|
|
10-04-2017, 02:53 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA.
Posts: 7,464
|
Finger Lakes 20.4 First Quarter
I just bet on a two year old filly, Willie U, in a $15,000 maiden claiming race at Finger Lakes and she went :20.4 to the first quarter under pressure and won. That seems odd. Does anyone follow Finger Lakes closely? Did you ever see a first quarter that fast?
|
|
|
10-04-2017, 03:05 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pandy
I just bet on a two year old filly, Willie U, in a $15,000 maiden claiming race at Finger Lakes and she went :20.4 to the first quarter under pressure and won. That seems odd. Does anyone follow Finger Lakes closely? Did you ever see a first quarter that fast?
|
We probably get one or two a year here in Southern California.
Remember, running starts and all of that. The quarterhorse First Moonflash went 440 yards in 20.27 from a standing start! That's blazing.
|
|
|
10-04-2017, 03:27 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: rochester,new york
Posts: 290
|
Times in 5ths: :23 :47 1:011 1:09
|
|
|
10-04-2017, 03:30 PM
|
#4
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pandy
I just bet on a two year old filly, Willie U, in a $15,000 maiden claiming race at Finger Lakes and she went :20.4 to the first quarter under pressure and won. That seems odd. Does anyone follow Finger Lakes closely? Did you ever see a first quarter that fast?
|
That has to be a mistake. Belmont also had a sub 21 opening 1/4 posted earlier today which was later corrected.
|
|
|
10-04-2017, 03:33 PM
|
#5
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
That has to be a mistake. Belmont also had a sub 21 opening 1/4 posted earlier today which was later corrected.
|
It was corrected, but the 1:09 final time looks very fishy. There is generously 0% chance that is correct, probably less.
|
|
|
10-04-2017, 03:35 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA.
Posts: 7,464
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
It was corrected, but the 1:09 final time looks very fishy. There is generously 0% chance that is correct, probably less.
|
Thanks CJ. I figured it was a mistake. When I saw the 20.4 I figured the filly would collapse but she drew off in the stretch and I knew it was too good to be true.
|
|
|
10-04-2017, 03:38 PM
|
#7
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pandy
Thanks CJ. I figured it was a mistake. When I saw the 20.4 I figured the filly would collapse but she drew off in the stretch and I knew it was too good to be true.
|
You do get an award for cleverest redboard of an odds on favorite!
(just teasing, as I'm sure Bob knows)
|
|
|
10-04-2017, 03:45 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA.
Posts: 7,464
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
You do get an award for cleverest redboard of an odds on favorite!
(just teasing, as I'm sure Bob knows)
|
|
|
|
10-04-2017, 05:21 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 647
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
It was corrected, but the 1:09 final time looks very fishy. There is generously 0% chance that is correct, probably less.
|
I had a filly break her maiden up at FL that ran 1:09. She was appropriately named Sluggish..
|
|
|
10-04-2017, 05:24 PM
|
#10
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by outofthebox
I had a filly break her maiden up at FL that ran 1:09. She was appropriately named Sluggish..
|
Certainly it is possible over this track, just don't think it was possible for this group, particularly with the adjusted opening quarter of 23+.
|
|
|
10-04-2017, 05:28 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 647
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
Certainly it is possible over this track, just don't think it was possible for this group, particularly with the adjusted opening quarter of 23+.
|
My win was the slowest i've ever seen there. It was in the slop. She got a 22 "Beyer" for her effort.
|
|
|
10-04-2017, 05:58 PM
|
#12
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by outofthebox
My win was the slowest i've ever seen there. It was in the slop. She got a 22 "Beyer" for her effort.
|
Oh crap, I just realized that was a 5.5 race...egg on my face. Never occured to me the horses could be that slow.
Last edited by cj; 10-04-2017 at 06:01 PM.
|
|
|
10-04-2017, 07:20 PM
|
#13
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,867
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by outofthebox
I had a filly break her maiden up at FL that ran 1:09. She was appropriately named Sluggish..
|
1.09.......5.5 furlongs?
A 22 Beyer is sure not the slowest ever at the thumb.
I used to see Beyer Bagels more than a few times.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
10-04-2017, 08:33 PM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 147
|
When I have to announce 1:09 for 5.5 furlongs I like to add that's quick for 6 furlongs but slowwww for 5.5 furlongs. I used to do it a lot until an owner Cecil Fiske, who since has passed away. gave me grief about it when one of his fillies got the call. The poor guy had to be ready to mute that part of the call when showing the replay to his friends. It wasn't the first time I have been muted and I know it won't be the last.
|
|
|
10-04-2017, 08:39 PM
|
#15
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,867
|
Good one Tony!
Love a smart remark or two in a race call.
I remember once, back in the mid 80's, the track was in terrible shape - the inside 7-8 paths were a bog. Turning for home, all the rider would swing wide. One race, one horse came out so wide he was on the outside rail. Ross Morton comment, "So and So sneaks through on the golden rail!"
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|