 |
06-17-2017, 03:43 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 562
|
Gulfstream Mandatory Payout Post Time Milking
They have pushed the post time back 4 times now... we are 20 minutes behind post time and jockeys are just getting a leg up.... Unreal
|
|
|
|
06-17-2017, 04:09 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 876
|
20 minutes is business as usual. Im surprised I wasn't longer. Schedule post was 3:25. I was expecting them to still be loading at 4pm
|
|
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 07:28 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,515
|
But then Santa Anita, another Stronach track, consistently goes off right on time. I don't get it.
|
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 12:16 PM
|
#4
|
|
clean money
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maryland
Posts: 23,556
|
they went off @ 3:51
26 minutes and I had 'over 25'
about the only bet I won yesterday
__________________
Preparation. Discipline. Patience. Decisiveness.
|
|
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 04:14 PM
|
#5
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,450
|
Another shining example of the industry respecting the player... 
Of course, I'm sure they look at this exactly opposite...they are giving the player every chance to get in on this stellar betting opportunity... 
|
|
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 11:38 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,163
|
They should have a rule like the airlines. If post times are pushed back because of circumstances beyond their control (weather, gate malfunction), well tough luck. But if there is no excuse for delaying post time, including just trying to meet a pool minimum, after 5 minutes, if they haven't started loading, you start fining the track one percentage point of their take up to the maximum take for every minute of unexcused delay. Then see how well they keep post times.
|
|
|
|
|
06-18-2017, 11:58 PM
|
#7
|
|
vaguely on topic...
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 104
|
i thought it was sorta comical/harmless myself, lol
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2017, 02:10 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Flint Hills
Posts: 474
|
I think part of the reason for delays are due to TV trying to maximize number of tracks with races shown as well as not forfeiting advertising $. Both tracks and simulcast outlets benefit by having as many races shown "live" as possible.
__________________
"Better to do little well than more poorly." Appy
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2017, 03:18 PM
|
#9
|
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,825
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Appy
I think part of the reason for delays are due to TV trying to maximize number of tracks with races shown as well as not forfeiting advertising $. Both tracks and simulcast outlets benefit by having as many races shown "live" as possible.
|
This has nothing to do with Gulfstream doing it.
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2017, 04:08 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,821
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HalvOnHorseracing
They should have a rule like the airlines. If post times are pushed back because of circumstances beyond their control (weather, gate malfunction), well tough luck. But if there is no excuse for delaying post time, including just trying to meet a pool minimum, after 5 minutes, if they haven't started loading, you start fining the track one percentage point of their take up to the maximum take for every minute of unexcused delay. Then see how well they keep post times.
|
So trainers drugging their horses always gets a pass from you (and before you say it doesn't, I define "a pass" as "hundreds of posts defending any trainer busted for a positive drug test"), but tracks pushing back their post times to try to get more people to bet is a horrible offense that deserves heavy fines? 
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Rate This Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
