) Trump goes into NATO.
2) Creates complete and total sideshow.
3) Accomplishes nothing.
4) Claims victory.

5) Lies like a rug.

FTFY

He is now viewed (actually has been for a long time) by the rest of the world as an irrational actor.
Ocala Mike is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2018, 10:51 AM   #12
Clocker
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ocala Mike View Post
5)

He is now viewed (actually has been for a long time) by the rest of the world as an irrational actor.

You don't think that Twitter is an effective medium for high level international diplomacy?
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
Clocker is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2018, 10:51 AM   #13
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,744
Until they need something.

Maybe this is good - maybe , after 100 year, the cowards in Europe will realize they can't count on us and get off their fat asses and take care of themselves.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2018, 10:52 AM   #14
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,445
The rest of the world...
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-12-2018, 11:15 AM   #15
cordoba
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 104
Just F wow.
cordoba is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.