Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - Sports


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 01-04-2016, 11:54 PM   #1
Valuist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 16,487
NFL wildcard round

YTD: 47-34-1

Seattle/Minnesota Under 41- 41 is a key number and I only see it going down. When the Seahawks put up 38 on the Vikings earlier in the season, the Vikings had 3 key defensive players out, and all are back now. I expect Zimmer to make some adjustments. Minnesota won't be giving up anywhere near 38 this time.

Waiting on the other games. I anticipate the public to hammer Pittsburgh, Seattle and KC.
Valuist is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-04-2016, 11:57 PM   #2
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,548
My line for this weekend:

K.C. -5.5
Sea. -6
Pit. -Pk
Was. -Pk
__________________
Live to play another day.
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-05-2016, 04:56 AM   #3
Marshall Bennett
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston , Tx.
Posts: 9,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
K.C. -5.5
Where do you find that? Best I've seen anywhere is -3.5
Marshall Bennett is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-05-2016, 08:33 AM   #4
BetHorses!
Registered User
 
BetHorses!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 2,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Bennett
Where do you find that? Best I've seen anywhere is -3.5
That is his personal line
__________________
Learn the Game!!
BetHorses! is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-05-2016, 08:36 AM   #5
BetHorses!
Registered User
 
BetHorses!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 2,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valuist
YTD: 47-34-1

Seattle/Minnesota Under 41- 41 is a key number and I only see it going down. When the Seahawks put up 38 on the Vikings earlier in the season, the Vikings had 3 key defensive players out, and all are back now. I expect Zimmer to make some adjustments. Minnesota won't be giving up anywhere near 38 this time.

Waiting on the other games. I anticipate the public to hammer Pittsburgh, Seattle and KC.

Gonna be frigid there
__________________
Learn the Game!!
BetHorses! is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-05-2016, 08:51 AM   #6
rastajenk
Just Deplorable
 
rastajenk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lebanon, Ohio
Posts: 8,064
I'm surprised they didn't make it a night game.
rastajenk is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-05-2016, 12:12 PM   #7
Marshall Bennett
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston , Tx.
Posts: 9,586
Quote:
Originally Posted by BetHorses!
That is his personal line
Yeah, I see that now. Personally I think Houston will win with their defense. Their corners and safeties have really stepped it up. I gave up on this team early on. They got it together quickly.
Marshall Bennett is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-05-2016, 11:43 PM   #8
Valuist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 16,487
What do KC, Pittsburgh and Seattle have in common? All road favorites with cluster injuries at RB. The Steelers were very fortunate to have a back like DeAngelo Williams, but if he can't go, the Steelers will be much easier to defend. When Lynch went down, Rawls did great (better than Lynch was earlier in the year). Now Rawls is out; Lynch practiced but how good can a RB be who hasn't played in a game in a couple months?

Fact: If one wagered only on the team who had faced the superior schedule (per Sagarin's ratings) in the wildcard round, they'd be 37-14 ATS since 2002.

Fact: Road QBs have over 30 combined playoff starts; home QBs in this road have ZERO.
Valuist is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-06-2016, 06:41 AM   #9
BetHorses!
Registered User
 
BetHorses!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Queens, New York
Posts: 2,269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valuist
Fact: If one wagered only on the team who had faced the superior schedule (per Sagarin's ratings) in the wildcard round, they'd be 37-14 ATS since 2002.
I think this goes beyond the wildcard round

on my data the the strength of sched looks like this...maybe someone can post if Sagarin agrees.

KC > Hou

Pitt > Cin

Min > Sea

GB > Was
__________________
Learn the Game!!
BetHorses! is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-06-2016, 08:09 AM   #10
Rookies
Canadian since 51
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,458
KC
Cinci
Sea
GB
Rookies is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-06-2016, 08:31 AM   #11
rastajenk
Just Deplorable
 
rastajenk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lebanon, Ohio
Posts: 8,064
Pittsburgh and Cincinnati played the same schedule except that the Bengies won at Buffalo, and Pitt lost at NE. But Cincinnati went out west three times, and once to high-altitude Denver, while Pitt did only twice. I don't see any strength of schedule advantage to Pittsburgh between those two.
rastajenk is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-06-2016, 10:38 AM   #12
Valuist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 16,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by rastajenk
Pittsburgh and Cincinnati played the same schedule except that the Bengies won at Buffalo, and Pitt lost at NE. But Cincinnati went out west three times, and once to high-altitude Denver, while Pitt did only twice. I don't see any strength of schedule advantage to Pittsburgh between those two.
The strength of schedule is strictly based on power ratings of opponents, not the miscellaneous factors like trips across time zones, or short week games. Not saying those factors don't count, but for the purpose of this angle they don't.
Valuist is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-06-2016, 03:38 PM   #13
ReplayRandall
Buckle Up
 
ReplayRandall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
In weather that will conjure up images of Bud Grant at old Metropolitan Stadium, the Vikings and Seattle Seahawks will kick off Sunday in temperatures that will make you glad you're watching on your couch.

The coldest game in Seahawks history, according to Bob Condotta of the Seattle Times, was a 1992 game at Denver that was 13 degrees. The Seahawks have played only 20 games in freezing temperatures and are 6-14 in them.

Sunday's game will be pretty miserable. The forecast calls for a high temperature of 1 degree above zero....
ReplayRandall is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-06-2016, 04:02 PM   #14
kingfin66
Bombardier
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,039
Inteteresting thing this cold weather. Both teams will have to play in it yet people are only concerned with how Seattle will handle it? Does Minnesota practice outdoors, or do they practice inside like every other nfl team? Minnesota has some type of home field advantage I guess, but is the game even sold out?
kingfin66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-06-2016, 04:04 PM   #15
kingfin66
Bombardier
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReplayRandall
In weather that will conjure up images of Bud Grant at old Metropolitan Stadium, the Vikings and Seattle Seahawks will kick off Sunday in temperatures that will make you glad you're watching on your couch.

The coldest game in Seahawks history, according to Bob Condotta of the Seattle Times, was a 1992 game at Denver that was 13 degrees. The Seahawks have played only 20 games in freezing temperatures and are 6-14 in them.

Sunday's game will be pretty miserable. The forecast calls for a high temperature of 1 degree above zero....
Who did Seattle play in those games? Were they favored? How many of the current roster played in those games?
kingfin66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.