 |
|
11-21-2018, 02:30 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Chumpy says "It's all Obama and Hillary's Fault".
FACT CHECK: Is The Ex-SEAL Commander Attacked By Trump A 'Hillary Clinton Fan'?
https://www.npr.org/2018/11/19/66923...ry-clinton-fan
President Trump tried to sidestep criticism from a former top military commander by insisting that retired Adm. William McRaven is simply a political player from the camp of his former opponent Hillary Clinton.
That's not so.
Trump sought to undermine McRaven's words by denying them the imprimatur of a decorated former four-star special operations commander. Instead, as the president said in a Fox News Sunday interview, they were just more carping from a "Hillary Clinton fan."
But McRaven told CNN he did not back Clinton "or anyone else" in the 2016 presidential contest. And he stood by his earlier claim that Trump's attacks on the news media represent a threat to democracy.
And now....
Reporter explains ‘most stunning thing’ about John Roberts’ rebuke of Trump
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/11/rep...-rebuke-trump/
President Donald Trump received a rare rebuke from the Republican-appointed Chief Justice of the Supreme Court on Wednesday.
John Roberts, who was appointed by George W. Bush, lashed out at Trump’s attacks on “Obama judges.”
|
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 02:41 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
FACT CHECK: Is The Ex-SEAL Commander Attacked By Trump A 'Hillary Clinton Fan'?
https://www.npr.org/2018/11/19/66923...ry-clinton-fan
President Trump tried to sidestep criticism from a former top military commander by insisting that retired Adm. William McRaven is simply a political player from the camp of his former opponent Hillary Clinton.
That's not so.
Trump sought to undermine McRaven's words by denying them the imprimatur of a decorated former four-star special operations commander. Instead, as the president said in a Fox News Sunday interview, they were just more carping from a "Hillary Clinton fan."
But McRaven told CNN he did not back Clinton "or anyone else" in the 2016 presidential contest. And he stood by his earlier claim that Trump's attacks on the news media represent a threat to democracy.
And now....
Reporter explains ‘most stunning thing’ about John Roberts’ rebuke of Trump
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/11/rep...-rebuke-trump/
President Donald Trump received a rare rebuke from the Republican-appointed Chief Justice of the Supreme Court on Wednesday.
John Roberts, who was appointed by George W. Bush, lashed out at Trump’s attacks on “Obama judges.”
|
If you and other dimwits firmly believe that all judges are impartial, mind-neutered, politically-unbiased human beings, then please tell us why the dimwits always strongly oppose any R-nominated judge. If there are no Obama or Clinton judges, then can there possibly be any Reagan or Bush judges?
And also explain Aunt Ruthie's clearly biased remarks when she swore that she will hang in there tough on the court until a dimwit president is elected.
And why did Ruthie say she would "jokingly" move to New Zealand if Trump got elected in '16?
And why do dimwits almost always shop for a liberal in some state that is under the 9 Circus?
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 02:45 PM
|
#3
|
|
self medicated
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: toga
Posts: 3,100
|
Zero credibility. Good news....I did it! Bad news, Its their fault!
Hey Commander Bone Spurs. The Admiral with years and years of service and more medals than you can count....got your panties in a bunch? 
You are half the man, shut up!
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 02:48 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bollixed-up-car
If you and other dimwits firmly believe that all judges are impartial, mind-neutered, politically-unbiased human beings, then please tell us why the dimwits always strongly oppose any R-nominated judge. If there are no Obama or Clinton judges, then can there possibly be any Reagan or Bush judges?
|
Argue with John Robrts why don'tcha?
Lately Chumpy is losing many legal challenges.
Just a matter of timer till he loses the big one 
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 02:49 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burnsy
Zero credibility. Good news....I did it! Bad news, Its their fault!
Hey Commander Bone Spurs. The Admiral with years and years of service and more medals than you can count....got your panties in a bunch?
You are half the man, shut up! |
Have you ever constructed two consecutive, coherent sentences in your life?
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 03:27 PM
|
#6
|
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,977
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by burnsy
Zero credibility. Good news....I did it! Bad news, Its their fault!
Hey Commander Bone Spurs. The Admiral with years and years of service and more medals than you can count....got your panties in a bunch?
You are half the man, shut up! |
When the Admiral steps into the political world, he better be man enough to do so.
He is now a legit target.
IF he can't handle it, he should go home.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 03:29 PM
|
#7
|
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,977
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bollixed-up-car
|
Hey Boxcar......it will like this all weekend - the little children have 4 days off from school.
You know you just shot him down and he has nothing left when he posts baby-people stuff like this one! waaa waaa waaaaaa!
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 04:59 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
|
Another non-answer. Of course, Roberts had to defend the federal courts of the land, lest his silence be construed as tacit approval to Trump's remarks.
But anyone with an IQ higher than his shoelace size knows full well that there is no such thing as anyone in this world as having a neutral world or political view, including jurists.
Even justice Kennedy openly confessed that he waited for a Republican to be elected before he retired. Are you so thick that you can't begin to fathom why he would ever do such a thing? 
And I would gladly argue with Roberts if he were here. Why don't you go invite him over here. I'd be happy to set him straight.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 05:48 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by boxcar
Another non-answer. Of course, Roberts had to defend the federal courts of the land, lest his silence be construed as tacit approval to Trump's remarks.
|
No, he had to do nothing.
You are in denial big time. Wake up and smell the pathological lying, and despicable over the top corruption.
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 06:01 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 06:19 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
The idiot...
It was absurd on its face for Trump to suggest he is more informed about the federal judiciary than the chief justice. And as many pointed out, there's little surprise that Trump's orders — which so often clearly violate establish law — are overturned in court.
It is also absurd for our phony religious scholar, now to extend his phonyness, and pretend he is a constitutional legal scholar
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 06:40 PM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
|
Another legal supporter dumps Chumpy overboard.
Maybe Alan is coming to his senses mostly
Dershowitz: Trump’s Use Of DOJ To Target Political Opponents ‘Wrong Thing To Do’
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/d...-hillary-wrong
Former Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz — who has gained notoriety in the Trump era as a frequent cable news supporter of the President — criticized President Trump on Wednesday for attempting to weaponize his Justice Department to attack his political foes.
“It’s a terrible mistake,” Dershowitz told “Fox and Friends” Wednesday morning. “You don’t want to weaponize the political differences.”
Dershowitz was responding to a Tuesday evening New York Times report that revealed Trump tried to get his Justice Department to prosecute his political nemeses Hillary Clinton and former FBI Director James Comey, before getting pushback from former White House counsel Don McGahn.
Bye bye Chumpsters 
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 06:59 PM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Hey Mr Legal scholar bollexed-up-car, Chumpy is going down so many ways. What does your legal scholarship tell you now?
Legal expert shocked by Trump ordering DOJ to investigate Clinton and Comey: ‘President Trump has 3rd grader’s idea of presidency’
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/11/leg...ea-presidency/
Last edited by hcap; 11-21-2018 at 07:01 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 08:02 PM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
The idiot...
It was absurd on its face for Trump to suggest he is more informed about the federal judiciary than the chief justice. And as many pointed out, there's little surprise that Trump's orders — which so often clearly violate establish law — are overturned in court.
It is also absurd for our phony religious scholar, now to extend his phonyness, and pretend he is a constitutional legal scholar
|
So, tell us, since you ducked the question the first time around. Why are the dimwits totally obsessed with stacking the federal courts with dimwit-nominated federal judges? If all court nominees are free from all ideological prejudices, then what difference would it make to the Senate who sits on any federal court?
And any moron with a modicum of common sense knows that Trump is absolutely correct in his assessment. There is no such animal that's there any justice in any court who is ideologically-free politically. Roberts stepped in to contradict Trump in order to perpetuate the myth to all the simple-minded and/or low-information people , such as yourself, that all justices are free from any political ideology.
No one walks around without his or her own worldview.
Methinks you should stand in front of a mirror and say, "The idiot...".
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
11-21-2018, 08:06 PM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
|
Prove that Trump ordered any such investigation. Do you have anything other than hearsay or anonymous sources?
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
