Hillary Clinton

[Tom]

Originally Posted by Spiderman

As if you really care about equality for anyone but your elitist doctrine.

Of course he does - he is NOT a democrat.

[Saratoga_Mike]

Originally Posted by Spiderman

I've got $100 to wager that this is a bogus story.

You realize "Guccifer," the hacker, was extradited from Romania to the US - he appeared in federal court in Alexandria recently? This isn't some right-wing fantasy. He was serving time in Romania on similar charges (computer hacking). He's hacked the accounts of Romanian intelligence officials, a couple former US presidents, and Colin Powell, among others. If you don't believe me, pull up a NY Times article on him - should be a legit source for you.

So what's so implausible about the Russians buying/receiving info from him?

[Saratoga_Mike]

Originally Posted by Tom

Bob Woodward.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/wo...rticle/2591021

[Greyfox]

Originally Posted by Spiderman

As if you really care about equality for anyone but your elitist doctrine.

Check in at Idiots Anonymous.
Your "Stupidity Prevention Pills" aren't working.

[Tom]

Thanks, Mike!

[Tom]

Originally Posted by Spiderman

As if you really care about equality for anyone but your elitist doctrine.

Maybe you could enlighten us with your great knowledge on this subject.....how do you justify her ALWAYS blaming the women that Bill has lied about? And the fact that SA supports here, she is happy to accept it, yet they put women into SLAVERY over there?

Perhaps you think mistreatment of women is a joke?

OR perhaps you just think what you are told to think?
I suspect THAT is correct answer.

[Spiderman]

Originally Posted by Tom

Maybe you could enlighten us with your great knowledge on this subject.....how do you justify her ALWAYS blaming the women that Bill has lied about? And the fact that SA supports here, she is happy to accept it, yet they put women into SLAVERY over there?

Perhaps you think mistreatment of women is a joke?

OR perhaps you just think what you are told to think?
I suspect THAT is correct answer.

She is NOT responsible for the acts of her husband.

[Tom]

She blamed OTHER people for it.....of course she is part of the lie.
She blamed it on a video, er, no, wait, a vast right wing conspiracy.
Hillary ALWAYS has some stawman to blame everything on.
She always took the side of her perverted hubby over that of the women.
She is an enabler of his actions.

[Clocker]

Originally Posted by Spiderman

She is NOT responsible for the acts of her husband.

That's right. A vast right wing conspiracy was responsible.

No one said she was responsible. The charge is that she lied about it and helped cover it up by attacking the women who come forth.

And then she has the hypocrisy to say:

"Today I want to send a message to every survivor of sexual assault," Clinton said. "Don't let anyone silence your voice. You have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed and we're with you."

[Tom]

"Stand up and let your voice be heard."

So I can track you down and destroy you!

If Hillary had any respect for women, she would have a sex-change.

[PaceAdvantage]

So is it also true the Clinton Foundation pays it's male executives 38% more than its female executives?

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by Spiderman

I've got $100 to wager that this is a bogus story.

1. At the time Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, there was no State Department policy against using personal email.
http://www.politicususa.com/2015/08/...ate-email.html

n CNN’s New Day, State Department spokesman John Kirby said, “We have said in the past, Chris that there was no policy prohibiting the use of a private email account here at the State Department, and that is still a fact. Now, obviously, we have policies in place now that highly discourage that, and you are supposed to use your government account so that there is a constant, permanent record of it, but at the time she was not violating policy….I can tell you that there was no prohibition for her use of this, and we’ve since changed the policy to discourage that greatly, and in fact, the policy is that you have to use your government account for business.”

2. Material in the emails was classified retroactively. I believe there is a clause in our constitution against ex post facto laws.

3 Guccifer claims to have hacked the account, but independent investigators have been unable to confirm that fact.

4. It is amazing how those on the right are so willing to believe an agency of the Russian government. It almost makes one believe they are fellow travelers.

5. You win the $100. Good luck collecting.

[Greyfox]

Originally Posted by mostpost

4. It is amazing how those on the right are so willing to believe an agency of the Russian government. It almost makes one believe they are fellow travelers.

Right. And we shouldn't have believed Sputnik or Yuri Gagarin existed either.

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by Tom

Washington Post by the numbers...

# reporters 100% assigned to digging up dirt on Trump -20
# reporters 100% assigned to digging up dirt on Hillary - 0

On the FBI investigation into her emails - "We do not thing she purposely passed along classified material."



And you guys call it FAUX News!

Talk about a misrepresentation of the facts. BY YOU.
Woodward did not say the reporters were assigned to dig up dirt on Trump. They were assigned to learn everything they could about him. I think that is important if someone is running for President.

Woodward also said that the Post was doing the same thing with Hillary Clinton and the other Presidential candidates. Woodward did not mention the number of reporters assigned to Clinton or the other candidates. That does not mean it was zero.

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

So is it also true the Clinton Foundation pays it's male executives 38% more than its female executives?

That would only matter if it paid the men 38% more for doing the same job as the women.