Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


View Poll Results: Meet Sheet Factors
ITM% 5 41.67%
WIN% 6 50.00%
Total Earnings 0 0%
Earnings Per Start (@Meet) 2 16.67%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 12. Non-members may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 05-23-2018, 01:56 PM   #1
Foolshope
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 0 Foolshope is on a distinguished road
Question New to the Forum, Meet Index Question

Hey everyone!

This is my first post after sitting on a 2 week waiting list from the moderators.
The Turf really is greener on the other side...

I've been handicapping since 2014, mainly an Exotic better with preference toward Pen & Paper methods - although I use digital data just as much without software (typically Excel until I find an angle I like, then do it by hand)

Here's my question:

I have never really found much consistency for handicapping from Meet related sheets, but I was wondering if you guys are looking at Jockeys/Trainers at a Meet - how do you Priority filter them?
(which factor over another)

ITM%? Win%?
Total Earnings?
EPS? (@ the Meet)

I haven't spent the time to analyze the data over a long time to determine if its even worth it to highlight certain Jockeys or Trainers on my PPs in relation to Meet (separate from - career/90 days/year/all tracks/etc).

It does not have to pertain to a WINNING factor, but more for Exotic betting.

Also, if this data doesn't provide usefulness - you can state just that.
Thanks!
Foolshope is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-23-2018, 03:41 PM   #2
Dave Schwartz
 
Dave Schwartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 13,876
Rep Power: 34 Dave Schwartz is just really niceDave Schwartz is just really niceDave Schwartz is just really niceDave Schwartz is just really nice
You needed another option: "None of the above."

That would be my choice.
Dave Schwartz is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-23-2018, 04:14 PM   #3
Parkview_Pirate
Registered User
 
Parkview_Pirate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,450
Rep Power: 5 Parkview_Pirate will become famous soon enough
The factors you have listed are fairly basic, and would be reflected in the morning line(sometimes).

Any time there's a hot jockey/trainer combo, or "jockey on for this trainer really trying" it's well known.

Many handicappers look at jockey strengths and weaknesses, but that's also reflected to a lesser degree in Bris and DRF stats - again, commonly known.

Many handicappers look at trainer patterns, which are usually only presented in high-level numbers, but more advanced tools like Formulator let you drill down deeper, and get specific stats for a particular race/horse/setup. Less commonly known, especially those for rounding out the exotics vs. winning.

Some connections "point" to the boutique meets like Saratoga, Keeneland and Del Mar, while others avoid those or do poorly, saving their ammo for easier pickings.

There is good reason to review meet statistics, mostly on the wagering side, which eliminates many of them for me. But some venues that race year round or for many months would require separating their "meets" up to get any more useful data.

Meanwhile, I'll be bold and say that kind of homework can be more usefully spent taking extensive trip notes and using physical appearance - which are not as commonly used, and vary wildly between 'cappers.
Parkview_Pirate is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-23-2018, 04:17 PM   #4
Tom
Registered User
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 84,771
Rep Power: 109 Tom is a splendid one to beholdTom is a splendid one to beholdTom is a splendid one to beholdTom is a splendid one to beholdTom is a splendid one to beholdTom is a splendid one to beholdTom is a splendid one to behold
Talking about a specific meet, I choose Win%, as in trainers who do so-so at other times while pointing towards a specific meet to unleash their good stock.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-23-2018, 06:09 PM   #5
Foolshope
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 0 Foolshope is on a distinguished road
Thank you for the input guys, I also received some Private Messages with good feedback as well. All of it is much appreciated!
Foolshope is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 05-23-2018, 11:17 PM   #6
JustRalph
Disgruntled Horseplayer
 
JustRalph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 40,870
Rep Power: 62 JustRalph is a name known to allJustRalph is a name known to allJustRalph is a name known to allJustRalph is a name known to allJustRalph is a name known to allJustRalph is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz View Post
You needed another option: "None of the above."

That would be my choice.
Nice
__________________
SHUT UP AND BET!
JustRalph is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
How many U.S. tracks will be running full (8+ week) meetings in 2028?
0: We'll all be nuked by then - 5.66%
3 Votes
1-5 - 9.43%
5 Votes
6-10 - 18.87%
10 Votes
11-15 - 18.87%
10 Votes
16-20 - 9.43%
5 Votes
21 or more - 37.74%
20 Votes
Total Votes: 53
Non-members may not vote on this poll.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2018 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved -- Best Viewed in a modern browser @ 1280x720 Resolution Or Higher
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.