Hogg vs Ingram

[horses4courses]

Originally Posted by FantasticDan

The sum of his "charges" are thus:

https://twitter.com/davidhogg111/sta...20811123761158

Which doesn't seem like an out of line question for a gun control activist to ask of a politician who's received $8M from the NRA in the last 10 years.

Don't forget, Dan
He's a punk assed kid who unfairly attacks conservatives.......

[Clocker]

Originally Posted by FantasticDan

Which doesn't seem like an out of line question for a gun control activist to ask of a politician who's received $8M from the NRA in the last 10 years.

It is out of line to suggest that Rubio was responsible for student deaths, which he implied. To then turn on McCain certainly hints at the same thing. Linking politicians and the NRA in the context of an emotional rant about a school shooting certainly implies some responsibility on the part of the politicians.

Those are cheap shots that will do nothing to address the problem and show a very tenuous grasp of reality.

Why would the NRA not contribute to politicians that agree with their views? Why would a politician not accept donations from an organization that supported his views? How would Rubio or McCain turning down such donations make the world a better place where we could all live happily ever after?

[Clocker]

Originally Posted by tucker6

More than 80% of all gun crimes are committed with an illegally obtained weapon. Last I checked, the NRA is in support of lawful ownership of guns. You and Hogg seem to be in need of a scapegoat for the left's soft on crime position. The NRA is not the problem with gun crimes in America.

And virtually all mass shootings are committed by people with serious mental problems. But it is the liberals who fight against the use of mental health information as part of a background check.

Because that might stigmatize somebody, or hurt their feelings.

Republican Senator Charles Grassley’s bill to increase funding to the FBI’s NICS background check system so that the system had more accurate criminal and mental health data was blocked by Senate Democrats. It had 53 votes for it and 47 votes against it, falling short of the 60 vote majority needed because liberal Senators voted against it.

https://bearingarms.com/bob-o/2016/0...ch-list-bills/

[barahona44]

Originally Posted by Clocker

And virtually all mass shootings are committed by people with serious mental problems. But it is the liberals who fight against the use of mental health information as part of a background check.
[Because that might stigmatize somebody, or hurt their feelings.

https://bearingarms.com/bob-o/2016/0...ch-list-bills/

Where did you draw that conlusion that hurting someone 's feelings and stigmatizing people with mental illness was the reason Democrats wouldn't vote for the bill? I didn't see any reason given for Democrats opposition.

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by horses4courses

Why bring up his SAT scores and prospective colleges?
She's a petty bitch catering to an appreciative audience.

No such thing as petty when dealing with the left.

We learned that when they touted how many scoops of ice cream Trump gets with dessert.

Frankly, I'm shocked this sniveling punk is demanding advertisers boycott her show. It's hilarious, actually...this kid thinks he has power.

When there are more guns in the hands of people at the end of all this (which there will be), let him cry some more crocodile tears for me.

[Clocker]

Originally Posted by barahona44

Where did you draw that conlusion that hurting someone 's feelings and stigmatizing people with mental illness was the reason Democrats wouldn't vote for the bill? I didn't see any reason given for Democrats opposition.

The part about hurt feelings is just a little sarcastic exaggeration.

The rest is not specified in that article. This is a long held position of liberals who want stricter gun controls, but oppose anything they consider to be an invasion of privacy by law enforcement.

Some of the most liberal states are some of the biggest opponents.

Some advocacy groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union, however, are wary of expanding the NICS database, contending that it could jeopardize privacy and further stigmatize the mentally ill.

https://www.boston.com/uncategorized...kground-checks

[davew]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

No such thing as petty when dealing with the left.

We learned that when they touted how many scoops of ice cream Trump gets with dessert.

Frankly, I'm shocked this sniveling punk is demanding advertisers boycott her show. It's hilarious, actually...this kid thinks he has power.

When there are more guns in the hands of people at the end of all this (which there will be), let him cry some more crocodile tears for me.

You have it wrong, he is advising his dim followers to tweet bad things to advertisers on the show, and many have.

[Tom]

And they will lose sales because of it.

Funny to watch the libs were recoil in horror over comments made about them.

Freaking snowflakes.
You're ALL a bunch of whiners!

Happy Easter, Eggheads!

[davew]

Originally Posted by horses4courses

Don't forget, Dan
He's a punk assed kid who unfairly attacks conservatives.......

Good thing he has some nice group like media matters giving him all the advertisers on Laura's show, so that he can promote an advertiser attack campaign....

[cratman]

For good or bad he does seem to have power, based on results and effect.

Our celebrity culture.

[JustRalph]

Originally Posted by delayjf

That's what gets to me, Hogg has cursed opening calling all who support the 2nd amendment F**KING child killers. Yet its Ingram who is being vilified in the press for calling Hogg a whiner.

Don’t forget NRA members are “pathetic phuckers”

He needs an ass kicking

[JustRalph]

Originally Posted by horses4courses

Why bring up his SAT scores and prospective colleges?
She's a petty bitch catering to an appreciative audience.

She’s a very accomplished woman, worth 45 million bucks. I’d say she has little to worry about

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by chrisl

Seems like you never lose a opportunity, to jump up and vilify a women. Big, Big Man aren't you.

Originally Posted by Clocker

And virtually all mass shootings are committed by people with serious mental problems. But it is the liberals who fight against the use of mental health information as part of a background check.

Because that might stigmatize somebody, or hurt their feelings.

https://bearingarms.com/bob-o/2016/0...ch-list-bills/

They blocked it because it was a watered down bill that would have had no effect on either mental health or gun control. For example, the portion regarding people on the no fly list would have required the government to prove they were a terrorist threat before they could be refused a gun.

[horses4courses]

Originally Posted by JustRalph

She’s a very accomplished woman, worth 45 million bucks. I’d say she has little to worry about

That's nice

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by horses4courses

She's a grown woman conducting a personal attack on a teenager.
Not addressing the gun control argument.

With any luck, she's out of work.

We have here a fifty four year old woman mocking a seventeen year old boy because he could not get into a college. A woman who had the power of a major American News network behind her. A seventeen year old who had just lost seventeen friends in the space. Of a few minutes. What kind of piece of garbage does that?