|
|
07-26-2018, 01:59 PM
|
#91
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 686
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff P
Horse racing (with 22% blended takeout) is like the Titanic and horseplayers are the passengers.
.
|
The raft analogy is great. Even the though some sharp players realize the issue, they still concern themselves to rearranging the deck chairs while it's going down instead of finding the raft.
|
|
|
07-26-2018, 08:55 PM
|
#92
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1,831
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCOURTNEY
The raft analogy is great. Even the though some sharp players realize the issue, they still concern themselves to rearranging the deck chairs while it's going down instead of finding the raft.
|
I don't think folks realize how big a nut that is (20%). Without a constant source of new money, the betting dollar evaporates at a very unhealthy rate.
Not sure who is willing to LOSE all that money, but it aint the whales and it aint me. Probably not many of the posters here either.
Lifeblood of the game is in fact, new players. Willing to lose.
We had that for a long time before local casinos and lotteries everywhere.
|
|
|
07-26-2018, 09:03 PM
|
#93
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,745
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AltonKelsey
I don't think folks realize how big a nut that is (20%). Without a constant source of new money, the betting dollar evaporates at a very unhealthy rate.
Not sure who is willing to LOSE all that money, but it aint the whales and it aint me. Probably not many of the posters here either.
Lifeblood of the game is in fact, new players. Willing to lose.
We had that for a long time before local casinos and lotteries everywhere.
|
Australia had the same issue - than sports gambling became popular and legal. Try to justify a 20 percent nut when others are paying 10 percent on more popular sports. They went to exchange and fixed wagering and turned it around. As I stated before PM wagering is a dead product. Racing needs to completely change the pricing model.
|
|
|
07-26-2018, 10:44 PM
|
#94
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 4
|
Totally agree. It would be an unfair advantage, but the equivalent is SOP in the stock mkt - it's called "HFT." Read "Flash Boys" by Michael Lewis. The big players bid among themselves for the fastest "real time" access to the flow of transactions, often buying license to co-locate within the exchange bldg in order to beat their competition to a guaranteed arbitrage opportunity by a few nanoseconds. The exchanges are anxious to cooperate with their whales and apparently dont mind screwing the public in the process. As in any other endeavor, $money talks; if it happens on Wall Street, it could happen at the OTB hubs as well...
|
|
|
07-26-2018, 11:40 PM
|
#95
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 16,943
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by racenarios
Totally agree. It would be an unfair advantage, but the equivalent is SOP in the stock mkt - it's called "HFT." Read "Flash Boys" by Michael Lewis. The big players bid among themselves for the fastest "real time" access to the flow of transactions, often buying license to co-locate within the exchange bldg in order to beat their competition to a guaranteed arbitrage opportunity by a few nanoseconds. The exchanges are anxious to cooperate with their whales and apparently dont mind screwing the public in the process. As in any other endeavor, $money talks; if it happens on Wall Street, it could happen at the OTB hubs as well...
|
Technically, that kind of arrangement is available in horse racing but all it does is get you the same information that the public gets a few seconds earlier.
To be clear, it doesn't get you more frequent updates. It just gets you the updates a little fast. And it is crazy expensive. Of course, if you are betting THAT kind of money, the ADW will work the cost into your "arrangement."
It does allow you to WAGER faster, but before people get all bent out of shape over that, one must honestly ask themselves, "Is having to bet when the 1st horse enters the gate vs. when the next-to-last horse enters what is causing you to lose?"
I think not.
Dave
|
|
|
07-26-2018, 11:47 PM
|
#96
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,602
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz
Technically, that kind of arrangement is available in horse racing but all it does is get you the same information that the public gets a few seconds earlier.
To be clear, it doesn't get you more frequent updates. It just gets you the updates a little fast. And it is crazy expensive. Of course, if you are betting THAT kind of money, the ADW will work the cost into your "arrangement."
It does allow you to WAGER faster, but before people get all bent out of shape over that, one must honestly ask themselves, "Is having to bet when the 1st horse enters the gate vs. when the next-to-last horse enters what is causing you to lose?"
I think not.
Dave
|
What does the ability to wager when the last horse enters the gate, instead of when the 1st horse enters the gate, mean to the Whales, profit-wise?
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
|
|
|
07-27-2018, 12:09 AM
|
#97
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 845
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
What does the ability to wager when the last horse enters the gate, instead of when the 1st horse enters the gate, mean to the Whales, profit-wise?
|
This is a good question. Phrased another slightly different way - how would you/I use access to quicker tote updates successfully? So far, the only thing I can think of is that it might let me avoid cases where I bet and then someone immediately bets after me, lowering my selection below what would be breakeven. Seeing that bet a little bit earlier may let get out of that case. Not sure how often that might happen or if it's even a realistic scenario. Even if it were, those cases would strike as whale vs whale scenarios.
As Dave said, how would YOU profit from tote data that you get let's say 30 seconds faster than I get?
|
|
|
07-27-2018, 12:31 AM
|
#98
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,602
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JerryBoyle
This is a good question. Phrased another slightly different way - how would you/I use access to quicker tote updates successfully? So far, the only thing I can think of is that it might let me avoid cases where I bet and then someone immediately bets after me, lowering my selection below what would be breakeven. Seeing that bet a little bit earlier may let get out of that case. Not sure how often that might happen or if it's even a realistic scenario. Even if it were, those cases would strike as whale vs whale scenarios.
As Dave said, how would YOU profit from tote data that you get let's say 30 seconds faster than I get?
|
These ultra-quick updates would only help the bettor if he already has the technical ability to attach them to the powerful betting software which would allow him to place his bets at a lightening speed, as well. The cost of such a luxury would probably eliminate you and me.
That's why I asked Dave my prior question. How big of an advantage do these quick updates give to these Whales...when they still have each other to outmaneuver?
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
|
|
|
07-27-2018, 12:40 AM
|
#99
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
These ultra-quick updates would only help the bettor if he already has the technical ability to attach them to the powerful betting software which would allow him to place his bets at a lightening speed, as well. The cost of such a luxury would probably eliminate you and me.
That's why I asked Dave my prior question. How big of an advantage do these quick updates give to these Whales...when they still have each other to outmaneuver?
|
Question Thask, who do you think has the bigger advantage, the ultra-quick betting software, or the Big Guy at the track who's standing by his "teller", canceling his bets when his horse doesn't break well 10 seconds after they've left the gate?
|
|
|
07-27-2018, 12:41 AM
|
#100
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,602
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReplayRandall
Question Thask, who do you think has the bigger advantage, the ultra-quick betting software, or the Big Guy at the track who's standing by his "teller", canceling his bets when his horse doesn't break well 15 seconds after they've left the gate?
|
How do you know that it ain't the same guy(s) in both cases?
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
|
|
|
07-27-2018, 12:42 AM
|
#101
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 16,943
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
What does the ability to wager when the last horse enters the gate, instead of when the 1st horse enters the gate, mean to the Whales, profit-wise?
|
Nothing, really.
That was my point.
I suppose that they could have a little more time computing trifecta and superfecta combinations, but with money being no object, the computing horse power is purchasable.
There is also a matter of reliability.
For example, most people get tote information from an ADW, then it is passed to the player. This allows the whale to get the data directly from the source - i.e. the same level as the ADW.
There really isn't much advantage. Certainly nothing that is causing anyone to lose that would otherwise win.
|
|
|
07-27-2018, 12:44 AM
|
#102
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
How do you know that it ain't the same guy(s) in both cases?
|
Nope....try again.
|
|
|
07-27-2018, 12:46 AM
|
#103
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,602
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz
Nothing, really.
That was my point.
I suppose that they could have a little more time computing trifecta and superfecta combinations, but with money being no object, the computing horse power is purchasable.
There is also a matter of reliability.
For example, most people get tote information from an ADW, then it is passed to the player. This allows the whale to get the data directly from the source - i.e. the same level as the ADW.
There really isn't much advantage. Certainly nothing that is causing anyone to lose that would otherwise win.
|
That's where I get confused. If there isn't any real advantage...then why do these syndicates play the "crazy cost" that you said these quick updates carry?
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
|
|
|
07-27-2018, 12:50 AM
|
#104
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,602
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReplayRandall
Nope....try again.
|
You'll need to do better than that, Randall...if you really want me to debate you further. You'll have to tell me how you can be sure that the "Big Guy", who is standing next to the teller so he could cancel his bets after the race starts, isn't associated with the OTHER guys...who are making the computer bets.
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
|
|
|
07-27-2018, 01:01 AM
|
#105
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 660
|
Good question Thaskalos re why do the biggest whale syndicates pay the crazy cost for the best and fastest tote updates
The answer is obvious. It is a big advantage to have last crack at the tote board
Bets made by other players contain information. The biggest whale syndicate gets to see everyone else's bets before they place their bet. They then have the chance to factor in this information before they make their own bets. It gives them a chance to catch those late bets made by stable insiders and then bet in response
So the stable insider places a large bet with seconds to go. The big whale syndicate has a chance to see this and follow the money if they think that is the right play to make. The average player only sees this betting action halfway through the race = late odd changes that everyone has been complaining about recently
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|