Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 10-04-2017, 02:53 PM   #1
pandy
Registered User
 
pandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA.
Posts: 7,464
Finger Lakes 20.4 First Quarter

I just bet on a two year old filly, Willie U, in a $15,000 maiden claiming race at Finger Lakes and she went :20.4 to the first quarter under pressure and won. That seems odd. Does anyone follow Finger Lakes closely? Did you ever see a first quarter that fast?
pandy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-04-2017, 03:05 PM   #2
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by pandy View Post
I just bet on a two year old filly, Willie U, in a $15,000 maiden claiming race at Finger Lakes and she went :20.4 to the first quarter under pressure and won. That seems odd. Does anyone follow Finger Lakes closely? Did you ever see a first quarter that fast?
We probably get one or two a year here in Southern California.

Remember, running starts and all of that. The quarterhorse First Moonflash went 440 yards in 20.27 from a standing start! That's blazing.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-04-2017, 03:27 PM   #3
122425
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: rochester,new york
Posts: 290
Times in 5ths: :23 :47 1:011 1:09
122425 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-04-2017, 03:30 PM   #4
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by pandy View Post
I just bet on a two year old filly, Willie U, in a $15,000 maiden claiming race at Finger Lakes and she went :20.4 to the first quarter under pressure and won. That seems odd. Does anyone follow Finger Lakes closely? Did you ever see a first quarter that fast?
That has to be a mistake. Belmont also had a sub 21 opening 1/4 posted earlier today which was later corrected.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-04-2017, 03:33 PM   #5
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
That has to be a mistake. Belmont also had a sub 21 opening 1/4 posted earlier today which was later corrected.
It was corrected, but the 1:09 final time looks very fishy. There is generously 0% chance that is correct, probably less.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-04-2017, 03:35 PM   #6
pandy
Registered User
 
pandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA.
Posts: 7,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
It was corrected, but the 1:09 final time looks very fishy. There is generously 0% chance that is correct, probably less.
Thanks CJ. I figured it was a mistake. When I saw the 20.4 I figured the filly would collapse but she drew off in the stretch and I knew it was too good to be true.
pandy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-04-2017, 03:38 PM   #7
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by pandy View Post
Thanks CJ. I figured it was a mistake. When I saw the 20.4 I figured the filly would collapse but she drew off in the stretch and I knew it was too good to be true.
You do get an award for cleverest redboard of an odds on favorite!



(just teasing, as I'm sure Bob knows)
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-04-2017, 03:45 PM   #8
pandy
Registered User
 
pandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA.
Posts: 7,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
You do get an award for cleverest redboard of an odds on favorite!



(just teasing, as I'm sure Bob knows)
pandy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-04-2017, 05:21 PM   #9
outofthebox
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 647
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
It was corrected, but the 1:09 final time looks very fishy. There is generously 0% chance that is correct, probably less.
I had a filly break her maiden up at FL that ran 1:09. She was appropriately named Sluggish..
outofthebox is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-04-2017, 05:24 PM   #10
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by outofthebox View Post
I had a filly break her maiden up at FL that ran 1:09. She was appropriately named Sluggish..
Certainly it is possible over this track, just don't think it was possible for this group, particularly with the adjusted opening quarter of 23+.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-04-2017, 05:28 PM   #11
outofthebox
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 647
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
Certainly it is possible over this track, just don't think it was possible for this group, particularly with the adjusted opening quarter of 23+.
My win was the slowest i've ever seen there. It was in the slop. She got a 22 "Beyer" for her effort.
outofthebox is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-04-2017, 05:58 PM   #12
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by outofthebox View Post
My win was the slowest i've ever seen there. It was in the slop. She got a 22 "Beyer" for her effort.

Oh crap, I just realized that was a 5.5 race...egg on my face. Never occured to me the horses could be that slow.

Last edited by cj; 10-04-2017 at 06:01 PM.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-04-2017, 07:20 PM   #13
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,867
Quote:
Originally Posted by outofthebox View Post
I had a filly break her maiden up at FL that ran 1:09. She was appropriately named Sluggish..
1.09.......5.5 furlongs?

A 22 Beyer is sure not the slowest ever at the thumb.
I used to see Beyer Bagels more than a few times.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-04-2017, 08:33 PM   #14
BIGTKLO
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 147
When I have to announce 1:09 for 5.5 furlongs I like to add that's quick for 6 furlongs but slowwww for 5.5 furlongs. I used to do it a lot until an owner Cecil Fiske, who since has passed away. gave me grief about it when one of his fillies got the call. The poor guy had to be ready to mute that part of the call when showing the replay to his friends. It wasn't the first time I have been muted and I know it won't be the last.
BIGTKLO is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-04-2017, 08:39 PM   #15
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,867
Good one Tony!
Love a smart remark or two in a race call.

I remember once, back in the mid 80's, the track was in terrible shape - the inside 7-8 paths were a bog. Turning for home, all the rider would swing wide. One race, one horse came out so wide he was on the outside rail. Ross Morton comment, "So and So sneaks through on the golden rail!"
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.