Roe vs Wade struck down……..

[PaceAdvantage]

SEETHING!

Twitter

__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!

[zico20]

Originally Posted by mostpost

It’s poorly thought out because it’s poorly thought out. He ignores the ninth Amendment which establishes that there are such things as unenumerated rights. He claims there is no right to an abortion because such a right was only granted fifty years ago, ignoring numerous other rights that didn’t exist until that did. Rights such as women’s suffrage. He says abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution therefore it cannot be a Constitutional right. Again I point you to the ninth amendment. And, I point out that the late 18th Century was not exactly a bastion of women’s rights.

The original ruling was flawed mightily. The Constitution doesn't mention the right to privacy which is what they based it on. What he claims is their is no constitutional right to an abortion. Which is exactly correct! The states should decide the issue.

[OntheRail]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Oh fuck...that was Mickey Rourke?

That's who I thought it was... then thought naw can't be. What the fuck indeed.

[boxcar]

With 63 Potential Leakers, Calls Grow to ‘Figure Out Who Is Responsible’ for SCOTUS Leak

https://www.theepochtimes.com/63-pot...RyIRpmxFnQI%3D

Should be easy to know where to start the digging in order to whittle down that 63 number.

[MargieRose]

Originally Posted by Rex Phinney

Why do I have to pick one or the other?

Does it make you feel better if I say that I don't want my taxpayer money going to pay for illegals either?

I never said anything about "expendable people" so quit twisting my comments into advocating killing off 75 year olds. I never said anything remotely close to that.

"Death of Convenience" isn't how I see it all, I view it as society stopping short of forcing people into parenthood who ARE TELLING YOU they aren't interested. We all seem to agree that societal degradation is a problem, who then would believe that spawning children to people who are willing to admit in advance they don't want them is a good idea??? That's sending you further down the rabbit hole.

In most states, all women have abortion rights until about 15 weeks or so that will likely remain intact. No one is forcing them into a full-term pregnancy. Why is anything more than 15 weeks needed to fix a screwup?

BTW, I didn't accuse you of anything nor did I state that you have to pick one or the other. Personally, I don't want my tax money going to what I consider to be immoral and/or on-the-books illegal behavior, either. But, indifference toward current behavior will only lead to worse behavior and more absurd laws down the road...my point.

The SCOTUS is not nullifying or banning anything. It may only be turning the whole issue back to individual states to deal with, as per the Constitution. These screaming memes are nuts! Bottom line: the lefties pushed too far! Now, I'm TELLING THEM...tough bananas!

[JustRalph]

Originally Posted by Rex Phinney

Given that this is all happening in an election year when the Republicans where set to slaughter the Dems just makes it more disappointing.



WTF is Republican leadership doing? Jesus Christ all you had to do was sit there and not say a word, just let Joe run his side into the ground for another 6 months, trot out a few campaign signs and plan the victory party.


God damnit, what a bunch of stupid Motherf*ckers.

This is a court case litigated over several years in the State of Mississippii if my memory is right.

National level Repubs didn’t initiate this

The Court is mostly unattached from daily politics …..they rule on what comes before them……

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by MargieRose

https://www.lifenews.com/2022/03/24/...s-after-birth/

Failed Fact Checks

ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, NPR, PBS all refused to cover abortionists who kept 2,246 aborted babies. – Mostly False
U.S. Representative Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona voted to “allow abortions up to birth.” – False
Before the Oregon state legislature, a bill is “designed to allow for the starving of patients with dementia or mental illness” to death. – False
Says Nancy Pelosi was “caught trying to include abortion funding in bill to combat coronavirus.” – False
Says Nancy Pelosi tried “once again” to include abortion funding in the latest coronavirus bill. – Mostly False
New Mexico House Committee Passes Bill to Legalize Killing Babies in Abortions Up to Birth – False
The above is from the website MediaBias Fact Check. They rate Life News as Extreme Right/ low factual reporting. In

[JustRalph]

Originally Posted by mostpost

It’s poorly thought out because it’s poorly thought out. He ignores the ninth Amendment which establishes that there are such things as unenumerated rights. He claims there is no right to an abortion because such a right was only granted fifty years ago, ignoring numerous other rights that didn’t exist until that did. Rights such as women’s suffrage. He says abortion is not mentioned in the Constitution therefore it cannot be a Constitutional right. Again I point you to the ninth amendment. And, I point out that the late 18th Century was not exactly a bastion of women’s rights.

5 Justices disagree with you.

I’ll go with the justices in spite of your vast legal experience

[OntheRail]

Originally Posted by mostpost

Very Simple. The first amendment. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of a religion.” What the Catholic Church thinks in this matter has no bearing.
I’ve stated this before. I am personally opposed to abortion, but my opinion has no bearing on the rights of others.
The only person whose opinion should matter is the women herself.

Okay how many hearts does a women have?

See when it's was just a cluster of cells okay... but the crazies kept pushing the limits.

This will only place it back on the States... so in California, Washington and other Liberal Shitholes... States will not get between the knife and neck. Other States will wheel it back to cluster of cells. So not a ban but a reset to rational humane levels.

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by zico20

The original ruling was flawed mightily. The Constitution doesn't mention the right to privacy which is what they based it on. What he claims is their is no constitutional right to an abortion. Which is exactly correct! The states should decide the issue.

Stop with the originalist intent stupidity.
Ninth Amendment: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

fourteenth Amendment No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.


That and myriad court cases have absolutely established the right to privacy in all its aspects.

[PaceAdvantage]

Can I just say...Elizabeth Warren looks great for 72...look at her neck...that doesn't look like the neck of a 72yo woman...how does she do it?

It doesn't look like she's full of plastic surgery either.

Must be that Native American Indian blood, no?

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by mostpost

Failed Fact Checks

ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, NPR, PBS all refused to cover abortionists who kept 2,246 aborted babies. – Mostly False
U.S. Representative Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona voted to “allow abortions up to birth.” – False
Before the Oregon state legislature, a bill is “designed to allow for the starving of patients with dementia or mental illness” to death. – False
Says Nancy Pelosi was “caught trying to include abortion funding in bill to combat coronavirus.” – False
Says Nancy Pelosi tried “once again” to include abortion funding in the latest coronavirus bill. – Mostly False
New Mexico House Committee Passes Bill to Legalize Killing Babies in Abortions Up to Birth – False
The above is from the website MediaBias Fact Check. They rate Life News as Extreme Right/ low factual reporting. In

Apparently my edit failed.

I meant to add that even a casual reading of AB 2223 disproves LifeNews interpretation. LN takes a single word Perinatal, which occurs only once in the legislation and uses it to paint a completely false narrative.

[PaceAdvantage]

Maybe Hillary can define what a woman is? All these "attacks on women" are so utterly confusing because I was told by our latest Supreme Court justice that it's almost impossible to define what a woman is...

Any help?

Twitter

Who is Hillary talking about????????????????

__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!

[jocko699]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Maybe Hillary can define what a woman is? All these "attacks on women" are so utterly confusing because I was told by our latest Supreme Court justice that it's almost impossible to define what a woman is...

Any help?

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/s...13156685090817

Who is Hillary talking about????????????????

The dress?

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by JustRalph

5 Justices disagree with you.

I’ll go with the justices in spite of your vast legal experience

4 justices agree with me. And that’s just on this Court. Seven Justices in Roe v Wade also agree as do five in Casey v Planned Parenthood. In fact, this may be the only Court in the history of this nation that would have made this ruling.