Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 02-05-2014, 04:29 PM   #31
Jeff P
Registered User
 
Jeff P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: JCapper Platinum: Kind of like Deep Blue... but for horses.
Posts: 5,290
Light, In the second sample the difference in win rate and roi between the set of those wearing blinkers and those not wearing blinkers is certainly smaller.

FWIW, my interpretation here runs along the following lines:

1. The second sample is restricted to starters whose odds are under 10-1.

2. The first sample contains lots of starters whose odds are greater than 10-1.

3. Therefore, the avg odds of the starters in the second sample are lower than the avg odds of the starters in the first sample.

4. It's been my experience that the lower the odds the harder it is to "move the needle." Think of "the "needle" as a gauge being used to measure win rate and roi when a sample of starters with known characteristics is broken out by some independent variable.

I'm not at all surprised the difference between blinkers false and blinkers true turned out to be smaller in the second sample than in the first sample. Why? Because the avg odds of the starters in the second sample were lower than the avg odds of the starters in the first. (It was harder to move "the needle" in the second sample than it was in the first.)


-jp

.
__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com
Jeff P is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2014, 05:14 PM   #32
cnollfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 1,366
Interpreting Jeff P's latest stats: If a FTS is higher than 10-1 and/or higher than its ML AND is wearing blinkers, its chances are particularly poor when compared to a horse in that situation without blinkers.
cnollfan is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2014, 05:43 PM   #33
Pensacola Pete
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 729
HTR users: open up three copies of Robot3. Test for the last 50 or 60 days. Now set the odds filter to 0.1 to 9.9 post time odds. Nothing else. Now run Learn All, Learn More, and Learn Tour. Look at the ROIs. Almost everything is clustered around 0.80. That's what you're up against.
Pensacola Pete is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-05-2014, 11:43 PM   #34
mnmark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 20
I once asked a decent trainer who had two 1st time starters in the race after he was leaving the paddock why one had binkers and one didnt. He said that the horse that was running without blinkers didnt need them Thats all he said. The horse without blinkers won his debut easily
mnmark is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-06-2014, 11:46 AM   #35
BlinkersOn
Registered User
 
BlinkersOn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Pocatello, Idaho
Posts: 234
I really feel like I'm getting tossed around a lot in this thread. I'm getting dizzy.
BlinkersOn is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-06-2014, 04:11 PM   #36
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
There's also different kinds of blinkers, horses can essentially NOT be getting a blinker change when in reality, they are.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.