Brisnet American Pridyce Records

[MightBeSosa]

Interesting you clowns are talking about everything but the bad call on turf breeding.

Champion T mare, close up , this is no turf?

One thing is for sure, on the internet , its 1/9 you'll be talking to nitwits.

PS Those that agree with me are AFRAID to post, as the op here is in love with the small man.

[Saratoga_Mike]

Originally Posted by MightBeSosa

Interesting you clowns are talking about everything but the bad call on turf breeding.

Champion T mare, close up , this is no turf?

One thing is for sure, on the internet , its 1/9 you'll be talking to nitwits.

PS Those that agree with me are AFRAID to post, as the op here is in love with the small man.

You're arrogantly ignorant. I have had heated exchanges with Serling. In t'bred racing, the maternal lineage determines the 2nd dam.

Continue to celebrate your own ignorance; it's spectacularly self-referential.

[MightBeSosa]

Originally Posted by Saratoga_Mike

You're arrogantly ignorant. I have had heated exchanges with Serling. In t'bred racing, the maternal lineage determines the 2nd dam.

Continue to celebrate your own ignorance; it's spectacularly self-referential.

Guess thats why that winner paid 6-1, even after the smart money crushed it from 11-1 1 mtp.

Morons like you!

So you're saying that that sires line is completely ignored for handicapping purposes? If you're not saying that, then you're deliberately ignoring the fact that serling is fos, and blew the call on T breeding. Either way....


What is it about serling that brings out all these guys with crushes?


Anyones thats followed serling or listened to him on byks show, knows he's a nut job.

[MightBeSosa]

try this, it may help those of you that are confused by the deliberate obfuscation of the fact that a brilliant T pedigree on the sires side is not the = of 'no turf breeding', despite what supposed, ''''experts'''' say.

A Psychologist's Take on Willful Ignorance

According to a Psychology Today article, there are 3 types of ignorance, only one of which has a negative connotation (http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/...-ask-dont-tell).

The 3 types of ignorance are, according to Susan L. Smalley, the author of the article, "ordinary ignorance, willful ignorance, and higher ignorance." Ordinary ignorance means that somebody doesn't know something. There is nothing wrong with that, and in fact, being "ignorant" of something commonly serves as a motivation to discover more knowledge. "Higher ignorance," seems to be a kind of extension of ordinary ignorance. Higher ignorance" is lofty in scope and hard to achieve—it is a reverence for the unknown—for mystery—or what may be unknowable." It recognizes, for instance, that no matter how much one knows about something, there are still more intricate details that one does not know. It asks the question also, what is knowable, and what, if anything is unknowable?

In contrast to ordinary of higher ignorance, willful ignorance occurs when a person knows the truth but chooses to ignore it, or the person refuses to abandon false beliefs and pursue the development of further knowledge. According to the Urban Dictionary. willful ignorance is: The practice or act of intentional and blatant avoidance, disregard or disagreement with facts, empirical evidence and well-founded arguements because they oppose or contradict your own existing personal beliefs (http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...ul%20ignorance).

[Tom]

Anyones thats followed serling or listened to him on byks show, knows he's a nut job.

No, they know he is a very good handicapper.
We do, however,m know YOU are a nut job.
Big moth, small brain.
Dime a dozen.
Red boarding......that is all you are doing here.
Aside from making total fool of yourself.
Probably not the first time.

[OTM Al]

You know that other thread that touches on how big a jackass you have to be to get banned from a track? Sadly you have to be a bigger jackass than this guy. Just a frame of reference thing....

[MightBeSosa]

Originally Posted by Tom

No, they know he is a very good handicapper.
We do, however,m know YOU are a nut job.
Big moth, small brain.
Dime a dozen.
Red boarding......that is all you are doing here.
Aside from making total fool of yourself.
Probably not the first time.

Tom, your crush on serling is your business. And what do moths have to do with this?

I note for those that are afraid to post anything against the great ''''''expert'''''' , that no one has had the balls to say, you know, there was some monster Turf breeding there, the guys right.

Its a well know mental illness, called NOT INVENTED HERE. Nothing that doesn't come from the lips of the great one can every be acknowledged as insight. This is why he now works for a living, this is why he gets upset whenever byk mentions a horse he didn't. It is sad.

This is precisely why 99% of them are failed horseplayers.

[MightBeSosa]

Originally Posted by OTM Al

You know that other thread that touches on how big a jackass you have to be to get banned from a track? Sadly you have to be a bigger jackass than this guy. Just a frame of reference thing....

8,000 posts and thats the best you can do? Let me guess, 350 lbs, smokes cigars. Am I close?

[MightBeSosa]

Tom 58,000 posts? total mental case. I dont care if thats over 20 years, thats someone without a life.

[Tom]

Typical replies from a jerk - try to change the subject.
That all you got, dude? This ain't third grade. For most of us, anyways.....I guess you are still there.

You challenge a proven winning player with nothing to back up your big mouth and you call me mental case?

[OTM Al]

Originally Posted by MightBeSosa

8,000 posts and thats the best you can do? Let me guess, 350 lbs, smokes cigars. Am I close?

I don't care for cigars.

[MightBeSosa]

Originally Posted by Tom

You challenge a proven winning player with nothing to back up your big mouth and you call me mental case?

You challenge: I didn't challenge anyone.

proven winning player: really, where's the proof. the winners I know about are not paid employees of nyra or any other outlet.


nothing to back up: I posted the proof there was considerable TURF potential, barely hidden from view, but apparently so buried the blind handicappers here STILL can't see it.

So, as usual , you're 0 for 3

[MightBeSosa]

Originally Posted by OTM Al

I don't care for cigars.

So I got the top half and blew the exacta?

[OTM Al]

Originally Posted by MightBeSosa

So I got the top half and blew the exacta?

As usual, you are 0 for 3.

[PaceAdvantage]

Gone for a few days and I miss this? Boy do I feel gypped...

What's worse? Having a man crush? Or being a complete lunatic?

I vote lunatic...