|
|
07-20-2023, 10:16 AM
|
#121
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Clarksville, AR
Posts: 1,222
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRalph
Probably a pretty good measuring stick. The rest
?
I still think there should be about 10 tracks tops
|
I think we should follow the Australian model - 1 track for approximately every 73,000 people. (25.69 million, ~350 tracks)
330 million population in US = ~4500 tracks
__________________
Tom in NW Arkansas
Past performances are no guarantee of future results. - Why isn't this disclaimer printed in the Daily Racing Form?
|
|
|
07-21-2023, 07:50 AM
|
#122
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 66
|
Toronto closed 5 tracks over the years. There are some nice pics in the link below for those, like myself, that like to reminisce about the good old days.
https://www.blogto.com/city/2012/04/...ke_in_toronto/
|
|
|
07-21-2023, 08:51 AM
|
#123
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,613
|
I hijacked his from the Jerry Brown thread because it's more relevant here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by crestridge
What's wrong with Hong Kong's formula: few tracks, large handle, honest management, more basis toward honesty and strict rules enforced, class ratings, free past performances, many horses in the race, large attendance at the tracks, etc. Just two, three days a week, something to research.
|
This is where I suspect we are heading in terms of size. We'll see about the rest.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
|
|
|
07-21-2023, 11:19 AM
|
#124
|
velocitician
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,297
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike_123_ca
|
that was E.P Taylor's move
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
|
|
|
07-21-2023, 12:36 PM
|
#125
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,285
|
Seems to be going over well with the No. Ca. horse community.
https://www.drf.com/news/leading-nor...on-plan-viable
__________________
Best writing advice ever received: Never use a long word when a diminutive one will suffice.
|
|
|
07-21-2023, 01:16 PM
|
#126
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 5,870
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by classhandicapper
I hijacked his from the Jerry Brown thread because it's more relevant here.
This is where I suspect we are heading in terms of size. We'll see about the rest.
|
i agree...no tobacco and a lot fewer horses in Ky...at least they have bourbon
|
|
|
07-21-2023, 05:18 PM
|
#127
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lakehurst, NJ
Posts: 1,035
|
The only hope for racing in NoCal to be revived is the installation of turf courses at all of the fair circuit tracks - and for the tracks to lengthen and juggle the dates of their meets in such a way that there is continuous racing between the Labor Day weekend and the Memorial Day weekend.
|
|
|
07-21-2023, 06:33 PM
|
#128
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,887
|
I would'tt think they will be investing much capital in a fair track.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Last edited by Tom; 07-21-2023 at 06:35 PM.
|
|
|
07-21-2023, 08:21 PM
|
#129
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,738
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas Roulston
The only hope for racing in NoCal to be revived is the installation of turf courses at all of the fair circuit tracks - and for the tracks to lengthen and juggle the dates of their meets in such a way that there is continuous racing between the Labor Day weekend and the Memorial Day weekend.
|
The fairs are in the summer.
|
|
|
07-21-2023, 11:14 PM
|
#130
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 657
|
Thomas:
Check out what CARF have planned. Your answer is not the ONLY answer. In fact, it is not even the most likely answer. I understand people's disillusion but seriously here is a chance to get behind and support something that will bring nearly year round racing to Northern California. Instead people just go online and deliver statements like the one you did when they can easily read about what is going on and say: "That is a great idea, what can I do to support it?" Or say the opposite - instead of just deciding this is the ONLY way forward.
CB
__________________
http://racecallercraig.blogspot.com
www.twitter.com/callstheraces
|
|
|
07-22-2023, 02:56 PM
|
#131
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 371
|
If that quote from one of the owners in the Norcal circuit is the majority of the opinions, then there might be hope for them. They probably won't ship their horses to Socal and figure out how to setup something that works to their benefit. Frankly the logistics and costs don't make sense. You are going to ship your horses 400 miles down south to a more competitive circuit where there isn't much benefit to you and your costs increase dramatically. They might just be better off enlarging a fair circuit and base their operations around there.
|
|
|
07-22-2023, 03:18 PM
|
#132
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by horsefan2019
If that quote from one of the owners in the Norcal circuit is the majority of the opinions, then there might be hope for them. They probably won't ship their horses to Socal and figure out how to setup something that works to their benefit. Frankly the logistics and costs don't make sense. You are going to ship your horses 400 miles down south to a more competitive circuit where there isn't much benefit to you and your costs increase dramatically. They might just be better off enlarging a fair circuit and base their operations around there.
|
I am not going to make predictions on who ships and who doesn't, but in general it's mistaken to say they can't compete down here. What would happen if they all did ship is that SoCal tracks would start carding races attractive to the shippers. So you'd see Maiden 16 races and $4k claimers and stuff. Indeed, you'd probably see races mostly filled with NorCal horses along with some people moving up from Los Al short track thoroughbred races.
If they came, some of those horses would win some races down here.
(On another note, I am highly skeptical of the expansion of the fairs to create a full NorCal circuit for another reason-- these fair meets will lose a lot of money, and the fairs are publicly owned and accountable to taxpayers. Frank Stronach could, of course, subsidize Northern California racing because owning racetracks is his hobby. But I assume people would start getting voted out of office if money intended to support agriculture in California- which is what the fairs are supposed to be about- gets incinerated on horse racing instead.)
|
|
|
07-22-2023, 04:11 PM
|
#133
|
Unreconstructed
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Appalachia
Posts: 6,646
|
California racing was at its best when there was one circuit. This pretty much ended when Oak Tree was established. In those days NoCal got some top class horses and the Golden Gate Mile was a big race. But that wasn't enough action, so it became two year round circuits. Increased Fair dates sounds like an endless summer, but it was a dismal failure when Del Mar tried it. It doesn't matter, racing as we knew it is gone. The class disparity between our horses and the Euros is widening as well.
__________________
Deo Vindice
|
|
|
07-22-2023, 04:14 PM
|
#134
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 371
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp
I am not going to make predictions on who ships and who doesn't, but in general it's mistaken to say they can't compete down here. What would happen if they all did ship is that SoCal tracks would start carding races attractive to the shippers. So you'd see Maiden 16 races and $4k claimers and stuff. Indeed, you'd probably see races mostly filled with NorCal horses along with some people moving up from Los Al short track thoroughbred races.
If they came, some of those horses would win some races down here.
(On another note, I am highly skeptical of the expansion of the fairs to create a full NorCal circuit for another reason-- these fair meets will lose a lot of money, and the fairs are publicly owned and accountable to taxpayers. Frank Stronach could, of course, subsidize Northern California racing because owning racetracks is his hobby. But I assume people would start getting voted out of office if money intended to support agriculture in California- which is what the fairs are supposed to be about- gets incinerated on horse racing instead.)
|
Frank doesn't run the company anymore. I doubt he is the one closing down the track. I see this more as the company getting max value from selling the land under which Golden Gate Fields sits at. And most likely not putting it back into the business.
Also I have a hard time believing the company is going to put up so much money to entice these guys to ship their cheap horses down south. It doesn't make financial sense. What is more likely is they are getting out of the smaller tracks and recouping what they can get out of it.
|
|
|
07-22-2023, 06:08 PM
|
#135
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 371
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaryG
California racing was at its best when there was one circuit. This pretty much ended when Oak Tree was established. In those days NoCal got some top class horses and the Golden Gate Mile was a big race. But that wasn't enough action, so it became two year round circuits. Increased Fair dates sounds like an endless summer, but it was a dismal failure when Del Mar tried it. It doesn't matter, racing as we knew it is gone. The class disparity between our horses and the Euros is widening as well.
|
The highlight of the California meet these days is the Del Mar summer meeting. Hard to replicate that considering a lot of that is due to the location and weather.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|