 |
|
11-22-2022, 06:22 PM
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xtb
I think Kari Lake has gotten 46 all spun up, and not in a good way.
|
KLS[yndrome] already? Not a good sign. 
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
11-22-2022, 06:22 PM
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,073
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
Also from above video...this is UNREAL:
|
Let's see.. You're upset because the young girl has dressed her Teddy Bear in what you perceive to be a bondage outfit. WHY? Do you belong to some Teddy Bear liberation organization. Do really think Teddy cares how he is dressed?
Is it actually a bondage outfit or is that just Tucker's warped imagination.
Contrary to Tucker's opinion Ashcroft v Free Speech coalition did not overturn any child pornography laws. There are plenty of Child Pornography laws remaining. and The Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 remains on the books minus a few paragraphs. SCOTUS found those paragraphs to be overly broad and generalized. In other words, they could apply to adult pornography and even such things as Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet.
Paraphrasing here, CPPA prohibited anything that gave the impression of or could be construed as involving minors in sexual acts.
Child pornography laws were not written to protect adults from seeing depictions of children engaged in illicit activities. (Although I certainly do not want to observe such a thing.) They were written to protect the children, both by puniishing the producer and the consumer of such material.
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2022, 07:48 PM
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,463
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by xtb
I think Kari Lake has gotten 46 all spun up, and not in a good way.
|
It is not Kari Lake, he moved to Arizona to eventually sit with the scorpions and found out they all ran away and did not want him.
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2022, 08:10 PM
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 15,118
|
How did that "Don't say gay" thing go for you? How do you think the "Teddy" is dressed? Is it innocent? Or is the "paper work" just a prop?
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2022, 08:15 PM
|
#20
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,447
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost
Let's see.. You're upset because the young girl has dressed her Teddy Bear in what you perceive to be a bondage outfit. WHY? Do you belong to some Teddy Bear liberation organization. Do really think Teddy cares how he is dressed?
Is it actually a bondage outfit or is that just Tucker's warped imagination.
Contrary to Tucker's opinion Ashcroft v Free Speech coalition did not overturn any child pornography laws. There are plenty of Child Pornography laws remaining. and The Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 remains on the books minus a few paragraphs. SCOTUS found those paragraphs to be overly broad and generalized. In other words, they could apply to adult pornography and even such things as Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet.
Paraphrasing here, CPPA prohibited anything that gave the impression of or could be construed as involving minors in sexual acts.
Child pornography laws were not written to protect adults from seeing depictions of children engaged in illicit activities. (Although I certainly do not want to observe such a thing.) They were written to protect the children, both by puniishing the producer and the consumer of such material.
|
You're an awful human being.
The imagery they used and the paperwork they CHOSE to display on the table is quite honestly horrifying.
I guess jocko was right about you all along. I didn't actually believe him.
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2022, 08:36 PM
|
#21
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 6,246
|
Quote:
|
Child pornography laws were not written to protect adults from seeing depictions of children engaged in illicit activities.
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but possession of child pornography is a felony even if one is a legal adult. Child pornography laws also exist to punish those who partake of the vice.
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2022, 09:18 PM
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,900
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhantomOnTour
|
So very ignorant of you.
To be clear, check your own *signature*... 
~
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2022, 09:22 PM
|
#23
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Ketchikan,AK
Posts: 2,086
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost
Let's see.. You're upset because the young girl has dressed her Teddy Bear in what you perceive to be a bondage outfit. WHY? Do you belong to some Teddy Bear liberation organization. Do really think Teddy cares how he is dressed?
Is it actually a bondage outfit or is that just Tucker's warped imagination.
Contrary to Tucker's opinion Ashcroft v Free Speech coalition did not overturn any child pornography laws. There are plenty of Child Pornography laws remaining. and The Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 remains on the books minus a few paragraphs. SCOTUS found those paragraphs to be overly broad and generalized. In other words, they could apply to adult pornography and even such things as Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet.
Paraphrasing here, CPPA prohibited anything that gave the impression of or could be construed as involving minors in sexual acts.
Child pornography laws were not written to protect adults from seeing depictions of children engaged in illicit activities. (Although I certainly do not want to observe such a thing.) They were written to protect the children, both by puniishing the producer and the consumer of such material.
|
Very disturbing, that you know so much about child porn laws. This is not your first post on the subject.
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2022, 10:14 PM
|
#24
|
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,759
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage
You're an awful human being.
The imagery they used and the paperwork they CHOSE to display on the table is quite honestly horrifying.
I guess jocko was right about you all along. I didn't actually believe him.
|
He will rationalize anything to agree with the left.
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2022, 10:40 PM
|
#25
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,073
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by delayjf
Correct me if I'm wrong, but possession of child pornography is a felony even if one is a legal adult. Child pornography laws also exist to punish those who partake of the vice.
|
I think that is what I said.
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2022, 10:40 PM
|
#26
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Beaverdam Virginia
Posts: 12,595
|
Not shocking that they are trying to introduce children to perverse behavior at younger and younger ages.
|
|
|
|
11-22-2022, 10:42 PM
|
#27
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,073
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisl
Very disturbing, that you know so much about child porn laws. This is not your first post on the subject.
|
What I know about the subject is what I learned responding to the ignorance here.
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2022, 10:50 PM
|
#28
|
|
Resurrectionist
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Cheyenne, Wy
Posts: 3,615
|
Jimmy.........or should I say Professor Jimmy?
__________________
Battle is the most magnificent competition in which a human being can indulge. It brings out all that is best; it removes all that is base. All men are afraid in battle. The coward is the one who lets his fear overcome his sense of duty. Duty is the essence of manhood.
|
|
|
|
|
11-22-2022, 10:55 PM
|
#29
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 15,118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jocko699
Jimmy.........or should I say Professor Jimmy?
|
Jimmy Epstein.......
|
|
|
|
|
11-23-2022, 03:03 AM
|
#30
|
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,447
|
Here we go...former asst. director of FBI calls for "civil consequences" against anyone who doesn't like the sexualization of children...wow...
Quote:
They will call you an accessory to murder. They'll threaten to sue you into poverty as the assistant director of the FBI just did, if you don't shut up. It's pretty weird when you think about it. In fact, it's very weird, but they have nothing else to say because actually children really are being sexually exploited in this country, in some cases for money. It's not hidden. It's in the open and it's totally real. This summer, for example, Matt Walsh exposed the atrocities underway at Vanderbilt Medical Center in Nashville. A physician there admitted to mutilating the genitals of children because it's a profit center for the hospital. Watch this.
Dr. Shayne Taylor: These surgeries make a lot of money. So, female to male chest reconstruction could bring in $40,000. A patient just on routine hormone treatment I'm only seeing a few times a year can bring in several thousand dollars without requiring lots of visits and labs. It actually makes money for the hospital.
"It actually makes money for the hospital." Now, if you were a muckraking reporter with a conscience, that would be the story of a lifetime. It's all there on tape. A doctor admitting they're mutilating the genitals of children for money, naming the dollar amounts. How could you pass that up? But everyone passed it up. No one covered it. Instead, journalists attacked Matt Walsh for uncovering it. Really? What's the motive there?
Nor do they cover what's going on in hospitals across the country, including CHOP, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, the famous hospital, a hospital that admitted in an email to performing bottom surgery on a minor and slicing off the breast of young women for no medical reason whatsoever. There's no medical justification for that ever and yet they bragged about doing it. In Boston, a staffer at the Children's Hospital bragged on tape about two-year-olds preparing to transition. Truly insane. Utterly divorced from legitimate medicine, but again, it was completely ignored. Here it is.
DR. KERRY MCGREGOR, BOSTON CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL: So, most of the patients that we have in the Gems Clinic actually know their gender, usually around the age of puberty, but a good portion of children do know as early as seemingly from the womb and they will usually express their gender identity as very young children, some as soon as they can talk. They may say phrases such as "I'm a girl" or "I'm a boy" or "I'm going to be a woman" or "I'm going to be a mom." Kids know very, very early. So, in the Gems Clinic, we see a variety of young children all the way down to ages two and three and usually up to the ages of nine.
|
Last edited by PaceAdvantage; 11-23-2022 at 03:07 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Rate This Thread |
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
@
