Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 5.00 average.
Old 11-04-2014, 04:11 PM   #166
horses4courses
Registered User
 
horses4courses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scanman
The objection should have been on both Bayern and Toast of New York. If he wins the objection, he's placed 2nd, a difference of $600k.
Now, there's a fairytale ending for all California Chrome devotees.
The operative word being "fairytale".
horses4courses is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-04-2014, 04:49 PM   #167
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
Pandy...you hit the nail right on the head with the article of yours that you presented yesterday. This is "politics"...and nothing else. The stewards' hands were tied...and Garcia could have taken a gun out at the break and nothing would happen. As I've been saying the last couple of days, there was nothing surprising about the non-disqualification. We ALL knew that Bayern wasn't coming down. What WAS surprising was the bullshit excuse which accompanied the non-DQ. "The foul only affected Shared Belief...and it didn't cost SB a placing"...the story went. NONSENSE! The entire RACE was impacted by what Bayern's did. NOTHING would have remained the same if Bayern behaved normally at the start of that race.

If there is an "unwritten law" in California stating that infractions at the gate are non-punishable by disqualification, then put that law in the books, for heaven's sake...and end these types of controversies once and for all. That way, we can be spared of all the bullshit excuses from these lame stewards.
There's a written rule that fouls only result in DQ's when they occur at a point in the race whete the stewards conclude that they cost a horse a placing. Thus, the "most fouls at the gate don't result in DQ's" rule IS written.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-04-2014, 07:33 PM   #168
pandy
Registered User
 
pandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA.
Posts: 7,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
Pandy...you hit the nail right on the head with the article of yours that you presented yesterday. This is "politics"...and nothing else. The stewards' hands were tied...and Garcia could have taken a gun out at the break and nothing would happen. As I've been saying the last couple of days, there was nothing surprising about the non-disqualification. We ALL knew that Bayern wasn't coming down. What WAS surprising was the bullshit excuse which accompanied the non-DQ. "The foul only affected Shared Belief...and it didn't cost SB a placing"...the story went. NONSENSE! The entire RACE was impacted by what Bayern's did. NOTHING would have remained the same if Bayern behaved normally at the start of that race.

If there is an "unwritten law" in California stating that infractions at the gate are non-punishable by disqualification, then put that law in the books, for heaven's sake...and end these types of controversies once and for all. That way, we can be spared of all the bullshit excuses from these lame stewards.

Thanks. Can you imagine what would have happened if Baffert trained Shared Belief instead of Bayern? Baffert would have been livid and I guarantee you that he would try to take some sort of legal action.
pandy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-04-2014, 07:36 PM   #169
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by pandy
Thanks. Can you imagine what would have happened if Baffert trained Shared Belief instead of Bayern? Baffert would have been livid and I guarantee you that he would try to take some sort of legal action.
Or if Jerry Jam owned SB.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-04-2014, 07:54 PM   #170
Mr_Ed
Registered User
 
Mr_Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
Or if Jerry Jam owned SB.
Or if John McEnroe owned SB?
Mr_Ed is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-04-2014, 07:55 PM   #171
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Ed
Or if John McEnroe owned SB?
you can't be serious?
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-04-2014, 07:57 PM   #172
Mr_Ed
Registered User
 
Mr_Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 457
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
you can't be serious?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekQ_Ja02gTY

Mr_Ed is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-04-2014, 07:58 PM   #173
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Trainer Peter Miller now saying if it was him, the horse comes down and there was bias towards Baffert.

Stein and Hardoon were telling Chaney that people feel there was a bias towards Baffert and that Bob has more power than the stewards, of course, it was made tongue in cheek with a few giggles after it was said, but really, it SEEMS true.

Chaney said that Baffert gets no favors from them, but i have to ask, did he get a huge favor when his horse death investigation yielded no suspension, fine or anything? Is that not a HUGE favor to essentially say "gee, we dont know what happened, Bob is in the clear"
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-04-2014, 07:58 PM   #174
pandy
Registered User
 
pandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA.
Posts: 7,464
The fact that stewards allow rough riding in major races is dangerous. Did Joe Bravo ever get suspended for his ride on Danza in this year's Derby? There wasn't even an inquiry but if you watch the replay, Bravo was trapped so he bulled his way out and slammed into Medal Count (the chartcaller has it in the chart). Bravo could have caused a major accident, but, he obviously felt it was worth the risk because he knows that they never take a horse down in the Derby.
pandy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-04-2014, 08:00 PM   #175
pandy
Registered User
 
pandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA.
Posts: 7,464
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
Trainer Peter Miller now saying if it was him, the horse comes down and there was bias towards Baffert.

Stein and Hardoon were telling Chaney that people feel there was a bias towards Baffert and that Bob has more power than the stewards, of course, it was made tongue in cheek with a few giggles after it was said, but really, it SEEMS true.

Chaney said that Baffert gets no favors from them, but i have to ask, did he get a huge favor when his horse death investigation yielded no suspension, fine or anything? Is that not a HUGE favor to essentially say "gee, we dont know what happened, Bob is in the clear"
They really went after Baffert hard when those 7 horses mysteriously died. They had a model, Bo Derek, investigate. You can't make this stuff up!
pandy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-04-2014, 08:05 PM   #176
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by pandy
The fact that stewards allow rough riding in major races is dangerous. Did Joe Bravo ever get suspended for his ride on Danza in this year's Derby? There wasn't even an inquiry but if you watch the replay, Bravo was trapped so he bulled his way out and slammed into Medal Count (the chartcaller has it in the chart). Bravo could have caused a major accident, but, he obviously felt it was worth the risk because he knows that they never take a horse down in the Derby.
Here's a Baffert horse causing obvious interference at the wire, drifting out under the left handed whip, costing placings and yet, no inquiry or objection or anything. Its right here in black and white, you don't even need to see the head on to see Baffert's horse drift out. Bafferts is the dark colored horse with the light green cap.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=is4q1L6JiSI
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-04-2014, 08:08 PM   #177
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by pandy
They really went after Baffert hard when those 7 horses mysteriously died. They had a model, Bo Derek, investigate. You can't make this stuff up!
Its incredible that he got zero days suspension and didn't have his license reviewed. Even if you somehow convince yourself he didnt do it on purpose and it was an "accident" there's still the issue of malpractice. Those horses are screaming from the grave and nobody cares. Michael Vick went to JAIL for dogfighting and this guy didn't even get a 1 day suspension or a fine for all these horses dying in his care. Not 1 day or 1 penny.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-04-2014, 10:29 PM   #178
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyfox
You're not a lawyer....I shocked....shocked I say.
But he stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night!
John McEnroe.....
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.