 |
|
11-16-2018, 12:32 PM
|
#181
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
|
it is temporary is it not?
|
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 12:37 PM
|
#182
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,803
|
Why can't every Journalist in the country sue to be in the White House? Then what's the Judge gonna do?
|
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 12:40 PM
|
#183
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
|
He just lost.
I'm sure they will try and "get" Acosta violating a new rule but this is over.
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 12:41 PM
|
#184
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadk66
it is temporary is it not?
|
Not temporary.
He's back until they get him breaking one of the new rules or procedures... per Sanders:
"We will also further develop rules and processes to ensure fair and orderly press conferences in the future. There must be decorum at the White House."
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 12:44 PM
|
#185
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,962
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
Not temporary.
|
The Daily Mail is reporting:
Judge said ruling was temporary but gave CNN what it wanted in the short term
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 12:49 PM
|
#186
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyfox
The Daily Mail is reporting:
Judge said ruling was temporary but gave CNN what it wanted in the short term
|
Selective editing.
He has to be shown due process before he can be removed. CNN got a restraining order on the White House under the 5th Amendment.
The judge punted on the First Amendment but stated it's likely the WH would lose.
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 12:55 PM
|
#187
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,962
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
Selective editing.
|
The order is temporary. That is fact, not selective editing.
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 12:55 PM
|
#188
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,002
|
Stick him in the back row and put him on ignore and watch his head explode. 
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 01:00 PM
|
#189
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyfox
The order is temporary. That is fact, not selective editing.
|
It's over unless the White House wants to continue litigating it and force a decision. CNN is the Plaintiff.
And per Sarah's quote from above... it seems they're finished too.
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 01:02 PM
|
#190
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,655
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elysiantraveller
It's over unless the White House wants to continue litigating it and force a decision. CNN is the Plaintiff.
And per Sarah's quote from above... it seems they're finished too.
|
so CNN is going to drop their lawsuit?
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 01:04 PM
|
#191
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,962
|
The order is temporary. The Daily Mail had it right.
Besides, can you imagine the consequences if the judge had said a reporter's pass was permanent? ??
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 01:08 PM
|
#192
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyfox
The order is temporary. The Daily Mail had it right.
Besides, can you imagine the consequences if the judge had said a reporter's pass was permanent? ??
|
The judge never said that.
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 01:11 PM
|
#193
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 14,036
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
so CNN is going to drop their lawsuit?
|
I would assume after already losing this decision the WH will be pretty willing to settle
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 01:11 PM
|
#194
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 11,474
|
Well shit.
Now what am I supposed to do?
Riot? Burn some stuff in public? Yell at the sky? Cry?
|
|
|
|
|
11-16-2018, 01:23 PM
|
#195
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 17,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyfox
Besides, can you imagine the consequences if the judge had said a reporter's pass was permanent? ??
|
The D.C. Circuit Court ruled on this in a previous case. See Post #121 in this thread. From the order:
Quote:
|
Given these important first amendment rights implicated by refusal to grant White House press passes to bona fide Washington journalists, such refusal must be based on a compelling governmental interest.
|
__________________
A man's got to know his limitations. -- Dirty Harry
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
