Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 08-21-2018, 08:59 PM   #121
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap View Post
Cohen may have more on Trump.
Further info from Cohen is not part of his sentencing agreement.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-22-2018, 12:54 AM   #122
hcap
Registered User
 
hcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom View Post
Further info from Cohen is not part of his sentencing agreement.
Cohen directly implicated Trump, stating that he paid porn star Stormy Daniels and Playboy model Karen McDougal “at the direction of” the candidate, “for the principal purpose of influencing the election.”

Cohen’s Guilty Plea Puts Trump in a Perilous Spot
The prospect of a criminal prosecution will loom over the rest of his presidency.


https://www.bloomberg.com/view/artic...-perilous-spot

It’s happened: Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, admitted in open court Tuesday to violating federal campaign finance laws — at the direction of a candidate who told him to do so. Cohen is saying that Trump was a principal of the crime he admits to having committed. Under federal law, that makes Trump criminally liable as an accomplice.

The closest historical analogy is when Watergate special prosecutor Leon Jaworski named President Richard Nixon as an unindicted co-conspirator. That was based in part on testimony by John Dean, who had implicated Nixon in congressional testimony while Nixon was still in office. But even Dean’s 1973 guilty plea in court to obstruction of justice did not state that he had committed his crimes at the direction of the president.
hcap is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-22-2018, 12:58 AM   #123
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap View Post
It’s happened: Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, admitted in open court Tuesday to violating federal campaign finance laws — at the direction of a candidate who told him to do so. Cohen is saying that Trump was a principal of the crime he admits to having committed. Under federal law, that makes Trump criminally liable as an accomplice.
Hilarious!

Another one taking a plea bargain and something a PROSECUTOR says is illegal - as an actual adjudication.

Prosecutors aren't judges and they aren't juries. They can say whatever they want and Cohen can plead to whatever he wants, but that has absolutely no bearing on Trump. Nothing has changed.

Do you think they can arrest Trump for campaign finance violations and forego a trial and just say, "Hey, we have this plea bargain Cohen signed and the prosecutor said he broke the law and Cohen states for the record that you told him to, so off you go to jail. No need to waste a judge and jury's time on this...it's already been decided."

What are you smoking?
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!

Last edited by PaceAdvantage; 08-22-2018 at 01:02 AM.
PaceAdvantage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-22-2018, 01:37 AM   #124
hcap
Registered User
 
hcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
Duh! It is illegal. Remember John Edwards?
Chumpy 10x worse

"Edwards's trial began on April 23, 2012, as he faced up to 30 years in prison and a $1.5 million fine. ... On May 31, 2012, Edwards was found not guilty on Count 3, illegal use of campaign funding (contributions from Rachel "Bunny" Mellon), while mistrials were declared on all other counts against him."

You cultists are the only ones making stuff up.

Rudy aficionados maybe?
hcap is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-22-2018, 03:16 AM   #125
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap View Post
Duh! It is illegal. Remember John Edwards?
Chumpy 10x worse

"Edwards's trial began on April 23, 2012, as he faced up to 30 years in prison and a $1.5 million fine. ... On May 31, 2012, Edwards was found not guilty on Count 3, illegal use of campaign funding (contributions from Rachel "Bunny" Mellon), while mistrials were declared on all other counts against him."

You cultists are the only ones making stuff up.

Rudy aficionados maybe?
Well, he actually USED CAMPAIGN FUNDS, so there's that.

The whole thing is so murky, and the law so murky, that if this is what you're hanging your hat on (flavor of the day), God help you.
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-22-2018, 06:59 AM   #126
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap View Post
Duh! It is illegal. Remember John Edwards?
Chumpy 10x worse

"Edwards's trial began on April 23, 2012, as he faced up to 30 years in prison and a $1.5 million fine. ... On May 31, 2012, Edwards was found not guilty on Count 3, illegal use of campaign funding (contributions from Rachel "Bunny" Mellon), while mistrials were declared on all other counts against him."

You cultists are the only ones making stuff up.

Rudy aficionados maybe?
dang, you are right ... how many days does he have left ? 2250 ?
davew is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-22-2018, 07:09 AM   #127
FakeNameChanged
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew View Post
2 days deliberation no verdict? the prosecutors did a bad job with what each indictment was for, and figured the average Joe would know all about shell companies, money laundering, lying on bank loan applications....
Looks like the "average Joes" got up to speed on the charges.
__________________
One of the downsides of the Internet is that it allows like-minded people to form communities, and sometimes those communities are stupid.
FakeNameChanged is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-22-2018, 07:49 AM   #128
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whosonfirst View Post
Looks like the "average Joes" got up to speed on the charges.
some of them, over half no
davew is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-22-2018, 09:01 AM   #129
upthecreek
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,956
upthecreek is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-22-2018, 09:24 AM   #130
hcap
Registered User
 
hcap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
Well, he actually USED CAMPAIGN FUNDS, so there's that.

The whole thing is so murky, and the law so murky, that if this is what you're hanging your hat on (flavor of the day), God help you.
Cohen was reimbursed by Trump. A $130,000 payment to Daniels by Cohen was reimbursed by the Trump Organization as part of more than $400,000 in expenses and fees. The payments, Cohen now admits, were made to keep damaging information from becoming public in the 2016 election — felony actions because they were unreported political contributions and exceeded campaign finance limits.

Remember 2 women, one Daniels, and the other McDougal were paid hush money just before the election. Daniels right after the Access Hollywoo fiasco. Common sense that news about Trump actually grabbing more pu*ies, would have negatively impacted his chances

The campaign laws are not murky.The payment to Daniels, intended to silence the woman, totaled $130,000 and is considered to be an in-kind contribution in excess of the maximum allowable amount. Remember the Trump organization reimbursed Cohen. Giuliani did tie Daniels’ allegation to the Trump campaign.

"Imagine if that came out on Oct. 15, 2016, in the middle of the last debate with Hillary Clinton?" Giuliani said.

Besides Cohen copped a plea yesterday ADMITTING that's what is was for
hcap is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-22-2018, 10:19 AM   #131
Saratoga_Mike
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9,893
Quote:
Originally Posted by reckless View Post
As a reminder, Mueller's indictment of Manafort was about 'money-laundering' accusations allegedly done by Manafort in the ... 1980s? 1990s? 2000s? ... basically, nothing to do about Trump, the 'Russians', and the 2017 campaign.

Lying to the FBI? Another joke.

Mueller does need to get this lawsuit tossed because if he can't the world will eventually know how stupid a prosecutor Mueller really is, trust me.
Well there's always the appeal or a pardon. What's the odds on a pardon? 50/50? But it wont matter b/c the IL and/or NY AGs will then proceed with their own charges - no pardon available at the state level, and jurisdictionally jeopardy doesn't attach.
Saratoga_Mike is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-22-2018, 10:28 AM   #132
lamboguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saratoga_Mike View Post
Well there's always the appeal or a pardon. What's the odds on a pardon? 50/50? But it wont matter b/c the IL and/or NY AGs will then proceed with their own charges - no pardon available at the state level, and jurisdictionally jeopardy doesn't attach.
if i was Manafort, i would find a country that has no extradition and will take him, and do a quick dixie out of here.
lamboguy is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-22-2018, 11:47 AM   #133
tucker6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy View Post
if i was Manafort, i would find a country that has no extradition and will take him, and do a quick dixie out of here.
Yeah because they forgot to take his passport away. Or better yet, since he is still in solitary confinement, let's forget about the whole escape thing.
tucker6 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-22-2018, 11:48 AM   #134
tucker6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by upthecreek View Post
Cappy disagrees, so...
tucker6 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-22-2018, 04:23 PM   #135
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by tucker6 View Post
Cappy disagrees, so...
He disagrees with everyone.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg hcap.JPG (9.8 KB, 0 views)
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.