Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 2.33 average.
Old 07-18-2021, 09:29 PM   #9556
xtb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Western NY
Posts: 5,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
BANG

Watch him squirm
The box he thinks in is very small.
xtb is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-18-2021, 09:58 PM   #9557
Jeff P
Registered User
 
Jeff P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: JCapper Platinum: Kind of like Deep Blue... but for horses.
Posts: 5,291
The following article was picked up by both Nature and The Lancet.

It contains a review of several dozen studies showing Ivermectin to be effective against Covid-19.

In addition to the studies, the article contains a schematic drawing and explains how Ivermectin is effective against Cytokine Storm by inhibiting and disrupting binding of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein to ACE-2 receptors.

The mechanisms of action of Ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2: An evidence-based clinical review article:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41429-021-00430-5.pdf

Quote:
Asiya Kamber Zaidi 1,2 ● Puya Dehgani-Mobaraki 3

Received: 11 May 2021 / Revised: 17 May 2021 / Accepted: 20 May 2021
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the Japan Antibiotics Research Association 2021
Quote:
As per data available on 16 May 2021, 100% of 36 early treatment and prophylaxis studies report positive effects (96% of all 55 studies). Of these, 26 studies show statistically significant improvements in isolation. Random effects meta-analysis with pooled effects using the most serious outcome reported 79% and 85% improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis respectively (RR 0.21[0.11–0.37] and 0.15 [0.09–0.25]). The results were similar after exclusion based sensitivity analysis: 81% and 87%(RR 0.19 [0.14–0.26] and 0.13 [0.07–0.25]), and after restriction to 29 peer-reviewed studies: 82% and 88% (RR0.18 [0.11–0.31] and 0.12 [0.05–0.30]). Statistically significant improvements were seen for mortality, ventilation, hospitalization, cases, and viral clearance. 100% of the 17 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) for early treatment and prophylaxis report positive effects, with an estimated improvement of 73% and 83% respectively (RR 0.27[0.18–0.41] and 0.17 [0.05–0.61]), and 93% of all 28 RCTs. These studies are tabulated in Table1. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive for the 55 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 23 trillion (p=0.000000000000043). The consistency of positive results across a wide variety of cases has been remarkable. It is extremely unlikely that the observed results could have occurred by chance [8].

Quote:
Fig. 1A schematic of the key cellular and biomolecular interactions between Ivermectin, host cell, and SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 pathogenesis and prevention of complications. Ivermectin; IVM(red block) inhibits and disrupts binding of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein at the ACE-2 receptors (green).

I don't know.

Give the article a read and tell me where the authors got it wrong.



-jp

.
__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com

Last edited by Jeff P; 07-18-2021 at 10:10 PM.
Jeff P is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-18-2021, 10:12 PM   #9558
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,297
yes that is what the orange one received
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."

Last edited by 46zilzal; 07-18-2021 at 10:16 PM.
46zilzal is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-18-2021, 10:13 PM   #9559
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by xtb View Post
Yes Sherlock, the underlying diseases are very different but the drug does not care what triggers the cytokine response.
Pathology and treatment NEVER have worked that way..The PATHOLOGTICAL physiological process is what is treated NOT a
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."

Last edited by 46zilzal; 07-18-2021 at 10:15 PM.
46zilzal is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-18-2021, 10:14 PM   #9560
ReplayRandall
Buckle Up
 
ReplayRandall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff P View Post
I don't know.

Give the article a read and tell me where the authors got it wrong.
Expecting a Dr. Tim attack? When he does, ask him this question: Tim, what does Jan 4, 1934 mean to you?
ReplayRandall is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-18-2021, 10:33 PM   #9561
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,297
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457938/

a wide variety of meds have "theoretical' treatment aid...VERY FEW long term studies to prove any of them as top choice
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
46zilzal is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-19-2021, 06:48 AM   #9562
tucker6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46zilzal View Post
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457938/

a wide variety of meds have "theoretical' treatment aid...VERY FEW long term studies to prove any of them as top choice
How does one perform a long term study on drug efficacy in the middle of the crisis. As we all know, if you see this drug working and that other drug not, that's good enough in a crisis. Wouldn't you agree?
tucker6 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-19-2021, 08:43 AM   #9563
xtb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Western NY
Posts: 5,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46zilzal View Post
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7457938/

a wide variety of meds have "theoretical' treatment aid...VERY FEW long term studies to prove any of them as top choice
Please tell us what the current “top choice” med is for treating (not vaccinating against) covid, taking into consideration safety, availablity, cost and effectiveness.
xtb is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-19-2021, 09:18 AM   #9564
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by xtb View Post
Please tell us what the current “top choice” med is for treating (not vaccinating against) covid, taking into consideration safety, availablity, cost and effectiveness.

I have NEVER been an infectious disease specialist, and retired from practice LONG ago. The way therapeutics changes so rapidly LOOK IT UP YOURSELF
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
46zilzal is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-19-2021, 09:38 AM   #9565
xtb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Western NY
Posts: 5,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46zilzal View Post
I have NEVER been an infectious disease specialist, and retired from practice LONG ago. The way therapeutics changes so rapidly LOOK IT UP YOURSELF
We do and keep telling you but your TDS prevents you from accepting it. Get some help.
xtb is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-19-2021, 09:47 AM   #9566
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by xtb View Post
We do and keep telling you but your TDS prevents you from accepting it. Get some help.
The MULTIPLE articles, written for the prestigious NIH (National Institutes of Health) were written by infectious disease specialists who are also on the"cutting edge" of modern day therapeutics.

I trust THEIR judgement

What is a TDS?
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
46zilzal is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-19-2021, 10:09 AM   #9567
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,655
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46zilzal View Post
The MULTIPLE articles, written for the prestigious NIH (National Institutes of Health) were written by infectious disease specialists who are also on the"cutting edge" of modern day therapeutics.

I trust THEIR judgement

What is a TDS?
funny, I do not trust everything from Fauci and his NIH
davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-19-2021, 10:28 AM   #9568
xtb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Western NY
Posts: 5,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46zilzal View Post
The MULTIPLE articles, written for the prestigious NIH (National Institutes of Health) were written by infectious disease specialists who are also on the"cutting edge" of modern day therapeutics.

I trust THEIR judgement

What is a TDS?
You keep a close eye on off-topic, if you are serious and don't know what it means then your mind is really shot.
xtb is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-19-2021, 11:15 AM   #9569
tucker6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 10,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46zilzal View Post
The MULTIPLE articles, written for the prestigious NIH (National Institutes of Health) were written by infectious disease specialists who are also on the"cutting edge" of modern day therapeutics.

I trust THEIR judgement

What is a TDS?
What does an infectious disease expert know about treatment regimens for various ailments? Their "expertise' is limited to understanding the pathogens themselves. Once that is done, they hand that information off to other specialists who devise treatments regimens. You disagree?
tucker6 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-19-2021, 01:08 PM   #9570
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,297
Quote:
Originally Posted by tucker6 View Post
What does an infectious disease expert know about treatment regimens for various ailments? Their "expertise' is limited to understanding the pathogens themselves. Once that is done, they hand that information off to other specialists who devise treatments regimens. You disagree?
When it is about a VIRAL pandemic....Their expertise is NOT limited to the bugs themselves but to their disposition in populations, how they spread, what autopsy findings are discovered,

It is NOT that compartmentalized, never has been
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
46zilzal is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.